SCOTUS Stays Hawaii Judge's Order Trying To Stop Trump Trannie Passport Ban
| vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen | 11/06/25 | | vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen | 11/06/25 | | Up-to-no-good Deranged Fanboi | 11/06/25 | | vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen | 11/06/25 | | Up-to-no-good Deranged Fanboi | 11/06/25 | | Trip Lay | 11/06/25 | | Big Orchid Mental Disorder | 11/07/25 | | apoplectic foreskin | 11/06/25 | | vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen | 11/06/25 | | apoplectic foreskin | 11/06/25 | | fragrant cruise ship | 11/06/25 | | Trip Lay | 11/06/25 | | apoplectic foreskin | 11/06/25 | | fragrant cruise ship | 11/06/25 | | fragrant cruise ship | 11/06/25 | | vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen | 11/06/25 | | Up-to-no-good Deranged Fanboi | 11/06/25 | | Arousing cuck | 11/06/25 | | slippery hall place of business | 11/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:04 PM Author: vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen
JUSTICE JACKSON, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and
JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from the grant of application for stay.
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2id.#49407938) |
 |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: vigorous digit ratio liquid oxygen
dissent p. 9:
But how urgent can
this interest be when the Passport Policy itself allows
transgender Americans who already have passports with
sex markers reflecting their current gender identity to continue using those passports until they expire?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2id.#49407977) |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: fragrant cruise ship
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment.
Our task in deciding stay applications is not simply to
make a “back-of-the-napkin assessment of which party has
the better legal argument.” Noem v. Doe, 605 U. S. ___, ___
(2025) (JACKSON, J., dissenting from grant of stay) (slip op.,
at 3).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2id.#49407976) |
|
|