The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
If GOP bill put 50% tax on income above $1 million it would get 90% support
| Pale Provocative Hall Foreskin | 06/04/25 |
| mahogany 180 french chef locus | 06/04/25 |
| Pale Provocative Hall Foreskin | 06/04/25 |
| Plum Patrolman | 06/04/25 |
| honey-headed public bath jap | 06/04/25 |
| honey-headed public bath jap | 06/04/25 |
| irradiated avocado library | 06/04/25 |
| excitant crawly nibblets | 06/04/25 |
| honey-headed public bath jap | 06/04/25 |
| White karate | 06/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 4th, 2025 1:15 AM Author: Pale Provocative Hall Foreskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985355) |
Date: June 4th, 2025 1:18 AM Author: mahogany 180 french chef locus No one earns that much in ordinary income except maybe some professional service types but very few
The problem with taxing wealthy on income is it’s mostly cap gains
Taxing cap gains at high rates creates all kinds of inefficiencies
In a sane world we’d have very high consumption taxes on luxury / rich people stuff but we are a dumb people |
 |
Date: June 4th, 2025 1:20 AM Author: Pale Provocative Hall Foreskin even if it's a small percent, what exactly is the downside re doing this?
some states do have luxury taxes on shit like yachts and stuff. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 1:49 AM Author: Plum Patrolman What about a tax on Tall men? Or short men with no nougat? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985376) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 9:20 AM Author: honey-headed public bath jap France tried this shit years ago and they realized there were like 15 people in the entire country who actual had reported incomes over that amount. in america's case it's basically an asshole tax on athletes and movie stars and everyone else with a brain will be able to get around it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985699) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 5:49 AM Author: honey-headed public bath jap It also would barely raise any meaningful amount of money (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985510) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 6:05 AM Author: irradiated avocado library the fuck are you talking about 🤔 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985515) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 7:01 AM Author: excitant crawly nibblets shitlibs obssession with higher taxes esp on the "rich" is such absurd garbage. when will idiots realize taxation isnt normal for 99.99% of human history u werent taxing every god damn thing
taxes particularly on the mega rich wont amount to shit and will just reduce their economic output, u shld be taxing the most productive richest ppl the LEAST, any society is really functioning only cause of the top 1%, everyone else is just a furking peon retard |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 9:42 AM Author: honey-headed public bath jap rare credited TT poast (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985822) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2025 9:44 AM Author: White karate yeah taxes are a relatively modern thing if you ignore the vast historical records of tax collectors and references to them spanning the middle east, asia, and europe. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733175&forum_id=2...id.#48985830) |