\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Newsome and Bass: 100% responsible for CA fires. TX shitcons? Not responsible.

No responsibility for the flooding. Do i have this right?
laughsome nursing home
  07/06/25
...
Adventurous carnelian messiness dysfunction
  07/06/25
...
big mauve lettuce
  07/06/25
...
laughsome nursing home
  07/06/25
Don’t forget about Trujillo
big mauve lettuce
  07/07/25
Lance Bass?
Supple Stead Headpube
  07/07/25
He can't keep getting away with this
slate lascivious menage nibblets
  07/08/25
...
mentally impaired stirring therapy
  07/08/25
...
Comical sadistic theater
  07/07/25
https://x.com/ronxyz00/status/1942249751942177190?s=46
big mauve lettuce
  07/08/25
no one controls the rain. otoh, public policies have an e...
geriatric motley becky digit ratio
  07/08/25
no one controls wildfires. otoh, public policies have an ...
Appetizing cordovan resort
  07/08/25
To anyone who reads this thread in the future: this poast is...
Insecure sound barrier rigor
  07/08/25
it would reduce the severity of floods as measured in deaths...
Appetizing cordovan resort
  07/08/25
Another example of terrible logic. There is no indication a ...
Insecure sound barrier rigor
  07/08/25
when you shift the discussion to warning systems i can agree...
geriatric motley becky digit ratio
  07/08/25
I remember epah's smug response about thinning/clearing out ...
Chocolate field
  07/08/25
that's fine but republican politicians in this area rejected...
Appetizing cordovan resort
  07/08/25
While it’s clearly not entirely Newsome’s or Bas...
Insecure sound barrier rigor
  07/08/25
leaving the LA reservoirs bone dry was a pretty big fuckup i...
Chocolate field
  07/08/25
The difference is that the GOP is the party of personal resp...
disrespectful sooty chapel
  07/08/25
The pretense that anyone believes anything they argue is lon...
Light Wild State
  07/08/25
titcr Logic, consistency, and objective truth are long de...
fluffy thriller skinny woman
  07/08/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 6th, 2025 6:21 PM
Author: laughsome nursing home

No responsibility for the flooding. Do i have this right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49077042)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 6th, 2025 6:24 PM
Author: Adventurous carnelian messiness dysfunction



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49077054)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 6th, 2025 6:26 PM
Author: big mauve lettuce



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49077056)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 6th, 2025 10:07 PM
Author: laughsome nursing home



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49077627)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 7th, 2025 7:46 AM
Author: big mauve lettuce

Don’t forget about Trujillo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49078287)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 7th, 2025 7:46 AM
Author: Supple Stead Headpube

Lance Bass?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49078288)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 9:49 AM
Author: slate lascivious menage nibblets

He can't keep getting away with this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082048)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:21 AM
Author: mentally impaired stirring therapy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082133)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 7th, 2025 8:30 AM
Author: Comical sadistic theater



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49078345)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 9:49 AM
Author: big mauve lettuce

https://x.com/ronxyz00/status/1942249751942177190?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082046)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:09 AM
Author: geriatric motley becky digit ratio

no one controls the rain.

otoh, public policies have an enormous impact on the frequency and severity of fires in California. at long last even portions of the political left have recognized how awful California's fire policies have been for decades.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082095)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:29 AM
Author: Appetizing cordovan resort

no one controls wildfires.

otoh, public policies have an enormous impact on the frequency and severity of flash floods in Texas. at long last even portions of the political right have recognized how awful Texas's flash flood policies have been for decades

https://archive.is/zhj5M

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082152)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:59 AM
Author: Insecure sound barrier rigor

To anyone who reads this thread in the future: this poast is a great example of fallacious logic. A siren system would reduce neither the frequency nor severity of floods.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082260)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: Appetizing cordovan resort

it would reduce the severity of floods as measured in deaths. no one cares about the frequency or intensity of floods that don't impact people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082264)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:41 AM
Author: Insecure sound barrier rigor

Another example of terrible logic. There is no indication a “siren system” would systemically reduce flooding deaths, nor have had any impact on the most recent flood. This is just a wishful “what if” that assumes perfect implementation and adherence.

