*gets called out for believing retarded crank shit*
| Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | flushed jewess piazza | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Carmine Range | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Carmine Range | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Lime stirring gaming laptop | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Lime stirring gaming laptop | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Milky Windowlicker | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | Electric Trump Supporter | 08/14/26 | | Demanding macaca | 08/14/26 | | At-the-ready pink athletic conference | 08/14/26 | | Razzmatazz cordovan bawdyhouse digit ratio | 08/14/26 | | Copper indirect expression | 08/14/26 | | Khaki Splenetic Mother | 08/14/26 | | Copper indirect expression | 08/14/26 | | Rose cocky lay hunting ground | 08/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Lime stirring gaming laptop
you’re ridiculous, and you argue poorly.
the notion that “simulation theory” and “just asking questions” about whether life is a computer program is somehow more intellectually respectable than examining anomalies in the moon-landing evidence is absurd.
do you also take the government’s grainy photo propaganda of interstellar UAPs stalking Navy jets at face value? you probably think that's totally real too.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2Reputation#50068058) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Khaki Splenetic Mother
No. You are conflating very different kinds of claims into one bucket labeled “questioning official reality". Simulation hypothesis is speculative metaphysics/philosophy of computation. It doesn't require accusing any particular group of scientists, engineers, or institutions of coordinated fraud. It asks whether our observed physics and consciousness are consistent with being inside a computational process run by some more advanced system. You can take the argument seriously without assigning it a high probability or treating it as settled.
Moon landing hoax claims are different. They require a large scale, multi-decade conspiracy involving NASA, contractors, physical samples, other countries who had every incentive to expose NASA. The claimed “anomalies” have been repeatedly examined and explained by ordinary engineering and physics.
Navy UAP videos are in a third category. It is entirely legitimate to analyze the sensor data to analyze whether the objects (or apparent objects) in the video are genuinely physical objects or anomalous. What isn't legitimate is making the leap to say that since the videos are anomalous that they must be part of some government conspiracy to cover up alien craft. That puts it into the same bucket as moon landing hoax crankery.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2Reputation#50068107) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: Electric Trump Supporter
I guess it depends on what you consider fringe. There is a lot of stuff that is "fringe," but not necessarily baseless. e.g.) being opposed to the Civil Rights Act.
Many people will not say anything about that even if they agree with the arguments.
But again, I am not sure what you are really referring to.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2Reputation#50068035) |
|
|