\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The "planes" struck by Ukraine were decoys. Otherwise we'd have full nuke launch

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit...
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
r u an NSAM alt
magenta stimulating cuck
  06/01/25
Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a s...
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
yea
Nubile Casino
  06/01/25
It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber ar...
tan hairy legs
  06/01/25
It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of ...
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
cr
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
What is the virtue in a proportional response?
Slippery Faggot Firefighter
  06/01/25
Putin is a Boomer
tan hairy legs
  06/01/25
What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to ...
Hairraiser cheese-eating mood
  06/01/25
He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were da...
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia g...
Hairraiser cheese-eating mood
  06/01/25
(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterr...
orange nibblets
  06/01/25
lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear asse...
Irradiated Public Bath Windowlicker
  06/01/25
Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO ...
hideous marvelous fat ankles pit
  06/01/25
They don't have decoy planes
Dun Mentally Impaired Gas Station Idiot
  06/01/25
Link?
orange nibblets
  06/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:06 PM
Author: orange nibblets

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit on its nuclear triad is telling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978827)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: magenta stimulating cuck

r u an NSAM alt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978833)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:19 PM
Author: orange nibblets

Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a successful strike on their nuclear triad all the time; it was no big deal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978858)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:35 PM
Author: Nubile Casino

yea

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978902)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:29 PM
Author: tan hairy legs

It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber arm, and there's no reason to think that Ukraine won't be able to do exactly the same thing in 6 months. Or to go after all civilian air travel.

Can Putin get away with just ordering an (ineffective) Oreshnik strike in retaliation for this? Can he get away with it again next time when Ukraine does exactly the same thing again?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978887)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:30 PM
Author: orange nibblets

It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of reason to believe they won't even be able to hit decoys next time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978891)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:53 PM
Author: orange nibblets

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48978939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:09 PM
Author: Slippery Faggot Firefighter

What is the virtue in a proportional response?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979298)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:14 PM
Author: tan hairy legs

Putin is a Boomer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979311)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:06 PM
Author: Hairraiser cheese-eating mood

What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to have it. It doesn’t make much sense to just bomb it out of existence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979296)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:15 PM
Author: orange nibblets

He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were damaged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979313)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: Hairraiser cheese-eating mood

What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia gets nuked as well. You seem dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979315)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: orange nibblets

(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterrence)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979324)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: Irradiated Public Bath Windowlicker

lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear assets were damaged because Putin didn't start a war with NATO?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979316)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: hideous marvelous fat ankles pit

Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO helped Ukraine nuke Russia last year, Russia did nothing, and none of the nuclear detonation surveillance stations reported anything because of a conspiracy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979323)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:21 PM
Author: Dun Mentally Impaired Gas Station Idiot

They don't have decoy planes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979327)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:22 PM
Author: orange nibblets

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2...id.#48979329)