...	Vigorous Canary Boistinker	07/01/25
trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is r...	Henna new version	07/01/25
Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. ...	Vigorous Canary Boistinker	07/01/25
James Bond surfing in die another day	motley hell	07/01/25
Not even as bad as you’d think	Vigorous Canary Boistinker	07/01/25

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:13 AM Author: Vigorous Canary Boistinker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2...id.#49062617)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:37 AM Author: Henna new version trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is ruinous. This is why practical effects are necessary. While the FX from 80s monster movies have definitely aged they are at least still watchable and appreciable for the craft that went into them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2...id.#49062648)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:28 AM Author: Vigorous Canary Boistinker Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. Good CGI isn’t even that expensive. Westerners just suck at making things efficiently. District 9 looked impressive iirc and it had a lowish budget iirc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2...id.#49063141)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:44 AM Author: motley hell James Bond surfing in die another day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2...id.#49062660)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: Vigorous Canary Boistinker Not even as bad as you’d think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2...id.#49063133)