\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

If ocean is more nutrient-rich than land then why we live on land?

how did that come to pass?
Shimmering odious idiot dilemma
  07/21/25
These pretzels are making me thirsty
low-t adventurous organic girlfriend
  07/21/25
Despite the ocean being more nutrient-rich than land in term...
Overrated Lake Sweet Tailpipe
  07/21/25
that beg the question of why human is on the land in the fir...
Shimmering odious idiot dilemma
  07/21/25
but if we hadn’t moved onto land in the first place th...
orchid floppy mexican pervert
  07/21/25
correct, we would be under the ocean, point?
Orange big locale legal warrant
  07/21/25
glug glug.
orchid floppy mexican pervert
  07/21/25
The ocean's harsh conditions, including saltwater, pressure ...
spectacular degenerate boistinker
  07/21/25
समुद्र की कठोर परिस्थि...
Overrated Lake Sweet Tailpipe
  07/21/25
probably more viable than colonizing mars
provocative jewess
  07/21/25
woudlnt earth land -> mars be just as viable as earth sea...
Shimmering odious idiot dilemma
  07/21/25
...
Shimmering odious idiot dilemma
  07/21/25
the ocean is too salty for us
Frum onyx area
  07/21/25
that is exactly why we live on land, less competition to sta...
Orange big locale legal warrant
  07/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:04 PM
Author: Shimmering odious idiot dilemma

how did that come to pass?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119974)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:04 PM
Author: low-t adventurous organic girlfriend

These pretzels are making me thirsty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119977)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:05 PM
Author: Overrated Lake Sweet Tailpipe

Despite the ocean being more nutrient-rich than land in terms of dissolved minerals and biological productivity in certain zones, humans live on land primarily because it provides a more suitable and stable environment for our survival and development. Our biology is adapted to breathe air, walk on solid ground, and regulate body temperature in terrestrial conditions. While oceans contain vast amounts of nutrients that support massive populations of marine life, they do not offer the physical infrastructure we need—such as dry, stable surfaces for building homes, growing crops, and developing technology.

Additionally, human civilization has been shaped by access to fresh water, predictable weather, and fertile soil—all of which are more readily available and manageable on land. The ocean's harsh conditions, including saltwater, pressure changes, limited oxygen, and constant movement, make it a challenging habitat for long-term human habitation. Although underwater exploration and technology have advanced significantly, living permanently in the ocean would require complex life-support systems and enormous energy inputs. Therefore, even with the ocean’s nutrient richness, the practical needs of human life are far better met on land.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119978)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:06 PM
Author: Shimmering odious idiot dilemma

that beg the question of why human is on the land in the first place

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119979)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 9:02 PM
Author: orchid floppy mexican pervert

but if we hadn’t moved onto land in the first place then we wouldn’t be here to ask this question.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120094)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 9:04 PM
Author: Orange big locale legal warrant

correct, we would be under the ocean, point?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120099)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 9:13 PM
Author: orchid floppy mexican pervert

glug glug.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120130)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:07 PM
Author: spectacular degenerate boistinker

The ocean's harsh conditions, including saltwater, pressure changes, limited oxygen, and constant movement, make it a challenging habitat for long-term human habitation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119981)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:08 PM
Author: Overrated Lake Sweet Tailpipe

समुद्र की कठोर परिस्थितियां, जिनमें खारा पानी, दबाव में परिवर्तन, सीमित ऑक्सीजन और निरंतर हलचल शामिल हैं, इसे दीर्घकालिक मानव निवास के लिए एक चुनौतीपूर्ण आवास बनाती हैं।

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119984)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:08 PM
Author: provocative jewess

probably more viable than colonizing mars

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49119983)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 9:15 PM
Author: Shimmering odious idiot dilemma

woudlnt earth land -> mars be just as viable as earth sea -> earth land? so it would be + to colonizing mars idiota

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120137)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:47 PM
Author: Shimmering odious idiot dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120055)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:53 PM
Author: Frum onyx area

the ocean is too salty for us

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120071)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 8:55 PM
Author: Orange big locale legal warrant

that is exactly why we live on land, less competition to start with and once you get ahead you can dominate, ljl at ruling the seas

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753115&forum_id=2E#49120076)