instead of Large Hadron Collider we should have build Large Lithium Burner
 
  | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK  |   10/28/25 |  | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK  |   10/28/25 |  
 
  
	  
	 Poast new message in this thread
	 
 
 
  
	  
	  
 
 
               	 
	  
	  Date:  October 28th, 2025 6:54 PM
 Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK 
  this lithium does all kinds of shit. At one point they were liquifying it, then spraying it into a fine mist to use as fuel in rocket engines. I think it was Rocketdyne who did this, maybe in the 1950s. It's been mystery tech since then though. Off limits they say. 
  (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790978&forum_id=2Reputation#49383037) |  
  
  
	  
	  
 
 
 
               	 
	  
	  Date:  October 28th, 2025 6:58 PM
 Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK 
  "In the 1960s, Rocketdyne test-fired an engine using a mixture of liquid lithium, gaseous hydrogen, and liquid fluorine to produce a specific impulse of 542 seconds, likely the highest measured such value for a chemical rocket motor.[2] Despite the high specific impulse, the technical difficulties of the combination and the hazardous nature of the propellants precluded further development.[3]"
 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripropellant_rocket
  
  That's what I mean. They just decided it was "too dangerous" 60-70 years ago, and we never bothered to look at all the kooky shit you can do with molten lithium
  (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5790978&forum_id=2Reputation#49383052)  |  
  
	 
  | 
	 
	  |