Alito EVISCERATES shitlib atty in oral arguments re: trannies (link)
| vivacious useless nursing home | 01/13/26 | | motley shrine blood rage | 01/13/26 | | milky vibrant personal credit line library | 01/13/26 | | Charismatic theater | 01/13/26 | | adventurous sex offender meetinghouse | 01/13/26 | | Charismatic theater | 01/13/26 | | Seedy Gaming Laptop | 01/13/26 | | Charismatic theater | 01/13/26 | | cruel-hearted peach ticket booth | 01/13/26 | | Charismatic theater | 01/13/26 | | cruel-hearted peach ticket booth | 01/13/26 | | Diverse spot | 01/13/26 | | milky vibrant personal credit line library | 01/15/26 | | Seedy Gaming Laptop | 01/16/26 | | Confused mental disorder | 01/13/26 | | galvanic whorehouse | 01/13/26 | | adventurous sex offender meetinghouse | 01/13/26 | | federal coldplay fan | 01/15/26 | | plum sinister property psychic | 01/13/26 | | Seedy Gaming Laptop | 01/13/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/13/26 | | Overrated ladyboy | 01/13/26 | | autistic business firm circlehead | 01/13/26 | | Heady bat-shit-crazy locus | 01/13/26 | | cruel-hearted peach ticket booth | 01/13/26 | | boyish up-to-no-good site | 01/13/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/13/26 | | federal coldplay fan | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/15/26 | | federal coldplay fan | 01/15/26 | | plum sinister property psychic | 01/15/26 | | Talking Place Of Business | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/15/26 | | Talking Place Of Business | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/15/26 | | White Bisexual Digit Ratio Son Of Senegal | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/15/26 | | plum sinister property psychic | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/16/26 | | plum sinister property psychic | 01/16/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/16/26 | | cruel-hearted peach ticket booth | 01/16/26 | | Heady bat-shit-crazy locus | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/15/26 | | Heady bat-shit-crazy locus | 01/15/26 | | Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency | 01/16/26 | | Heady bat-shit-crazy locus | 01/16/26 | | cruel-hearted peach ticket booth | 01/16/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/15/26 | | blathering swashbuckling idea he suggested | 01/15/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/16/26 | | Charismatic theater | 01/16/26 | | Overrated ladyboy | 01/16/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/16/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/16/26 | | Canary Godawful Telephone State | 01/16/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:12 PM Author: milky vibrant personal credit line library
Both the attorney and Alito seem stupid in this exchange. No one making these policies, and no one who fights against these policies, thinks that a boy saying "lol i'm trans now" makes them trans. But both the attorney and Alito are taking the opposition position.
It's not discrimination against transgender people unless the people are transgender.
This used to be a forum for smart people, and this error is glaringly obvious. I'm pretty disappointed. Why the fuck do I still post, it's just divorcés, unemployed, suicidal, losers with fat mantits, and morons
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49586451) |
 |
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:20 PM Author: Charismatic theater
"No one making these policies, and no one who fights against these policies, thinks that a boy saying "lol i'm trans now" makes them trans."
are you rejecting the self-identification standard for trans? because i think i hear a lot of libs saying self-identification and self-declaration does indeed make someone trans.
i noticed that the lawyer backed off and would only say "i would respect that person's pronouns," which is a massive retreat, right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49586465) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:02 AM Author: milky vibrant personal credit line library
> are you rejecting the self-identification standard for trans?
I'm rejecting the standard for believing someone is "just trust me bro." I've never agreed with this position with the shittiest of shitlibs.
Of course the real solution here is to make stalls all unisex and not have those pedotile gaps around the doors and big rape gap underneath that was only ever invented so chomos could chomo.
Then make all sinks communal. That reduces the size requirements of bathrooms considerably.
This is literally only a problem in shiTTTy amerikkka, even third world countries like germany do this right
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49591374) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:08 AM Author: Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency
All of this shit is so retarded. There shouldn't even be an argument about this crap. There is no such thing as a tranny. It's fucking mental illness wherein the "tranny" demands that the entire world play along with their delusion.
It is very obviously a symptom of a much deeper underlying problem and should be treated as such. Instead, libs seem to think that we need to give each and every one of these "transpeople" their own personal Shutter Island experience 24/7.
