I can only think of one good historical analogy for the US war vs Iran
| charcoal shitlib | 08/09/26 | | Soul-stirring Sick Gaping Halford | 08/09/26 | | charcoal shitlib | 08/09/26 | | Soul-stirring Sick Gaping Halford | 08/09/26 | | charcoal shitlib | 08/09/26 | | Soul-stirring Sick Gaping Halford | 08/09/26 | | charcoal shitlib | 08/09/26 | | Soul-stirring Sick Gaping Halford | 08/09/26 | | charcoal shitlib | 08/09/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 9th, 2026 12:53 AM Author: charcoal shitlib
and it's not a great one, because the weaker side was on the defense in this conflict, but it would have to be Babur's war against Ibrahim Lodi, culminating in the first battle of Panipat.
In this case, Babur's men were like Iran: they had weapons their opponents had never seen before. Totally new technology. Gunpowder. Ibrahim Lodi's men were primarily armed with wooden sticks and trained for CQC, so the battle consisted of Babur's men using pistols and cannons gun down of all of Ibrahim Lodi's men, who had no idea what was even happening.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890879&forum_id=2Reputation#50054613) |
|
|