These people literally want all of us dead, defending indiscriminate mass killings of innocent people if a cop and/or a corporate executive is also killed, etc

There are others just like this on the other socialist/communist subs that I follow. These people are literally demons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49142759)

•

20h ago

To be fair, she was an executive. Not CEO. There are probably at least 5 or 10 executives. I agree it’s very strange. Maybe he was cajoled by someone into doing something he didn’t realize. Like an mkultra victim or something. But the woman who worked for Blackstone was not CEO, just to be clear

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49142762)

Basically if you're under 20 and poasting on reddit, I think you should be forced to go into the military or something. These people need perspective. They need to be plugged in in some way that connects us to each other.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49142775)

the self righteousness is a bad look on you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49142945)

Disgusting to see so many bootlicking neocons defending Adams and Cuomo here. We know they just do the bidding of Wall Street. Real change is possible you just have to vote for someone who's actually different.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143055)

Per this guy's manifesto, he was 100% trying to shoot up the NFL offices and had no intention to kill this woman specifically. She was there at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Even further, whatever she did in her career did not justify what happened to her in any way. Leftists who cheer this shit on are literally evil as fuck, zero morals, black-hearted, pieces of shit, etc.

Disgusting to cheer this on, disgusting to handwave away a literal mass shooting on "well she was a CEO and deserved it"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143134)

Perhaps take a look at the thread I linked to in the OP for some examples of these "people"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143208)

should I be justifying the death of innocent people and police because some no-named executive got murdered in the process, probably accidentally? Explain this thought process for us.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143225)

People cannot, and will not, tolerate this state of affairs forever. What cannot be settled peacefully will be settled violently. This is the way the world works. This has always been the way the world works. Aristocrats, plutocrats, whatever you want to call them, take and take and eventually the masses can endure no more and there is bloodshed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143258)

Whenever the masses start to get a clue they are distracted--occupy wall street gets shunted aside in favor of race-identity bullshit. White working class resentment gets funnelled into Trumpism, which has no intention of truly challenging the elites.

But it is coming. Sometimes these things start with the stupidest shit and, once they get rolling, wealthmos better man their private gates.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143285)

If there is an advantage to exploit, those who exploit it will persevere and those who don’t will be unsuccessful. This is true of both business and evolution. Intelligent people are capable of seeing this, and by weighing their possible choices even people who are aligned with your principles and even more extreme than you are incentivized to exploit the opportunity. Killing someone like her does nothing, because her role will just be filled by the next person.

The correct way to change this is through laws and social incentives. If your viewpoint is actually widespread and widely accepted, then getting these laws in place should be easy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145148)

you don't have a plan. you don't have a better alternative. you are just looking to justify evil actions because jealousy.

provide some specifics. provide some better alternatives.

hopefully, while you are providing a response, some loser you are advocating for breaks in and blows your brains out because he thinks you are one of the people 'exercising power for your own selfish ends' at his expense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145509)

Explain your celebration of dead police and innocent people OTHER than the CEO lady, please.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143219)

the whole “trains” meme that’s been in the backdrop of xo since 2015? Yeah that includes “CEOs” and their immediate lackeys

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145155)

It might be sad if an entrepreneur who founded a $100MM company got ganked. (Depending on certain variables.)

But some corporate bootlicker whose only achievement is being a better corporate bootlicker than most of the other corporate bootlickers? Rot in hell.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49143002)

most of these are grotesque kikes paid to post nonsense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49144104)

people act as if they are principled conscientious objectors and theyre only not a blackstone exec because of that. anyone that participates in gc, which is almost everyone, is culpable to some extent. we could all move to the wilderness like ted k but choose to enjoy a gc life instead.

being that she's a blackstone re exec i bet she profoundly sucked. but prejudging her to the point of celebrating her murder is gross. remember that these people would also celebrate the murder of most here who work umc white collar jobs serving gc.

at what level of gc employ does a persons murder shift from tragedy to laudable? why not the server in the blackstone cafeteria? why not everyone here who invests and profits in gc? everyone here is just as much of a knowing participant as she was.

