how did you arrive at 17 as the optimal number of beefy cholos?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1192744&forum_id=#13830496)

Date: January 17th, 2010 12:18 PM

Author: MOARDONGSPLZ (Pear Chan Master Man)

It was an iterative process.

When fifteen or fewer beefy cholos were placed in our isolation barn, the amount of Wild n' Crazy Buttsex observed was unsatisfactorily low. Cholos stood about, confused as to what they should be doing. A few of them engaged in perfunctory buttsex, but by and large the group lost focus. One beefy cholo fashioned a makeshift sombrero from a nearby haystack and attempted to ride a donkey housed in the barn, which he referred to as a "burro." Several Cholos attempted to mate with the livestock rather than one another, which was unacceptable. Clearly, a higher population density was needed.

Conversely, placing twenty or more beefy cholos in the barn resulted in bedlam. Cholos ravaged the barn and one another, angrily shouting incomprehensible gibberish in their native tongue. The buttsex quickly deteriorated from Wild n' Crazy Buttsex to Extreme n' Outrageous Buttsex. Numerous test subjects were either killed in the chaos, or had to be destroyed shortly afterward because their assholes had become so stretched out that they were of no further use to the study.

We concluded that seventeen was the optimal number; it was a figure between the two "crisis" numbers, and just a shade closer to the lower bound, which results in a lower Cholo attrition rate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1192744&forum_id=#13830516)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2208070&forum_id=2...id.#22832449)