\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The GOP cutting Medicaid/welfare is kind of the opposite of what we need

'UBI' fantasies have been around for a long time, and most w...
indecent bearded prole range
  06/03/25
no one has said a single fucking word about military spendin...
Pearly Startling Space
  06/03/25
sure they have we need to reduce fraud and waste by 100-2...
Chartreuse native
  06/03/25
the broader issue is that federal government revenue is limi...
indecent bearded prole range
  06/03/25
USG pulled in $40bn in tariff revenue over the last two mont...
Chartreuse native
  06/03/25
"we"
180 transparent idea he suggested locus
  06/03/25
actually we do need to cut all benefits spending and then ki...
silver heady genital piercing
  06/03/25
medicaid is for working-aged people. medicare (not being cu...
indecent bearded prole range
  06/03/25
medicaid is overwhelmingly nons i don't even support it f...
silver heady genital piercing
  06/03/25
...
twinkling coffee pot
  06/04/25
Huge % of Medicaid spending is for nursing home care and hom...
Pink shrine lettuce
  06/04/25
But old rich boomers need tax relief!
nudist bateful pisswyrm
  06/03/25
“i suspect that things like the medicaid cuts are spec...
Soul-stirring dull new version telephone
  06/03/25
...
nudist bateful pisswyrm
  06/03/25
How about you idiots wait until there’s actually a sig...
Mewling stead antidepressant drug
  06/03/25
90% of GOP voters are on medicaid/welfare/other gov. subsidi...
Cowardly Cerise Hairy Legs Faggot Firefighter
  06/03/25
Are you going to sit there and tell us that the inflated GDP...
Mewling stead antidepressant drug
  06/04/25
Why wouldn’t you cut it? It seems like an obvious one ...
plum place of business plaza
  06/04/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:03 PM
Author: indecent bearded prole range

'UBI' fantasies have been around for a long time, and most were retarded. but it's clear that one of the early and most pronounced effects of AI will be to consolidate money into fewer individual spenders. a lot of the job market in general is a soft welfare program and is not strictly 'necessary,' a fact which AI is making easier to expose.

all the usual economic blather about propensity to spend and so on actually applies here, since having a smaller class with more monetary 'depth' is going to pull an economic choke-chain against the throats of all the other spenders, and increasingly so over time.

i suspect that things like the medicaid cuts are specifically designed to induce young competent men to join the military, but the overall direction of restricting capital flows toward poors is kind of unproductive. they should probably be topped up here and there with enough cash to keep buying stupid shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984689)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:11 PM
Author: Pearly Startling Space

no one has said a single fucking word about military spending

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984715)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:13 PM
Author: Chartreuse native

sure they have

we need to reduce fraud and waste by 100-200 billion, but it needs to be a trillion a year to prepare for what’s coming

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984719)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:14 PM
Author: indecent bearded prole range

the broader issue is that federal government revenue is limited by the tax system. the question is whether or not the feds will eventually need to requisition more resources from private firms to keep money circulating within the broader economy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984724)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:21 PM
Author: Chartreuse native

USG pulled in $40bn in tariff revenue over the last two months

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984740)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:14 PM
Author: 180 transparent idea he suggested locus

"we"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984723)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:22 PM
Author: silver heady genital piercing

actually we do need to cut all benefits spending and then kill all boomers

hope this helps you adjust your "analysis" properly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984743)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:23 PM
Author: indecent bearded prole range

medicaid is for working-aged people. medicare (not being cut) is the boomer program.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984744)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:29 PM
Author: silver heady genital piercing

medicaid is overwhelmingly nons

i don't even support it for white people. the "experiment" in post-malthusian surplus has completely failed. we're literally genetically regressing, even apart from the ridiculous, comical overall dysgenic machine of mass immigration + a ballooning welfare state

enough. all the smart people are thinking the same thing. make people fight for their survival and maybe they'll find that they actually have something to live for other than video games and social media scrolling and carbs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984762)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2025 11:33 AM
Author: twinkling coffee pot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48986150)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2025 11:32 AM
Author: Pink shrine lettuce

Huge % of Medicaid spending is for nursing home care and home health services for elderly people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48986147)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:24 PM
Author: nudist bateful pisswyrm

But old rich boomers need tax relief!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984746)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:38 PM
Author: Soul-stirring dull new version telephone

“i suspect that things like the medicaid cuts are specifically designed to induce young competent men to join the military,”

You’re giving far too much credit to the Neanderthals that dominate MAGA and the GOP. The people disproportionately affected by the cuts are groups they don’t like. They need cuts so they can free up enough room to pass the Byrd Rule for their tax cuts. A lot of their supporters will get caught up in the cuts too but they’re too far down the culture war rabbit hole to notice.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984801)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:41 PM
Author: nudist bateful pisswyrm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984808)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:46 PM
Author: Mewling stead antidepressant drug

How about you idiots wait until there’s actually a significant amount of unemployment before you bring this shit up? Because unless something major changes it’ll just cause the national debt to increase by 2x in a few years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984820)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2025 7:47 PM
Author: Cowardly Cerise Hairy Legs Faggot Firefighter

90% of GOP voters are on medicaid/welfare/other gov. subsidies.

even just living in a red state is essentially living off welfare from productive states.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48984822)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2025 11:36 AM
Author: Mewling stead antidepressant drug

Are you going to sit there and tell us that the inflated GDP generated from stuff like pharma and “finance” and government spending on degrees for Losers shouldn’t be handicapped somewhat when you compare it with Iowa agriculture or something

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48986163)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2025 12:04 PM
Author: plum place of business plaza

Why wouldn’t you cut it? It seems like an obvious one to cut. The recipients see no meaningful improvement to longevity or quality of life. It doesn’t stimulate medical innovation because the high administrative and participation costs eat up profits for treating people. Even its supporters struggle to find ways of defending it and rely heavily on type II errors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733077&forum_id=2E#48986246)