this is the equivalent of watching combat footage and hooting at the carnage. ironically done by non-revolunaries from their gc screens enjoying gc luxuries. if a bangladeshi murdered your family because you wore nikes knowing they were produced by cruel slave labor, would you celebrate that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49144750)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49144822)

I think we can just assess these on a case by case basis going forward and be fine tbh.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145152)

I work in a building full of lawyers - I guaranty that if some gunman came and shot up this office, the idiots on r/theprogram and r/dsa etc etc would literally celebrate my and others death, mock it with "Thots and prayers" type of jokes, etc., maybe even a few "they deserve the wall too" type jokes (the commie redditors love to say that). And i suppose now, certain posters on xo would also celebrate it.

No one even knew this woman's name or even the united HC CEO before these murders, now they are celebrated on r/theprogram by a bunch of loser redditors (and I guess, some xo posters too)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145329)

Conversely I think people would be sad if somebody killed, random example, Eminem. People would say he was a good dude who came from nothing and entertained us all with his funky raps. And he's probably a lot richer than those other two.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145350)

EDIT: Conversely, why couldnt people make the same argument about Eminem? Technology has allowed a handful of artists to dominate music, whereas there used to be a wide and vibrant community of local musicians. Artists like Eminem forced them out of the market and into new lines of work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145360)

Em and other big artists didn't have anything to do with the decline of the varied music industry. It was the decline of people purchasing albums due to file sharing. The middle class musician used to stay afloat from album sales which all but evaporated. Nothing to do with mainstream cash cows who have always existed in every era. The comp would be if someone murdered Daniel Ek and I guarantee if that happened for some reason the internet would have a field day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145405)

these people don't make the rules, they play by them and excel.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145525)

the sentiment appearing on reddit is expected since its normie midwits making 40k who think blackrock has 5-10 execs. here on xo it's pure cope. im envisioning some lawyer drafting a blackrock transaction coming here to larp as a revolutionary. the peasants with pitchforks see no difference a lawfirm paypig and this woman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145469)

"The economy ought to work for regular people!" - lady who lives in a $7 million apartment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145474)

Similarly I don't think people hate a lot of the successful people in this country just because they're successful, but a healthcare CEO operates on a business model of charging working class people an arm and a leg for a service they can barely use and if anything serious ever happens they're at the mercy of some account executive who makes life or death decisions about real people based on bean counting and not humanitarian reasons.

QED

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145337)

my point is that we're all willing participants and enjoy the benefits of our system. it would be like me condemning a nutcher for slaughtering animals while im eating a burger.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145429)

you're not engaging with what im arguing. i know i can be hard to parse sometimes so if my poasts lack clarity i suggest using the transformative power of an llm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145505)

### Analysis of the Exchange

The conversation focuses on public reactions to the murder of a BlackRock Real Estate CEO, debating the morality of celebrating it in the context of global capitalism (GC). **Gunner (t3h P0aStEr oF d00m!!!!!!!!)** argues against celebrating the murder, while **HAtp (i gave of counsel head)** defends the public’s sentiment. The query asks if HAtp misunderstands Gunner’s argument, to draft an explanation clarifying Gunner’s point, and to analyze the clarity of Gunner’s argument and reasons for HAtp’s misunderstanding.

#### Does HAtp Misunderstand Gunner’s Argument?

Yes, HAtp struggles to grasp Gunner’s point that celebrating the CEO’s murder is hypocritical since most people, including forum participants, are complicit in GC. HAtp focuses on justifying anger against elites (11:46 AM, 12:39 PM), citing Trump and Bannon, and claims personal detachment from GC (1:35 PM), missing Gunner’s argument about shared complicity. Gunner notes this at 12:20 PM (“this doesn’t address the argument”) and 12:49 PM (“you’re not engaging”).

#### Explanation for HAtp

**To HAtp**: Gunner isn’t defending the CEO or rejecting populism—he supports it. He’s saying it’s hypocritical to cheer her death when we’re all part of GC, using tech, jobs, or investments tied to the same system. If her role makes her death “deserved,” why not us, or a BlackRock janitor? It’s like bashing a butcher while eating a steak. HTH.

