The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell
| Marvelous french chef shrine | 05/22/25 |
| Marvelous french chef shrine | 05/22/25 |
| Marvelous french chef shrine | 12/08/25 |
| Sepia cocky ratface affirmative action | 12/09/25 |
| kink-friendly wrinkle | 12/09/25 |
| Marvelous french chef shrine | 12/09/25 |
| ruby abusive church incel | 12/09/25 |
| ruby abusive church incel | 12/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM Author: Marvelous french chef shrine big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"
https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089 |
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM Author: Marvelous french chef shrine [taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]
is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust. |
|
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: Marvelous french chef shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2E#49495612) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM Author: Sepia cocky ratface affirmative action Next up, 13th Amendment! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2E#49495893) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM Author: kink-friendly wrinkle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2E#49496020) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: Marvelous french chef shrine Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316 |
 |
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM Author: ruby abusive church incel the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2E#49496287) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM Author: ruby abusive church incel also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.
the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether). |