Reagan had a Alex Keaton moment in the 80s, but it was the exception.

Libs completely self-pwned starting around 2012 by becoming the party of extremely hideous people, like men in dresses and morbidly obese people with face piercings and such. And their brand aged rapidly, with many of the recent protests being average age 65. They became dour and ugly

A super hot 20 year old girl or guy over the last few years probably supported Trump. Becky and Chad, etc.

Unappealing as the Bad Bunny show was to XO, it was young and bouncy and sexy. Spicy girls in short-shorts with tits jiggling. Fiesta atmosphere. An implicit fuck-you to the president. And a generic "the answer is love" ethos that normies adore.

The parade of flags also is good aesthetics. People love internationalism when its olympics-coded, or Its-a-small-world, or whatever.

In sum, if Libs doubled down on sexy parties and having sex and attractive people and having FUN, they would easily reclaim what they've lost since Obama.

(Pro tip libs, you should abandon the man-on-man grinding, or at least put it in the shadows a bit).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657588)

but my OP is to point in the direction of where libs ought to go, even if the path ahead is difficult

bracketing my own desire that libs be encamped and gassed, if I were advising them Id say "good start with the bad bunny thing, you want to keep branding with parties and daisy-duked cinnamon girls, and shut up the anti-sex feminists. Stop with the dourness and crack open a Corona or Modelo"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657645)

That's why the left has stayed ugly. That's why the video game girls have to be ugly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657744)

Bioleninism took root in the early 2010s and never let go. It's all a revenge plot by those who were not selected by Chad. But to my earlier point they can have hot Latinas and black women twerking because Yass queen is acceptable. It's an out for the blue hairs. It's okay to be hot if you're brown.

The only other carve out in the bioleninist hierarchy is, for some unknown reason, Taylor Swift who has been given a pass. Probably because she's not super hot, lib white women adore her and live by her every word etc. Something about her being the patron saint of wine ladies and brunch moms...

Those are two major exceptions so maybe they can play off of that. The Yass Kweening will continue until morale improves.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657751)

Libs became moralist scolds and so got stuck with their worst nightmare. Even punishing-ICE leads nowhere bc its just a negative reaction. "We are the party of saying ITS WRONG WHAT ICE DID" may win in a particular year, but it sucks and will die

The way forward for them is to reclaim "it's okay to have a party, where beautiful people fuck"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657597)

https://x.com/3yearletterman/status/2020670826240950343?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49657748)

Key details regarding his public identity:

Sexual Orientation: He has confirmed he is straight, though he has expressed that his sexuality does not define him.

LGBTQ+ Allyship: He is a vocal supporter of the LGBTQ+ community and has included non-binary and queer themes in his work.

Public Image: He is known for challenging traditional masculine norms in the Latin music industry, including wearing gender-fluid fashion. 

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49659873)

So while you make a good point for if Democrats wanted to be a well liked brand, that's not their goal. They want to destroy traditional America. Realistically, they're succeeding.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832831&forum_id=2...id.#49659869)