The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Tucker is releasing a new documentary on the truth about 9/11; here's my predict
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| lfo | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| Carpathian man, US Citizen | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:42 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK ion (NSAM)
He'll say the FBI and CIA were running parallel ops that neither was aware of. However, because both agencies were recruiting middle eastern talent, they were tapping into the same network of Saudi families. It was through backdoor chatter by the families that Bin Laden could see what both agencies were doing. The families themselves may not have known, which is why it was probably GOOD that Bush flew them out.
That's why it was called an "intelligence failure," and that's why one of the reforms that came out of the 9/11 commission was to create a Director of National Intelligence, who would have visibility over these agencies that they themselves lacked.
I don't know wtf else Tucker will say, but he'll say the above. |
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:43 PM Author: lfo Tucker "discovering" Loose Change is something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768246&forum_id=2...id.#49227020) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:46 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK He got burned by low-rent FBI toads. Once the government became disloyal to him, he lost any reason to maintain his loyalty to them. I don't think he's been inside the CIA for at least a decade, but he maintained his loyalty until Patel outed him.
What he's doing with his newfound "freedom" is really quite honorable: he's rehashing old news to line his pockets, harming no one, and hopefully clearing up public confusion so that future historians aren't stuck with Alex Jones/Building 7 shit (Bldg 7 is super easy to understand btw). |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:47 PM Author: Carpathian man, US Citizen I'm sure that we all know it was Israel by now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768246&forum_id=2...id.#49227023) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:47 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK You don't know how it was executed or what really happened though. That's the thing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5768246&forum_id=2...id.#49227024) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2025 6:55 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK BTW lol@ Building 7mos. There was every reason to do a controlled demolition under the circumstances. They absolutely SHOULD have done that for public safety reasons. If the building was full of old government records it may well have been rigged to blow, what did you expect them to design for a building in Manhttan to store government records during the Vietnam war? That building was built when Kissinger was running shit. Of course it would be pre-rigged to blow in a worst case scenario.
Imagine an alternative universe where Silverstein said "nah, let's try to save Building 7, we can do it." You're only inviting a potentially more chaotic and hazardous collapse at a later time. If you have to send in demolition crews six months later, that's risker than if you just blow up the building now and make it collapse internally. The risk with other forms of collapse is what you saw with the twin towers: debris (and dust) goes flying everywhere. Controlled demolition like you saw with Building 7 makes it collapse inward so it's all nice and clean. It's better for the rescue crews, the first responders, the future cleanup crews, all of it. It also ensures the government records get destroyed. |