The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Rambunctious kitchen | 01/06/26 | | exciting space mediation | 01/06/26 | | mauve trip turdskin | 01/06/26 | | exciting space mediation | 01/06/26 | | mauve trip turdskin | 01/06/26 | | exciting space mediation | 01/06/26 | | Rambunctious kitchen | 01/06/26 | | exciting space mediation | 01/06/26 | | Rambunctious kitchen | 01/06/26 | | disturbing vibrant sweet tailpipe degenerate | 01/07/26 | | Useless box office | 01/06/26 | | onyx duck-like jew | 01/06/26 | | mauve trip turdskin | 01/06/26 | | painfully honest translucent field | 01/06/26 | | mauve trip turdskin | 01/06/26 | | coiffed chad | 01/06/26 | | Thirsty fantasy-prone cuckoldry state | 01/06/26 | | Chartreuse gaping | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: exciting space mediation
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2...id.#49568134) |
|
|