Reminder to everyone: warning were sent prior to this flood, directly to people’s phones. They are complaining that the warnings were too late and not intrusive enough to be noticed. These are the true hurdles a warning system has to overcome.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082377)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:05 AM
Author: geriatric motley becky digit ratio

when you shift the discussion to warning systems i can agree with a lot of what you say.

but getting back to the original problem, it is absolutely true that public policies have an enormous impact on the frequency and severity of wildfires and public policies have no similar impact on rainfall. California spent a century suppressing fires in ecosystems that depend on fires. there is a massive backlog of fuel for fires. and although everyone recognizes the need to do far better management there are still almost no controlled burns and thinning is constantly opposed. so, yes, the Dems in CA bear massive blame for fires.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082271)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:17 AM
Author: Chocolate field

I remember epah's smug response about thinning/clearing out brush that it would just grow back in a year anyways as if that's a hurdle in a city with tremendously valuable real estate and that is also overrun with mexican day laborers who could easily do the job. tbf I never did a 6 month stint as a rural firefighter as part of my mormon mission in 1987 so what the fuck do I know?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082292)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:38 AM
Author: Appetizing cordovan resort

that's fine but republican politicians in this area rejected federal money for sirens because it was coming from democrats and because they thought sirens were annoying. the county commissioner, literally a NASA PhD engineer, thought the traditional system of neighbors calling neighbors was sufficient. numerous citizens testified that the communist COVID joe biden mafia would infiltrate the community if they took money for the sirens. so they rejected it and bought police radios instead. the governor wasn't involved in it, the state republican party wasn't involved in it, but it was a republican policy decision made by people greatly influenced by a kind of republican mindset.

look i'm on team individual responsibility here. every adult on that river should have been paying attention and should have been prepared. i'm sure a lot of them saw the warnings and ignored them. the government can't save everyone from an inherently dangerous situation unless they totally prohibit human activity in the area, and i'm not for that. but the local government had a free siren system laid at their feet and they rejected it because blue team bad. in hindsight that looks really fucking stupid and it deserves criticism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082368)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:18 AM
Author: Insecure sound barrier rigor

While it’s clearly not entirely Newsome’s or Bass’ fault, they are more at fault for the fires than anyone is for the Texas floods.

The Texas floods were a less-than-once-a-century event, and occurred in an area without significant development. The Palisades fires happen a couple times a decade, and they keep building more houses there. The state’s home insurance program incentivizes people to keep rebuilding. Plus the fire problems are exacerbated by the fire management policies that Newsome definitely does have say over.

The fires in California are far more comparable to Houston flooding, since it’s one of the most regularly flooded cities in America and they keep building the exact same houses back.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082127)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:11 AM
Author: Chocolate field

leaving the LA reservoirs bone dry was a pretty big fuckup in the wildfire case. it's also very doubtful that the 5 or 6 most expendable ppl in the NWS that were shitcanned would have made much of a difference. likewise even if NWS warning system improvements and local flood prevention improvements were a top 5 priority for Trump from day 1, it's unlikely they'd be in place at this point to have made a difference.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082280)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:17 AM
Author: disrespectful sooty chapel

The difference is that the GOP is the party of personal responsibility, so we can be sure that if Republic officials bore any blame for the Texas floods they would simply tell us

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082294)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:29 AM
Author: Light Wild State

The pretense that anyone believes anything they argue is long dead. It's all a messaging game. Oh, a mudslide killed three hikers? Guess the Dems should have thought of that when they claimed to like mud!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082320)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 12:00 PM
Author: fluffy thriller skinny woman

titcr

Logic, consistency, and objective truth are long dead. Everything, and I mean everything, is an information warfare campaign.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746820&forum_id=2...id.#49082427)