---

(no title yet, no summary yet)

Charlie Kirk was assassinated today; I wasn’t sure how I would emotionally react to it, but my feeling of being disturbed deepened throughout the day. This post is in a vein similar to other posts about other Current Things that bothered me - for example, the Luigi Mangioni assassination of the healthcare executive, Putin’s FSB buddies blowing their Wagner enemies out of the sky after luring them into a trap, and the Trump assassination attempt in Butler come to mind. My track record has been decent but not perfect on this stuff: I was very certain the assassin of the healthcare executive would be tracked down early on because it was clearly a lone wolf attacker, a populist against a rich and connected executive, in one of the most surveilled places on the planet, with some of the greatest technology to deploy if the elites really wanted to catch the guy, and all he had to do was One Wrong Move to be tracked down; so that was a solid correct prediction on my part. I don’t follow Russian politics super closely but even Rurik was surprised at Putin’s deception, where only a short time before Wagner had challenged Putin’s power - the lesson was “if you’re going to strike at the king, you better not miss.” Wagner went at it half assed and paid the price. And for the Trump assassination attempt, I was very certain at first that it was real - between the dead Trumpenproles and the timing, which was right before the RNC and right before Trump had picked his VP, if it had killed him it would have resulted in maximum Republican chaos - but given the total lack of investigation or real punishment for the Secret Service (which was definitely in on the attempt), given how quickly Trump’s ear wound “healed”, given Trump almost never talks about it, etc., I am much less certain now than I was then that things were on the up and up and the whole thing could have been faked to juice Trump’s campaign (although he was in the lead already against Kamala) and to make him appear as a kind of quasi-messianic figure to his supporters (such as the famous Trump raising his fist with the American flag in the background as he was covered in a smear of blood).

But all three of these events were pretty easily explainable on their face. The Trump event was either faked or instigated by the FBI/CIA to take him out, the Mangione attack was pretty clear with a basic explanation, and the Putin/Prigozhin stuff was pretty easily explainable as a power play too.

Here, there is not a clearcut explanation for Kirk’s assassination, and that is what makes it deeply unsettling. He was an effective organizer but otherwise very milquetoast, a gentile Zionist culture warrior gatekeeping version of Ben Shapiro, so it’s hard to think what the motive would be to assassinate him. This was not a box on my “political bingo” card, although I predicted that political assassinations would increase as neoliberal feudalism sets into place and desperation increases. I mostly feel bad for Kirk’s two young children. Fathers are irreplaceable.

Sure, maybe the shooter will be found and the explanation will become more clear - and hey, at least it’s not a question of whether Kirk’s death was faked or not, the guy’s dead (and the shot was brutal). At the time of this writing two guys were arrested and then released when they weren’t the shooter; there are a couple of videos of a dot movement on a roof a couple hundred yards out which was likely the shooter, and some audio reports that the guy was covered in black and wearing a mask. He took one shot and then immediately ran. I don’t know how many video cameras were in the area or what tools the FBI can use to figure out who the shooter was, if they even want to find him - after the Butler attack the FBI scrubbed the attacker’s living quarters and the crime scene, and basically no other information has been released about him. This may be a black hole where the killer simply gets away with it and people move on to the next shiny Current Thing very quickly.

Here are some possible explanations for the murder:

1. Deranged pro-tranny shitlib culture warrior taking out anti-tranny "conservative" culture warrior - but shot was 200 yards away, could a deranged tranny culture warrior pull off the shot?

2. Kirk was an effective Republican organizer and this was a "deep state" attack to hurt Republican chances in 2026 and 2028

3. Kirk was secretly going off the Zionist bandwagon secretly and slowly and he was nipped in the bud by Mossad. Although Kirk apparently kept his views close to the chest, he certainly had a handler (a requirement of being elevated into the mainstream spotlight) and his full electronic activities would have been closely tracked. He was in his young 30s and his views were still evolving - the fact that he hired Blake Neff, the fired Tucker Carlson writer for wrongthink, showed that Kirk had some deeper views than the lame culture warrior stuff he expressed publicly.

4. Kirk was moderate and encouraged reaching across the aisle and the upper elites consistently prefers division and has their media promote it at every turn; this removes an element of moderation from the discourse. This would be important if the elites want to push the U.S. into some sort of civil disturbance or greater (see also the Ukrainian woman killed, if she was real anyway - see NOTE).

The disturbing thing about all of this is the possible motivations for the attack are quite disparate. One thing I am certain of is that the upper elites are using a supercharged version of LLMs to plan their strategies longterm, and it isn’t always clear how a particular action will be used in this plan on a granular level - they are using strategies to keep the public off-kilter. This attack may ultimately retain a giant question mark on it, even though it hurts Republican organization, it eliminates a potential future dissident in the making, and it increases the temperature of the public discourse. It seems like regardless of who was behind this particular attack, the upper elites will benefit.

Thanks for reading.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253290)

enjoy!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253301)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253342)

what is your note on the ukrainian girl not being real?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253318)

okay, most played along

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253680)

---

Summary: Kirk’s killing unsettles because it resists easy narrative. Other recent assassinations and attempts each had clear explanations. Here, the motives fragment: was it chaos, factional discipline, betrayal, or the elimination of a reconciler? The very lack of clarity reveals the structure: elites thrive on opacity, division, and the silencing of moderates.

