The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Bort olds is this what the Clinton sex scandal was like?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 12th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: godawful passionate office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49423464) |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:17 PM Author: opaque digit ratio It was a combination of non-stop hilarious late night fodder that this Boomer was pounding teen cunnus, and a lot of sanctimonious outrage in DC because he was corrupting the morals of a generation. But the man basically was the early Trump, deny deny deny then get away with it by sheer charisma. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49423521) |
 |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:30 PM Author: godawful passionate office I guess one difference is Clinton’s approval was in the 60s/70s when all that was going on while Trump’s is in the 30s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49423563) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:21 PM Author: Juan Eighty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49443971) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: stfu jewbag how come he never got 50% of the popular vote then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49444055) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:00 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) Are you saying the approval ratings were just made up? What's your actual point?
Almost like there was an third party candidate who got a fair number of votes in both of his elections |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:23 PM Author: stfu jewbag almost like 50% of voters voted against Bill Clinton. Why does it matter if it’s for ghwb or some nerd billionaire fag? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445176) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:35 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) again, what is your actual point? do you think the approval ratings were made up? does having <50% of the popular vote change the fact that he was objectively a popular president by the end of his term? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445192) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:39 PM Author: stfu jewbag if he was so popular than more people should have voted for him. votes matter more than "approval ratings".
not sure wtf your point with the Perot comment is other than that Clinton, being as unpopular as he was, would probably not have won in 1992 if not for him. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:40 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) you are fucking retarded and should go back to twitter where you came from
"if he's so popular why didnt more people vote for him" "because his popularity increased over time" "but then why didnt they vote for him" |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:43 PM Author: stfu jewbag it's a simple question. why did half of the US electorate vote against Bill Clinton if he's as "popular" as you say he was and so many people "approved" of him? he couldn't even crack 50% running against Bob fucking Dole. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445206) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) repeating the same question over and over instead of addressing actual arguments is for twitterfags. go back to your circlejerk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445211) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:50 PM Author: stfu jewbag responding in unison with the other shareblue cumfarters with the "achtually it's different bc Perot" npc line is what twitterfags do. maybe you should just answer why that's at all relevant?
I'm probably the only person here who doesn't have a twitter account. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:55 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) "shareblue said it so that must mean it's wrong!" is the epitome of retarded thinking. that doesn't make it any less the actual reason why he did not, in fact, get above 50% of the popular vote. that is actually the singular reason why he didn't get above 50% of the popular vote
and it does nothing to take away your entire line of argument being braindead partisan retard bullshit. you are just looking for anything to point at to distract from clinton very obviously being a popular president by the end of his term. "but then why didn't more people vote for him!" is a red herring |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:58 PM Author: stfu jewbag the singular reason is that more than half the voters did not want to vote for him. Sorry this fact upsets you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445231) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:02 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) Sorry that Clinton is the most popular living President! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445237) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:06 PM Author: stfu jewbag since you think irrelevant metrics are important. Trump has the lowest usga handicap of any president ever. That is more relevant imo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445246) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:15 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) Also sorry nobody fell for what you were pretty obviously trying to set up:
"But Trump never got above 50% either!" "That's because the count was fraudulent" |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:03 AM Author: stfu jewbag you are very stupid. ask shareblue for more better material (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445895) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:35 AM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) lol the most retarded posters always trot out the "thareblue!" when they can't actually think of anything to say
you may want to update your script btw, I don't think there's a "shareblue" anymore |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:03 PM Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; Please state your awareness of Ross Perot’s campaigns for POTUS in 92 and 96 before I engage you further. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49444068) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:22 PM Author: stfu jewbag How does that change the fact that 50%+ of the voters voted against Bill Clinton. If he was so popular then you would think they would vote for him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445171) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:15 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. because he ran against legit 3rd party candidate both times who got a double digit percentage of the vote. Trump never had to run against a Perot, and still never won a majority of the vote (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49444093) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:20 PM Author: stfu jewbag that doesn’t change the fact that >50% of the voters voted against Clinton (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445169) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:05 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn Ross Perot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445244) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:27 AM Author: stfu jewbag if bill clinton was so popular then why did people vote for ross perot instead of him? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445938) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: gay porn faggottt (gunneratttt) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49443937) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: ;::;:;;::;;;;;:::: the late night jokes were 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49443940) |
|
