https://twitter.com/f_j_j_/status/1283349995144359937?s=19

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40680956)

https://www.gwern.net/GPT-3

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40680964)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4592961&forum_id=2#40670008

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40681176)

How long will the transition to full wire heading take? Seems like the unrest will come from the years during which automation gradually takes hold but is kind of shitty, so most people can't have normal jobs but a lot of people can -- kind of like now -- and there are large powerful segments of the population who try to stop the transition (opposition to UBI or whatever exists in a post-income society)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40682703)

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/N6vZEnCn6A95Xn39p/are-we-in-an-ai-overhang

we're at the point where pouring money into training brain-sized neural networks is likely to yield something immensely economically useful. the major tech companies doing AI research are likely to realize this, if they haven't already. GPT-3 isn't close to the limit of what we can train now using known techniques. huge budgets combined with improved, specialized hardware for training large neural networks means AGI or something to close to it is realizable in a few years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40682978)

the scary thing is that besides allowing the model to capture longer dependencies, the parameter efficiency is much greater than with a standard transformer like they used with GPT-3. it's around 10x greater. we could be looking at something with radically enhanced capabilities before too long. i still think these models won't work well in many cases until multi-modal learning can be incorporated (so it can learn real-world embeddings and actually understand what text refers to), but that's just a matter of time and throwing more computing power at the problem. i think it's fairly clear that revolutionary AI that will upset the world economy is about to arrive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40681606)

true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40681523)

https://pastebin.com/H2t5L5Nd

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40681887)

https://play.aidungeon.io/

you have to sign up to get dragon mode, but you can cancel before the free trial expires. it's unbelievably good

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40684599)

“Jack and Justin are two of the hottest and most popular guys on the block. They make the perfect couple and know exactly what each other likes. But when they meet Tyler, things get complicated. This sizzling trio enjoys their time together and both Tyler and Jack crave more. But Justin is not so easily convinced. How will this all work out?

Warning: This story contains three scorching hot guys and lots of hot and hard action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40686425)

“

Covered in swastikas and walking through the streets with a Nazi salute, Donald Trump finally did the unthinkable. The GOP nominee on Thursday released a bizarre, cringeworthy television ad—and yes, it’s as racist as you might expect.

The 2-minute clip begins with ominous music and a shot of Hillary Clinton, whose face morphs into that of a raging demon before being overtaken by a melding of the State of Liberty and the late Hollywood comedian-actor Charlie Chaplin, presumably portraying Adolf Hitler. The Donald Trump-Hitler transformation happens next.

In the ad, which the Washington Post reports was “placed on cable systems in at least four states,” a narrator ominously warns voters about the election’s stakes, stating, “On November 8th, the establishment will be defending itself, and you, the American people, will be defending our country from the greatest political crime in history.”

The ad also encourages voters to cast their ballot for the candidate who could literally be the next Hitler, though that’s not his only problem.

“In Hillary Clinton’s America, the system stays rigged against Americans,” the ad claims, “Terrorists invade our nation and advance, and law and order can’t be enforced.”

Except Clinton’s plan to defeat ISIS isn’t particularly outrageous—or radical. She has vowed to “work closely with our allies to dismantle the global terror network,” and while “we can’t let them have a safe haven,” we “must take the fight to ISIS on the ground.”

“It’s time for a tough, no-nonsense commander-in-chief who will defend our borders,” the narrator states—ignoring the fact Trump has not only used his campaign to prove he isn’t tough, but quite the opposite.

Trump’s ad concludes with a new threat to America: a nuclear arms race, because Clinton doesn’t care enough to ensure the weapons can’t fall into “the hands of the wrong people.”

In actuality, Clinton has been vocal about ensuring “that people who already have nuclear weapons, including the United States and Russia, are working to reduce their stockpiles” and will “prevent terrorists and rogue states from acquiring weapons of mass destruction.”

The Post surmises Trump’s ad was created in an attempt to capture the support of voters still undecided—though in the last month, both his polling numbers and party support have plummeted.

His call for racial profiling, in which Trump insisted he is not a bigot, is far from the only controversy to plague his campaign—and each day, his behavior only becomes more concerning, and more unhinged.

After an earlier ad warned voters about the threat of an impending crime wave should Clinton become president, many criticized its unmistakably racist overtones.

In reality, the nation’s crime rates have steadily decreased for years—but Trump’s ad seems to predict a far more sinister future for America, where police officers are gunned down in cold blood and inner cities resemble Iraq or Afghanistan.

Hillary Clinton is campaigning on a message of love and inclusiveness, while Donald Trump wants to divide and conquer, and scare voters into believing the country is on the brink of collapse.

Whether you support Clinton or Trump, the choice is clear—at least, we hope it is.

Please share this article to show Trump’s new racist ad to everyone, because it is disgusting!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40686444)

https://twitter.com/XiXiDu/status/1288517615405629440/photo/1

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4594353&forum_id=2...id.#40688086)