Its gonna be 180 to rug them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817614)

its just common sense. i know you haven't spent time in the US but have you seen how much of every little thing is made in China? Even trump hats are made there. Its def not the $500B they claim

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817627)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817630)

As of 2024, China’s exports to the United States, valued at approximately $436–$460 billion USD, account for about 2.4–2.8% of its GDP, estimated at $18.42 trillion USD, with 2.5% as a likely midpoint based on data from the Observatory of Economic Complexity, World Bank, and China’s National Bureau of Statistics. This percentage reflects a decline from historical highs (e.g., exports were 36% of GDP in 2006), with the U.S. share dropping as China diversifies markets, a trend supported by 2023 figures showing $501.22 billion in U.S. exports against a $17.79 trillion GDP (2.82%). Despite a late-2024 export surge—$48.8 billion to the U.S. in December alone—driven by anticipated tariffs, the overall reliance on U.S. trade remains modest, though exact 2025 figures hinge on evolving policies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817704)

even china was dependent on intl supply chains but birdshits think in their brillance they can just make each country rely only on itsself which will be laughable esp for US military as it cant make most wepaosn without china rare earths

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817876)

birdshit amerikkka is retarded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817626)

https://archive.is/cQFAw

Those to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations bloc soared 18.9% to a record high, suggesting Chinese exporters may be routing U.S.-bound products through third countries to avoid tariffs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817622)

The average monthly salary in Thailand is around 20,000 to 25,000 Thai Baht (THB), or roughly $570 to $710 USD, although this can vary significantly based on factors like location, industry, and job experience.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817631)

* * *

The US is the world's largest consumer market, with almost $16 trillion in personal consumption expenditures.

Economic Impact: Consumer spending typically accounts for around 70% of US GDP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817645)

u are retarded if u dont udnerstand this, and there's tons of other jew scam BS in the "consumer spending"

thailand is furking 60m ppl u retard of course its not comparable but the US by itself is shit, the rest of the world unitied is way more powerful which is what trump is gonna end up doing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817695)

all this stuff is based on retarded braindead logic, the US wants to have USD as global reserve currency, well u hvae to run a trade deficit so others have dollars u dumb faggots

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817615)

wtf do u fags want? u can never have a perfect economy and the US has tons of retarded lazy niggas and birdshits so wtf do u expect, its a jew economy but its not that bad all things considered

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817633)

the overheated asset values here are as fraud as your net worth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817637)

and if u want to destroy everything then go ahead cause u idiots arent smart enough to do this properly even if it was possible which i dont think it is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817641)

i'm sure Joe Sixpack can learn how to work on the line at the iphone factory if he can build a commercial airplane

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817651)

including Lesotho BBC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817634)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817700)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817892)

First, the tariffs are driving a resurgence in American manufacturing and job creation. By making imported goods more expensive, Trump’s policies incentivize companies—both domestic and foreign—to invest in U.S.-based production to avoid the levies. Early evidence suggests this is working: the threat of tariffs alone reportedly secured significant foreign investment into U.S. manufacturing even before their full implementation. This aligns with Trump’s vision of reshoring industries that have been outsourced over decades, particularly since the 1990s with agreements like NAFTA and China’s entry into the WTO. Manufacturing jobs, which fell from 17 million in 1994 to 12 million by 2016, could see a meaningful rebound, boosting employment in the heartland and reducing reliance on foreign supply chains—a vulnerability exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Second, the tariffs generate substantial revenue for the federal government, providing a fiscal cushion to offset Trump’s proposed tax cuts and fund domestic priorities. During his first term, tariffs brought in $80 billion over four years, and the broader scope of the 2025 tariffs—potentially a 10-20% universal rate and up to 60% on Chinese goods—could raise hundreds of billions annually. The Tax Foundation estimates a 10% universal tariff could generate $2 trillion over a decade, while a 20% rate could yield $3.3 trillion. This revenue stream could reduce the federal deficit, finance infrastructure, or subsidize sectors like childcare, all while avoiding politically toxic income tax hikes. Trump’s historical admiration for the tariff-driven prosperity of the late 19th century underscores his belief that this approach can restore economic sovereignty.

Third, the tariffs serve as a powerful geopolitical tool, leveraging America’s massive consumer market to extract concessions from trading partners. Trump has tied tariffs to non-trade issues like drug trafficking and immigration, pressuring Mexico and Canada with 25% levies to crack down on fentanyl and border security. In his first term, similar threats compelled Mexico to deploy troops to its borders, proving the strategy’s efficacy. Globally, the tariffs could force nations to rethink unfair practices—like China’s subsidies or Europe’s high tariffs on U.S. goods—leveling the playing field. Trump’s claim that “access to the American market is a privilege, not a right” resonates as a bold reassertion of U.S. leverage, potentially deterring adversaries and fostering a more reciprocal trade environment.

Critics argue that tariffs raise consumer prices, citing estimates like the Peterson Institute’s $1,700 annual hit per household or the Tax Foundation’s $1,253-$2,045 range for 2025. However, this overlooks the long-term benefits: higher domestic production could stabilize prices over time by reducing dependence on volatile global markets, and companies may absorb some costs to remain competitive. Moreover, the inflationary impact may be overstated—Trump’s first-term tariffs didn’t significantly spike inflation, and a stronger dollar (a likely byproduct) could offset price increases. The real brilliance lies in trading short-term pain for enduring gains in industrial capacity and economic resilience.

Finally, the tariffs address national security concerns head-on. By targeting countries like China, which dominates critical supply chains (e.g., semiconductors, rare earths), Trump’s policies aim to rebuild America’s industrial base, reducing vulnerabilities to foreign disruptions or coercion. The declaration of an “economic emergency” under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act reflects a strategic recognition that persistent trade deficits—$653 billion in 2020—threaten not just the economy but the nation’s ability to defend itself. A revitalized steel industry, for instance, which saw investment surge after 2018 tariffs, exemplifies how this approach strengthens both jobs and defense readiness.

In sum, Trump’s tariffs are a bold gamble that could greatly improve America by sparking a manufacturing renaissance, generating revenue, enhancing geopolitical leverage, and fortifying national security. If executed with precision—pairing tariffs with incentives for domestic investment—they could herald a new era of American economic dominance, proving that “tariff” isn’t just Trump’s favorite word, but his most brilliant idea yet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48817908)

If you're pissed off at the US, the next three alternatives are China $19.5T, Japan $5T, and Germany $5T, all of whom are export giants who hate imports to their countries.

So you are essentially going to export to whom now that you are pissed off at Trump?

Whom do you think you are kidding?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48818162)

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

$30T a.k.a. market size for imports.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48818199)

Odd case 🤨🤔

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5705689&forum_id=2E#48818275)