was there theoretically a time in history when "women" weren't complete shit
| SATANIC TONICS LLC INC | 05/11/25 | | \"''"\'""\''\"\''"\' | 05/11/25 | | SATANIC TONICS LLC INC | 05/11/25 | | \"''"\'""\''\"\''"\' | 05/11/25 | | Parashat Emor | 05/11/25 | | SATANIC TONICS LLC INC | 05/11/25 | | butt cheeks | 05/11/25 | | The Mercantilist Policy April | 05/11/25 | | Parashat Emor | 05/11/25 | | cowgod | 05/11/25 | | SATANIC TONICS LLC INC | 05/11/25 | | Parashat Emor | 05/11/25 | | cowgod | 05/11/25 | | SATANIC TONICS LLC INC | 05/11/25 | | Parashat Emor | 05/11/25 | | - ) | 05/11/25 | | grrr women grrrrrrrrrr | 05/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 11th, 2025 9:53 AM Author: cowgod ( )
Martin Luther (1483–1546):
“Let them bear children till they die of it; that is what they are for.”
Aristotle’s views, revived in universities, cast women as deformed men—“passive” vessels incapable of reason.
Malleus Maleficarum (1487): A best-selling witch-hunting manual claimed women are inherently more prone to evil, lust, and deception.
Schopenhauer: “Woman is an animal with long hair and short thoughts.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5723538&forum_id=2...id.#48921246)
|
|
|