https://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/1987641350570090636

https://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/1988422716874203645

https://x.com/NickJFuentes/status/1988732431227056516

Every single one of these is pure unadulterated truth. Incredible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49424311)

CR

Trump coasts on incredible political instincts and charisma.

Nick has both of those, plus a 130+ IQ and excellent pattern recognition skills and he isn't suffering under any delusional Boomerish illusions about the world.

I love Drumpfth for what he's done (often despite his many personal flaws and notwithstanding his many retarded selfpwns), but on a long time scale, there's simply going to be no comparison.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49427958)

"Without taking action"

You mean aside from *literally* bootstrapping himself (despite having no family money or media connections and being actively blacklisted and deplatformed and debanked by powerful kikes for almost a decade starting when he was still basically a fucking child) into becoming the single most important and influential American political thought leader of his generation, all while simultaneously laying the foundation for a genuinely transformational political movement ("American First"), before the age of 30?

But otherwise CR... I mean, if you're not married with kids, you can't possibly contribute anything meaningful to the cause of right wing white nationalism (just look at that stupid worthless "Adolf Hitler" guy).

Great points all around, Ari! I bet nothing will ever come of this "Nick Fuentes" guy and soon enough he'll fade back into obscurity. Just wait two weeks. ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425641)

Lmao

Oh wow I'm so blackpilled now and I basically disdain Nick Fuentes and will ignore him going forward after reading this poast, thanks for sharing these insights with me, Moishe!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49427977)

"Haha yeah haha"

Which specific assertion, exactly, do you think was most provably stupid take here (and why)?

Don't spare me, Beez -- please be brutally specific in your pwnage, I deserve nothing less IMO, tyia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49427970)

This part seems almost as retarded as your confident assertion Donny dealmaker would eliminate taxes for earners under $150K. Btw why don’t you talk about that anymore? What happened kiddo? You were so so smug 😂

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428109)

Here are some figures (per ChatGPT):

- NF is currently 27 years old.

- NF currently has ~1 million Twitter followers (NB: He was only unbanned <18 months ago, and back when he was banned he only had like 100k follows so he's 10xed his account in less than two years).

- NF has an estimated audience of perhaps 100,000-300,000 regular viewers for his livestreams (NB: this is despite that NF still remains banned on all major streaming and social media platforms other than X, so we're literally only talking about "Rumble" streams here).

- Within the last six months, NF has appeared on Candace Owens's (5.5 million subscribers) podcast, Tucker Carlson's (5 million subscribers) podcast, and Patrick Det David's (2.8 million subscribers) podcasts, and that's just a partial sampling of his recent high-profile appearances.

- Through his "America First / Groyper" movement, NF has already directly and measurably impacted the outcome of at least one political race for elected federal office (causing Joe Kent to lose in the House race in WA in 2022).

Measured against those stats, which Zoomer political figure do you think is objectively "mort important and influential" than NF as a thought leader for the under-30 crowd?

Can't wait to hear your brilliant analysis, which will surely also be backed up by facts and figures! :)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428191)

As long as we are using AI I had ChatGPT bang out the below for me.

Nick Fuentes looks big inside his bubble but the numbers collapse the moment you compare him to actual politically influential under-30 figures. His ~1M followers on X sound huge until you note that 59 million U.S. adults under 30 use social media daily, meaning Fuentes reaches <2% of the under-30 population—and almost all of it is ideologically identical young men. Maxwell Frost reaches 100% of Congress, 330 million Americans through national media, and represents a district of 780,000 constituents, giving him institutional influence Fuentes has 0% of. David Hogg has 2.3M Twitter followers, 10M+ monthly impressions, regularly appears on networks reaching 40–60M households, and has influenced “red flag” legislation in at least 7 states—Fuentes has influenced 0 states and 0 laws. Olivia Julianna raised $2.2 million for abortion-rights groups at age 19, while Fuentes has raised $0 for any policy outcome and cannot use Stripe, PayPal, or mainstream fundraising platforms. Harry Sisson pulls 50–100M views per month across platforms vs Fuentes’s Rumble streams, which even at “300k peak views” represent 0.0009% of the U.S. population and fewer than the average views of a mid-tier Minecraft YouTuber. Being on big podcasts doesn’t equal influence: Patrick Bet-David interviews 200+ guests annually, Tucker interviews 150+, and Candace Owens interviews 100+—Fuentes is 1% of their guest lists and has produced 0 measurable downstream political effects. The Joe Kent argument fails numerically: WA-03 voted Biden +9 in 2020, and Kent lost by only 0.8%, meaning district fundamentals determined >90% of the outcome, not Fuentes’s fringe endorsement. And despite supposedly “100k–300k viewers,” Fuentes produced zero policy wins, zero elected candidates, zero institutions, zero legislation, and zero mainstream adoption of any idea. Every real metric—audience breadth, demographic reach, legislative impact, institutional access, fundraising ability, electoral success—puts Fuentes at <1–3% of the influence of the top under-30 political figures. His influence is deep in a tiny niche, not broad across the country.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428350)

LMAO

Yeah brother, DAVID HOGG is totally a far more important and influential voice in American politicans for the under-30 crowd than NF. Excellent analysis... make sure to bookmark this thread so you can bump it in 10 years when NF has receded into irrelevance and DAVID HOGG is basically running shit!

