Kagan wrote the opinion tossing Mexico's mass tort liability suit against US gun manufacturers.

Jackson wrote the opinion tossing the Sixth Circuit's imposition of special burdens on members of majority groups suing for discrimination.

Sotomayor wrote the opinion striking down WI's singling out of just the Catholic Charities for ineligibility under WI's religious exemption for its unemployment compensation program.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2E#48991338)

In the era of TRUMP you think they'd have that covered by the fact that the administration is losing like 90% of its cases and is vocally MAF at them for it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2E#48991414)

That reverse-discrimination standard has always been weird af -- its actual motivation, I think, was just old-school old-white-man-federal-judge skepticism toward plaintiffs (and maybe discrimination plaintiffs in particular) and a desire to throw up some barriers to their cases, but it ended up coincidentally aligning with LJL 2010s-era progressive racial-hierarchy thought in the vein of "racism is an abuse of power, so blacks can't ever be said to be 'racist' against whites" -- and I could actually see Jackson et al. legit disagreeing with it as strongly / on the same basis as the cons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2E#48992548)