Rate ChatGPT's evaluation of my brief:
| Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 05/14/25 | | scholarship | 05/14/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 05/14/25 | | dollar menu of items that cost 5 dollars each | 05/14/25 | | scholarship | 05/14/25 | | metaphysics is fallow | 05/14/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 05/14/25 | | sam hyde inseminating boner police's mouth via gjr | 05/14/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 05/14/25 | | sam hyde inseminating boner police's mouth via gjr | 05/14/25 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 05/14/25 | | ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. | 05/14/25 | | metaphysics is fallow | 05/14/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: May 14th, 2025 4:39 PM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband
Tbf, it also gave this feedback, which seems cr:
General Revision Plan:
Improve flow and conciseness – Some paragraphs are quite long and could be broken up for better readability.
Clarify dense legal reasoning – A few parts could benefit from plainer transitions or summaries for non-specialist readers (like judges who may be less familiar with RPA).
Tighten rhetorical flourishes – The brief has a few passages that may come across as overly combative or speculative (e.g., comments on opposing counsel's habits or court experience). These can be dialed down slightly to maintain credibility and professionalism.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725001&forum_id=2...id.#48930905) |
Date: May 14th, 2025 9:39 PM
Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,..
Be careful about using it as a tool to judge quality of your work or whether something is reasonable. It almost always says whatever you’ve done is really good and makes sense. Which could be in true in some context, but you can test pretty easily some things that would absolutely be bad for your career to send and it will be like “sure! Go ahead! Making great points!”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725001&forum_id=2...id.#48931635) |
|
|