\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
Self-absorbed tantric depressive
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
geriatric pearl business firm
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
magical ladyboy
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
geriatric pearl business firm
  12/06/25
...
Thriller cumskin
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
razzle-dazzle lay gunner
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
Self-absorbed tantric depressive
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
razzle-dazzle lay gunner
  12/06/25
...
Slate soul-stirring candlestick maker
  12/06/25
...
Slate soul-stirring candlestick maker
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
Alcoholic shrine codepig
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
magical ladyboy
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
geriatric pearl business firm
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
Fear-inspiring den sandwich
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
razzle-dazzle lay gunner
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
Fear-inspiring den sandwich
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
razzle-dazzle lay gunner
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
Fear-inspiring den sandwich
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
racy turquoise library
  12/06/25
wacky
harsh garrison fortuitous meteor
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
geriatric pearl business firm
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
odious resort blood rage
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
citrine location old irish cottage
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
razzle-dazzle lay gunner
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
Self-absorbed tantric depressive
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
pale misunderstood stead laser beams
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
razzmatazz pearly institution filthpig
  12/06/25
...
Self-absorbed tantric depressive
  12/06/25
"nigger"
chest-beating ebony roommate
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: Self-absorbed tantric depressive

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: geriatric pearl business firm

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: magical ladyboy

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: geriatric pearl business firm

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: Thriller cumskin



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle lay gunner

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: Self-absorbed tantric depressive

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle lay gunner

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: Slate soul-stirring candlestick maker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Slate soul-stirring candlestick maker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: Alcoholic shrine codepig

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: magical ladyboy

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: geriatric pearl business firm

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: Fear-inspiring den sandwich

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle lay gunner

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: Fear-inspiring den sandwich

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle lay gunner

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: Fear-inspiring den sandwich

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: racy turquoise library

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: harsh garrison fortuitous meteor

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: geriatric pearl business firm

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: odious resort blood rage

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: citrine location old irish cottage

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle lay gunner

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: Self-absorbed tantric depressive

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: pale misunderstood stead laser beams

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: razzmatazz pearly institution filthpig

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: Self-absorbed tantric depressive



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: chest-beating ebony roommate

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2E#49491178)