AI has FAR SURPASSED human intelligence at this point
| metaepistemology is trans | 11/21/25 | | bungulator | 11/21/25 | | potluck | 11/21/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/21/25 | | thankman | 11/21/25 | | whimsy the cat | 11/21/25 | | gay porn faggottt | 11/21/25 | | LathamTouchedMe | 11/21/25 | | SneakersSO | 11/22/25 | | jock itch | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 | | gay porn faggottt | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 | | gay porn faggottt | 11/22/25 | | moshe | 11/22/25 | | PROJECT DONK | 11/22/25 | | gay porn faggottt | 11/22/25 | | potluck | 11/22/25 | | cucumbers | 11/22/25 | | WordcelWorth | 11/22/25 | | cucumbers | 11/22/25 | | gay porn faggottt | 11/22/25 | | WordcelWorth | 11/22/25 | | Paralegal Jahangir | 11/22/25 | | Buck Broken | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 | | lsd | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 | | SneakersSO | 11/22/25 | | ""''"'"'"'"'' | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 | | yooper | 11/22/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 11/22/25 | | metaepistemology is trans | 11/22/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 22nd, 2025 11:27 AM Author: gay porn faggottt (gunneratttt)
i didn't "import" iq, it's in your op.
cognitive testing like iq is great at quantifying things that can be boiled down to correct and incorrect answers. pattern recognition, recalling facts, etc. in that way computers have surpassed human intelligence long ago. AI is not much different than an encyclopedia or calculator. those things can already do mathematics or store and recall information far beyond what any human could possibly ever do. but you wouldn't call either intelligent.
intelligence that evades quantification are things like innovation and decision making. while AI is great at accurately applying things like game theory, it has trouble creating an independent framework to make decisions. because what AI is doing is referencing and applying existing human knowledge.
saying AI has "far surpassed" human intelligence is silly because it is not *actually* intelligent. it is great at *applying* things humans have already created, or mimicking them. that's not intelligence, that's rote memorization and application. it's the same reason there's not a 1:1 ratio between cognitive testing and outcomes in cognitively demanding fields.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800655&forum_id=2Reputation#49451693) |
Date: November 22nd, 2025 8:23 AM Author: cucumbers
i have debated this point countless times here. here's the summary:
1. OP almost certainly has a liberal arts degree and usually fails to admit this or stops responding.
2. OP lacks an understanding of the limits of computing and the history of AI and its precursors or related fields.
3. assuming OP hasn't disappeared after my accusation of them being a Liberal Artist, i point out a large flaw in their argument that they have no response to. libs?
source: i have a STEM degree from a "prestigious" STEM school and was the principal software engineer at a large AI company before the AI bubble.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5800655&forum_id=2Reputation#49451482) |
|
|