\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

pop quiz: when was heliocentrism proven? Guess the century if not the year

...
Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse
  11/09/25
What is "never" for 3 hundred alex,?
avocado corner
  11/09/25
They say it was proven although I never looked too deeply in...
Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse
  11/09/25
proposed by copernicus in the mid-1500s in...fuck if I know....
coral skinny woman
  11/09/25
Technically heliocentrism isn't "proven" even for ...
Chartreuse bawdyhouse
  11/09/25
not derived from axioms but every admissible observation fit...
coral skinny woman
  11/09/25
various wikis claim stellar parallax for proof, not buying i...
Cracking den main people
  11/09/25
Phases of Venus is a better one
coral skinny woman
  11/09/25
yeah that's the one I was skeptical of
Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse
  11/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:22 PM
Author: Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415384)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:24 PM
Author: avocado corner

What is "never" for 3 hundred alex,?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415391)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:25 PM
Author: Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse

They say it was proven although I never looked too deeply into it. Right now I don't know how I'd prove it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415394)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:34 PM
Author: coral skinny woman

proposed by copernicus in the mid-1500s in...fuck if I know..Prussia maybe?

proven--never

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415417)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:34 PM
Author: Chartreuse bawdyhouse

Technically heliocentrism isn't "proven" even for the limited purposes of our own solar system, it's just that assuming it makes calculating orbits easier.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415418)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:40 PM
Author: coral skinny woman

not derived from axioms but every admissible observation fits the model and no rival model beats it. it isn't just a convenient coordinate trick though--not just easier math. the observable data itself produces measurable effects that dont still hold by picking diff coordinates

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415423)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:40 PM
Author: Cracking den main people

various wikis claim stellar parallax for proof, not buying it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415424)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:45 PM
Author: coral skinny woman

Phases of Venus is a better one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415434)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 9th, 2025 9:46 PM
Author: Slippery Translucent Meetinghouse

yeah that's the one I was skeptical of

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795432&forum_id=2E#49415439)