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:18 PM Author: Tripping friendly grandma new version i remember when the starr report came out, i looked through it for the most salacious bits. searched pdf for cigar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49423525) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:04 AM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49443505) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:11 PM Author: ;::;:;;::;;;;;:::: no, other than the move on freaks, the democrats didn't try and make excuses for Clinton's sleaziness and openly acknowledged he was an inveterate pussy hound. They in fact leaned into his scumbag nature. I still remember listening to Rush, broadcasting live from the impeachment proceedings. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:18 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) I still remember seeing this as a kid https://i.etsystatic.com/26238862/r/il/e28720/7041226981/il_794xN.7041226981_o62c.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49443961) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:06 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn Always forget that move on was named after the Clinton impeachment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445245) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: fulano what was awful about this period was how relentless this was. non stop media stories about this, every newspaper, broadcast, magazine. no XO! something like 85% of america reported major fatigue on this shit but it was salacious enough to keep selling. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: stfu jewbag lol he was literally getting blown by 21 year old interns in the oval office and jamming cigars up their twats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445212) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:41 AM Author: Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon ( ) it was a 180 carnival (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445643) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn What was amazing about this period is that it was the 90s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445247) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:51 PM Author: Nazca Redlines It felt like it received more sustained coverage and was a treated as a bigger deal and bigger scandal. That's in large part because there was still a lot of faith and pride in the office of the presidency, so a scandalous affair in the oval office was particularly saliacious and disorienting. Could this even be real? How could he? Now, society is divided, people no longer respect our institutions, and a sex trafficking scandal involving at lest two presidents is not only unsurprising, it's expected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49444046) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:42 AM Author: Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon ( ) Remember Bush Jr and Gore both running on "restoring dignity to the White House"?
hahahahaha. that really worked out well |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:36 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, if you need to, read the definitive account:
https://www.amazon.com/Death-American-Virtue-Clinton-Starr/dp/0307409457
Starr was a decent man but when the details of the Arkansas land deals got confusing Starr kept expanding the inquiry into all sorts of nonsense. yes, Bill committed perjury and yes Bill sexually assaulted women in ways that Trump never did, but the utter lack of judgment by Starr and his team lead to the death of the Special Prosecutor. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:38 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, also, Bill lied under oath. no one doubts that. ask yourself what would happen if Trump lied under oath that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445198) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:43 AM Author: Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon ( ) Trump never lies. Ever (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445645) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 8:59 AM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Trump lies constantly of course. but he lies like a high pressure salesman. which he is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445883) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn Toobin’s book is great too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445248) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:03 PM Author: ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,..., It was actually much worse than anything Trump did but the media insisted it was no big deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445240) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:05 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn lol, not even close. Half the country has no idea who Epstein even is or what people are talking about.
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:43 AM Author: Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon ( ) Best part: Ken Starr was Epstein's lawyer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445646) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:25 AM Author: OldHLSDude Clinton was much more light hearted and entertaining. There we had a President who not only sounded like an Arkansas goober, but who also had a taste for slutty trailer park pussy - Paula Jones was the best. Getting a blowjob from a jewish intern who kept her cum stained blue dress as a souvenir on the advice of her scheming friend was 180. His shrew wife just increased the melodrama. I believe he reportedly said to Monica after jizzing, "I haven't had that in a long time." Every guy in America secretly identified with Bill and wished him well. He managed to keep it going for 18 months. Then he lied about it, saying, "I did not have sex with that woman," which led to accusations that kids were giving and getting more blow jobs because it wasn't "sex." He even got his law license suspended. How can you not love a telenovela like that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445936) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:34 AM Author: Sue Johanson Talkin' Sex Yeah I was young and didn't realize how much it resonated with all the still relatively young/middle age boomer guys in sexless marriages at the time. Slick Willy was 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2id.#49445957) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:38 AM Author: Charles Tyrwhitt Dad What I remember of Clinton was that a sizable number of people, a minority but still sizable, did not like him because they saw in him the epitome of the charismatic two faced high school senior who'd cleverly make everyone look the other way while he got up to no good behind the gym, or if found with his pants down, would charmingly convince people it was actually a good thing and evade punishment (strikingly similar to Gavin Newsom in a sense). That's why he was called Slick Willy. The Republican base in those days were goody two shoes conformists who resented Clinton because he clearly had the fun with his life they never did. That was the origin of the intensity of their hatred for him and it bounced back badly on them when they tried to prosecute him.
Clinton's antics would have had him me-tooed badly 20 years later, but even in the 1990s it still made deep hypocrites out of the feminists of the era. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:41 AM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Nina Burleigh, who covered the Clinton White House for Time and who once said of President Clinton, “I’d be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”
===
Gloria Steinem would not mount the same vigorous defence of Bill Clinton today that she offered in a controversial 1998 article that downplayed accusations of harassment against the then president, the feminist icon has told the Guardian.
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/22/opinion/feminists-and-the-clinton-question.html
|