\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Obvious takeaway from the injunction case is Sup Court should get off its ass

"Oh no - what should we do during the 3 years from the ...
Multi-colored School Cafeteria
  06/28/25
you do understand that in the absence of a trial of some sor...
Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman
  06/28/25
What facts do you need to establish to determine if an EO is...
Multi-colored School Cafeteria
  06/28/25
a great many policies may be unconstitutional "as appli...
Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman
  06/28/25
The law should create a mechanism where facts or evidence ca...
nofapping vigorous mexican library
  06/28/25
that would just be a trial by another name
Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman
  06/28/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:02 PM
Author: Multi-colored School Cafeteria

"Oh no - what should we do during the 3 years from the point where the president passes a questionable law to where we weigh in on it! We don't really know, but the district court shouldn't be issuing a universal injunction!"

I dunno - maybe if we're trying to figure out if 10 million people are actually citizens of this country you could just weigh in on it immediately rather than make them go through 2 prolonged scrimmage trials?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057239)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:06 PM
Author: Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman

you do understand that in the absence of a trial of some sort you cannot establish facts, which are necessary for a determination, the issue with injunctions is that they are done on a preliminary basis without bothering to do the part where you figure out wtf is true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057242)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:10 PM
Author: Multi-colored School Cafeteria

What facts do you need to establish to determine if an EO is constitutional or not?

Not being sarcastic I just don't get how it applies to student loan forgiveness or birthright citizenship.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057246)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:15 PM
Author: Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman

a great many policies may be unconstitutional "as applied" and that certainly requires a factual finding, the very high level stuff does require less but you still can't just assume everything the plaintiff says is true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057261)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:11 PM
Author: nofapping vigorous mexican library

The law should create a mechanism where facts or evidence can be established short of a trial at a hearing or something.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057250)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:13 PM
Author: Bat shit crazy razzle-dazzle coldplay fan skinny woman

that would just be a trial by another name

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744250&forum_id=2E#49057254)