(Actual lmao, tyft I needed a chuckle today... truly nothing more whitepilling than realizing that smug retards like you genuinely have no idea what's coming down the pike, aside from recognizing the awesome power of THE DAVID HOGG JUGGERNAUT, of course... lol)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428391)

https://x.com/delgroyp/status/1958005683883851898?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49424403)

the video cuts off before he gets to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425297)

Honestly the gullibility of MAGAs must be studied. Just the dumbest motherfuckers around lmao holy shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425074)

It's amazing how Obeezy really seems to think that "MAGA Farm Animal" is some absolutely DEVASTATING killshot slur. I just imagine him chuckling at his own brilliance and wit every time he types it out; like Saliera, in the beginning of "Amadeus," pausing with pen in hand to look up and smile beatifically up at God while whispering a prayer of fervent thanks for the astounding genius with which he is certain that he has been blessed.

(The fact that literally no one else -- even other libtards here on XO -- seems to like this term enough to pick it up and use it themselves is of course totally irrelevant to assessing just how brilliant and devastating it is.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425642)

Nick is genuinely leading the charge to blow up traditional "red vs blue" retard-tier political boundaries. Just like he's pissing off and alienating lots of traditional (((Republicans))), he's also attracting and winning over quite a few traditional "liberals."

Exhibit A: Ana Kasparian basically waxes poetic about him on every other episode of "The Young Turks" these days, and 90% of the reason he's blowing up on social media lately is because tons of normies and shitlibs have discovered him and think he's funny and smart and they're unironically liking and fwding clips of him humorously bashing Jews/Israel/Zionists.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425645)

he's charismatic.

he says a lot of bullshit.

he says a lot of politically incorrect truth.

he's insightful.

he's enigmatic on purpose and doesn't believe everything he says. he leaves it up to the audience to pick and choose what they want to believe.

what am i missing?

what did i get right?

what did i get wrong?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425466)

Narrator: "...and just like that, 'Sealclubber' was never again seen poasting in that subthread."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49425647)

if you look up "misfit patriot" on X, that's basically sealclubber.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428362)

go cheat on your wife some more

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430511)

Misogynistic Christian fascist incel Nick Fuentes now claims that he was exaggerating when he said that he intends to find a 16 year-old child bride once he turns 30. For the record, he wasn't exaggerating at all:

Both sides fail to understand the Nick Fuentes phenomenon. They take his statements seriously and engage with them in good faith. But Fuentes’s stated beliefs, while abhorrent, are not best parried by taking them at face value. Instead, the Right should consider him an actor in what postmodern theorist Jean Baudrillard called “hyperreality”: a system in which the simulation of reality comes to replace reality itself.

Under conditions of hyperreality, symbols of past phenomena lose their original meaning. Emptied out, they then circulate through digital media, where they drive the discourse and, while purely derivative, still spark real emotional involvement. In this way, the hyperreal becomes “more real than real,” masking the true nature of reality.

We should understand Fuentes through this framework. He embraces taboos not because he has an authentic faith in Hitler or a deep-seated opposition to interracial marriage. He may well believe these things, of course, but that isn’t why he pushes them. Rather, he embraces taboos because doing so drives attention and creates a spectacle in digital media that benefits him.

The tone of his discourse is not authentic, serious, or reflective. It is ironic, cynical, and provocative. When Fuentes lauds Hitler and, in another interview, praises Stalin—irreconcilable ideological enemies—he is not expressing a comprehensible ideology that can be scrutinized in debate. He is engaging in a performance, which only becomes coherent when read as a demand for attention.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430269)

this line of attack is so obviously jewish and bad-faith it's comical. focus completely on his "provocative" statements in order to discredit everything, including all the truth bombs he's been dropping about jewish influence and corruption of the US.

that used to work. won't work in this era. you people are going to have to take his ideas head-on if you want to win. but you won't do that because you know you'll get smoked. so you pull bullshit like this. good luck!

"oh gawd," the nebbish new york jew exclaimed, "he's a sick pervert. plus he said he thinks stalin is cool. stalin!" (boomer zionist kike who probably had a hammer and sickle flag upon his wall in college in the 70s)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430308)

Jews: BAUDRILLARD HYPER REALITY

Nick:

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430367)

CR

Hey can you lay out the three most damning points of evidence that establish he's a Fed? TYVMIA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428572)

he has a truly sad life that no normal healthy male would want to emulate

hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49426917)

It’s over bro, but thanks for your sympathies or pity or whatever, as you cling to post-9/11 boomer republicanslop thinking.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49426940)

What about THE DAVID HOGG JUGGERNAUT???

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2#49428350

(CC: Obeezy)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49428403)

appealing to the masses is not a sign of a strong argument. being correct is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430257)

good luck, you're gonna need it lmao. i can tell you are concerned, too. you are starting to realize what's happening. you all are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430322)

but suck him off if you want to

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430329)

sorry, hope you and your kind enjoyed the last 50 years, but that's coming to an end.

this isn't even limited to MAGA, the JQ is becoming mainstream and israel is slowly becoming a third rail/litmus test in politics. the neocons at their root are jewish and they still have a hold over the republican party so it'll take some doing, but they're going to be jettisoned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796913&forum_id=2...id.#49430348)