Charlie Kirk was assassinated today; I wasn’t sure how I would emotionally react to it, but my feeling of being disturbed deepened throughout the day. This post is in a vein similar to other posts about other Current Things that bothered me - for example, the Luigi Mangioni assassination of the healthcare executive, Putin’s FSB buddies blowing their Wagner enemies out of the sky after luring them into a trap, and the Trump assassination attempt in Butler come to mind. My track record has been decent but not perfect on this stuff: I was very certain the assassin of the healthcare executive would be tracked down early on because it was clearly a lone wolf attacker, a populist against a rich and connected executive, in one of the most surveilled places on the planet, with some of the greatest technology to deploy if the elites really wanted to catch the guy, and all he had to do was One Wrong Move to be tracked down; so that was a solid correct prediction on my part. I don’t follow Russian politics super closely but even was surprised at Putin’s deception, where only a short time before Wagner had challenged Putin’s power - the lesson was “if you’re going to strike at the king, you better not miss.” Wagner went at it half assed and paid the price. And for the Trump assassination attempt, I was very certain at first that it was real - between the dead Trumpenproles and the timing, which was right before the RNC and right before Trump had picked his VP, if it had killed him it would have resulted in maximum Republican chaos - but given the total lack of investigation or real punishment for the Secret Service (which was definitely in on the attempt), given how quickly Trump’s ear wound “healed”, given Trump almost never talks about it, etc., I am much less certain now than I was then that things were on the up and up and the whole thing could have been faked to juice Trump’s campaign (although he was in the lead already against Kamala) and to make him appear as a kind of quasi-messianic figure to his supporters (such as the famous Trump raising his fist with the American flag in the background as he was covered in a smear of blood).

But all three of these events were pretty easily explainable on their face. The Trump event was either faked or instigated by the FBI/CIA to take him out, the Mangione attack was pretty clear with a basic explanation, and the Putin/Prigozhin stuff was pretty easily explainable as a power play too.

Here, there is not a clearcut explanation for Kirk’s assassination, and that is what makes it deeply unsettling. He was an effective organizer but otherwise very milquetoast, a gentile Zionist culture warrior gatekeeping version of Ben Shapiro, so it’s hard to think what the motive would be to assassinate him. He didn’t have much security (six guys, no metal detector checkpoint for the crowd, open air outside) because he didn’t think he needed any - and why would he, really? (Even though he ultimately did need it). His physiognomy covered by Prosopa Insights placed him well within the range of mainstream discourse and for clarity, I did not follow Kirk even slightly, although I did watch maybe ten or twenty minutes of his 2024 election night special. This was not a box on my “political bingo” card, although I predicted that political assassinations would increase as neoliberal feudalism sets into place and desperation increases. I mostly feel bad for Kirk’s two young children. Fathers are irreplaceable.

Sure, maybe the shooter will be found and the explanation will become more clear - and hey, at least it’s not a question of whether Kirk’s death was faked or not, the guy’s dead (and the shot was brutal). At the time of this writing two guys were arrested and then released when they weren’t the shooter; there are a couple of videos of a dot movement on a roof a couple hundred yards out which was likely the shooter, and some audio reports that the guy was covered in black and wearing a mask. He took one shot and then immediately ran. I don’t know how many video cameras were in the area or what tools the FBI can use to figure out who the shooter was, if they even want to find him - after the Butler attack the FBI scrubbed the attacker’s living quarters and the crime scene, and basically no other information has been released about him. This may be a black hole where the killer simply gets away with it and people move on to the next shiny Current Thing very quickly.

Here are some possible explanations for the murder:

1. Deranged pro-tranny shitlib culture warrior taking out anti-tranny "conservative" culture warrior - but shot was 200 yards away, could a deranged tranny culture warrior pull off the shot? Apparently it wasn’t a hard shot to make, especially while prone, having time to set up, etc - the fact that he likely aimed for the head but hit the side of the neck instead shows that he wasn’t an expert per an elite sniper analysis.

2. Kirk was an effective Republican organizer and this was a "deep state" attack to hurt Republican chances in 2026 and 2028. This is reminiscent of my deep state factionalism post between the elites and the counter-elites, even though I argued that both sides are controlled by the central bank owners.

3. Kirk was secretly going off the Zionist bandwagon secretly and slowly and he was nipped in the bud by Mossad. Although Kirk apparently kept his views close to the chest, he certainly had a handler (a requirement of being elevated into the mainstream spotlight - see Kanye’s handler, a Jewish Tavistock educated “personal trainer”, who threatened to take his kids away from him) and his full electronic activities would have been closely tracked. He was in his young 30s and his views were still evolving - the fact that he hired Blake Neff, the fired Tucker Carlson writer for wrongthink, showed that Kirk had some deeper views than the lame culture warrior stuff he expressed publicly.

4. Kirk was moderate and encouraged reaching across the aisle and the upper elites consistently prefers division and has their media promote it at every turn; this removes an element of moderation from the discourse. This would be important if the elites want to push the U.S. into some sort of civil disturbance or greater (see also the Ukrainian woman killed reminiscent of the Tim McLean murder, if she was real anyway - see here for how easy it is for AI to generate these images/videos and this Note along with this one). Shitlibs adopted a tone after the murder - it took them a number of hours to sync their stories, like a school of fish - where they pretended to care a little bit that he was murdered, but mostly mocked him for being against gun control when he was killed by a gun (see? THE IRONY, ha! …libs can’t meme at all, because they are fundamentally anti-humanity and anti-life, embracing centralization, lack of freedom, destruction and death.)

The disturbing thing about all of this is the possible motivations for the attack are quite disparate. One thing I am certain of is that the upper elites are using a supercharged version of LLMs to plan their strategies longterm, and it isn’t always clear how a particular action will be used in this plan on a granular level - they are using strategies to keep the public off-kilter. This attack may ultimately retain a giant question mark on it, even though it hurts Republican organization, it eliminates a potential future dissident in the making, and it increases the temperature of the public discourse. It seems like regardless of who was behind this particular attack, the upper elites will benefit.

Thanks for reading.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5772166&forum_id=2E#49253457)