And the GOP doesn't help when they frame the issue as "keep men out of women's sports." It's pathetic cuck faggot bullshit that gives all of the framing power to the most mentally ill people in the world.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49591386) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 4:54 PM Author: Ocher Foreskin International Law Enforcement Agency
"but i don’t see how it’s a mistake for the gop to use it."
My beef is that that the GOP doesn't attack the underlying premise itself. The GOP's tactics tacitly give credibility to the idea of "trans" to begin with. What needs to happen is a non-stop brutal attack on the idea that someone can be "trans" to begin with.
The reality is that it is incredibly simple to attack the trans concept because it has no merit whatsoever. And the amount of damage it does to society is directly related to its obvious absurdity. It is no different in concept from anorexia ("I'm so fat, I can't eat food anymore, I need to lose weight and be thin") -- and we aren't running around talking about "Anorexic Rights are Human Rights." Obviously both issues stem from deeper underlying issues (and are absolutely influenced by increasingly unnatural external factors.)
The fact that people are supposed to sit around pretending that some dude named Brian is really Brianna (and "always has been") because "they" said they "feel like a woman" is beyond the pale. And people who know better are such fucking cowards that they don't just say:
"YOU CANNOT EVEN DESCRIBE WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO BE YOU, LET ALONE WHAT IT COULD POSSIBLY FEEL LIKE TO BE SOMEONE ELSE. NO ONE CAN DO THIS. ANY DESCRIPTION OF HOW YOU FEEL IS NEBULOUS AND IMPOSSIBLE TO PUT INTO WORDS THAT MEAN ANYTHING CONCRETE. AT BEST YOU CAN DESCRIBE YOUR EMOTIONAL STATE, BUT TO EVEN DESCRIBE HOW YOU ARE A MAN OR WOMAN IN A REAL AND PROVABLE WAY INCLUDES A DESCRIPTION OF YOUR GENITALS AND CHROMOSOMES. FUCK YOU."
Mind you, "trans" advocates argue extensively that gender roles aren't real *but then lean on gender role descriptions to show how someone is trans.*
I understand how people, perhaps like you, argue "well, the average midwit normie isn't able to handle reality and this helps get them comfortable with pushing back on a problematic issue." But it's wrong in this case. This actually does far more to normalize "trans" bullshit than not talking about the issue at all. Because this basically says "no, no you can do this if you're an adult, just don't play in my kid's sports." LOL wtf are you shitting me with this?
This is being argued in the Supreme Court and well meaning people are going to be sitting around their dinner tables talking about the merits of the arguments when there shouldn't even be a case to begin with! No fucking way James Madison would've been pushing for the judicial branch had he foreseen anything even remotely approaching this insanity.
At the end of both sides' arguments, a reanimated Pol Pot should've entered the room and taken care of both sides with total brutality.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49592308) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 9:54 PM Author: plum sinister property psychic
"(I think most people could actually tolerate the rare person who wants to cross-dress)"
those are the original trannies--transvestites
they were weird
i always assumed they were a subset of homos, the drag queens
i don't know when they disappeared and became transsexuals. i think it was at the beginning of blm when they had trannies on their list of goals, as if being black and being a tranny were partners in victimhood. that would be around trayvon.
i don't know if that is really when it began, but that's when i noticed
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49592993) |
 |
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:57 PM Author: plum sinister property psychic
the other touchstone is the proliferation of tranny bathrooms
"4. 2012–2016: Major expansion in schools and workplaces
This is when the issue became nationally visible.
Important milestones
2012: The EEOC ruled that denying restroom access to a transgender employee could be sex discrimination (Macy v. DOJ). [ihs.gov]
2015: EEOC reinforced that forcing transgender employees into separate bathrooms was discriminatory.
2016:
The Obama administration issued guidance stating that schools receiving federal funds must allow students to use bathrooms consistent with their gender identity.
Numerous states and cities passed laws requiring single‑user restrooms to be labeled gender‑neutral (e.g., California’s Equal Restroom Access Act). [lawshun.com]
🚩 This period also triggered the rise of so‑called “bathroom bills”, both for and against transgender access."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2...id.#49594373) |
|
|