Dems should offer Ghislaine Maxwell a pardon to spill the beans on Trump
| yapping cuckoldry | 07/12/25 | | Soul-stirring Whorehouse Sandwich | 07/12/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/12/25 | | Histrionic sapphire office | 07/12/25 | | Cerebral naked business firm | 07/12/25 | | Soul-stirring Whorehouse Sandwich | 07/12/25 | | Histrionic sapphire office | 07/12/25 | | tantric library | 07/14/25 | | Apoplectic umber heaven | 07/14/25 | | Swashbuckling Nowag Step-uncle's House | 07/12/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/14/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/14/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/14/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/14/25 | | tantric library | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/14/25 | | tantric library | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/14/25 | | tantric library | 07/14/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/14/25 | | bateful stead | 07/22/25 | | spectacular spot | 07/22/25 | | yapping cuckoldry | 07/22/25 | | pungent dragon | 07/22/25 | | bateful stead | 07/23/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 14th, 2025 8:19 AM Author: bateful stead
The Appellate Court judge overseeing the Ghislaine case is going to vacate her conviction as the evidence has 'gone missing'. This case is over, both varieties of age of consent feminists, left & right, have been defeated by Trump.
There's no reason for her to make a government deal when she can walk away with no jail & no civil liability due to missing discovery/evidence documents.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749636&forum_id=2Reputation#49099757) |
 |
Date: July 14th, 2025 8:45 AM Author: tantric library
1) link to evidence the jury relied on "disappearing." idk how that could even happen if we're talking about paper records. it would be in the record and in the possession of multiple attorneys and le agencies. they all lost their copies?
2) no, an appellate court would not vacate a conviction unless there is some argument the missing evidence was unreliable and even then its a stretch. vacating convictions are very rare.
3) it would take multiple judges. the fact you dont know that the federal appellate court sits on panels (and that her conviction has already been unsuccessfully appellated) makes me think you don't know wtf you're talk about.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749636&forum_id=2Reputation#49099784) |
|
|