The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Rate the vindictive faggotry of Rob Manfred's letter re: reinstating Pete Rose
| zarathustra | 05/13/25 |
| zarathustra | 05/13/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 13th, 2025 5:08 PM Author: zarathustra “In my view, a determination must be made regarding how the phrase ‘permanently ineligible’ should be interpreted in light of the purposes and policies behind Rule 21, which are to: (1) protect the game from individuals who pose a risk to the integrity of the sport by prohibiting the participation of such individuals; and (2) create a deterrent effect that reduces the likelihood of future violations by others. In my view, once an individual has passed away, the purposes of Rule 21 have been served. Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game. Moreover, it is hard to conceive of a penalty that has more deterrent effect than one that lasts a lifetime with no reprieve. Therefore, I have concluded that permanent ineligibility ends upon the passing of the disciplined individual, and Mr. Rose will be removed from the permanently ineligible list.”
in other words this was never about the principle of the matter, it was about being a petty and vindictive bitch to make sure that the man was six feet under before he could enjoy the honor of the HOF while still on this earth, and to ensure he died in shame. stuff this man in a locker. |
Date: May 13th, 2025 9:55 PM Author: zarathustra (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5724570&forum_id=2...id.#48928501) |