How does blowing up billion$ in ordnance 6,000 miles put America first?
| bearded buck-toothed nibblets brunch | 06/23/25 | | frozen halford | 06/23/25 | | bearded buck-toothed nibblets brunch | 06/23/25 | | frozen halford | 06/23/25 | | bearded buck-toothed nibblets brunch | 06/23/25 | | twinkling multi-billionaire mad cow disease | 06/23/25 | | frozen halford | 06/23/25 | | bearded buck-toothed nibblets brunch | 06/23/25 | | twinkling multi-billionaire mad cow disease | 06/23/25 | | fiercely-loyal wrinkle | 06/23/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 23rd, 2025 9:53 AM Author: frozen halford
thats akin to a sunk cost fallacy. its not like we're donating ww2 ordinance. this is some of our latest shit. and its not like a 30klb bomb is going obsolete soon.
if we wanted to "rotate" we could have just donated to israel. which i wouldn't support either, but it's significantly preferrable to getting directly involved, in the same way donating to ukraine is preferrable to bombing russia.
we're so cucked as a country. fortunately the younger wing of the MAGA movement is against this and i have some hope that president juris doctor vance less of a neocon boomer than Trump.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5742164&forum_id=2...id.#49042210) |
|
|