#### Clarity of Gunner’s Argument

**Clarity**: Gunner’s argument is clear: celebrating the CEO’s murder is hypocritical since everyone benefits from GC, and the line for “deserving” death is arbitrary. His 12:20 PM analogy (butcher and burger) and 1:20 PM post are concise, but the 3:59 AM post is long, covering Ted Kaczynski and hypotheticals, which may obscure the point. Casual terms like “profoundly sucked” fit the discussion but could distract.

#### Reasons for HAtp’s Misunderstanding

1. **Populist Focus**: HAtp fixates on elite abuses (11:46 AM), misreading Gunner’s argument as defending the CEO, despite Gunner’s support for populism (1:20 PM).

2. **Defensiveness**: HAtp’s claim of living on $15,000 (1:35 PM) shows resistance to being implicated in GC, clouding their understanding.

3. **Deflection**: HAtp uses sarcasm (e.g., Bannon references, 1:03 PM) to avoid engaging with Gunner’s point.

4. **Abstract vs. Concrete**: Gunner’s systemic complicity argument is abstract, while HAtp prefers concrete grievances (e.g., price gouging).

5. **Pace**: The fast discussion favors quick retorts, and HAtp’s short posts suggest skimming Gunner’s denser arguments.

#### Conclusion

HAtp misunderstands Gunner’s argument about hypocrisy in celebrating the CEO’s murder, focusing on populist anger instead. Gunner’s point is clear but lengthy and abstract, which may challenge HAtp. HAtp’s misunderstanding stems from their populist lens, defensiveness, deflections, preference for concrete issues, and the discussion’s pace. The explanation clarifies Gunner’s point directly for HAtp.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145787)

"Gunner isn’t defending the CEO or rejecting populism—he supports it. He’s saying it’s hypocritical to cheer her death when we’re all part of GC, using tech, jobs, or investments tied to the same system. If her role makes her death “deserved,” why not us, or a BlackRock janitor? It’s like bashing a butcher while eating a steak. HTH."

i think you use threads like this to write about whatever you're interested in the time, this time being rage against gc, and dont try actually try to engage with who you're responding to. say many of your responses itt are just a springboard to a non-sequitur that is only tangentially related to what you're respond to.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145942)

plug it in yourself then. all i did was copy and paste and ask it to analyze. it even has the prompt i asked it at the beginning. it doesn't know that i'm gunner.

ai is a great tool for analysis, it's not trained to tell you what you "want". it doesn't know who "you" are or what "you" want unless you train it to.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49146248)

it's just so funny to me this conscientious put-on sympathy on a board where people regularly celebrate the deaths of ordinary people all over the world. those deaths are celebrated by elites just like this women who 1) don't give a single flying fuck about any of those people being killed, 2) actively use their pulpit to support evil actors or sit idly when only they realistically control the levers of power in the world at this point, and 3) almost certainly say AND DO far worse shit than some fucking unemployed and frustrated redditors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145593)

"i don't think people are condemning a "system," they are condemning specific evil actors and industries"

oh damn you mean the system? who doesn't use healthcare or finance itt? how do you know this woman was evil beyond her title in a company that you patronize or industry equivalent?

i'm comparing them as a rhetorical device to have people itt celebrating her death to consider their own culpability and how it's materially different beyond position in the gc hierarchy. it's a midwit take interpret that as literally equating a blackstone cafeteria worker with her.

you express sympathy for re: deaths of Palestinians all the damn time on this bort, and many people here love seeing muzzbros blow up. how is that different from what i'm doing.

also, i called her death "necessary" and said she "probably sucked" by virtue of her position. but that's different than "deserved." sometimes changes require breaking a few eggs, but she's merely a participant in a deeply flawed system same as you and me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145635)

The irony is that I generally agree with a lot of their skepticism around the corporatization of everyday life, but they are so self-righteous, their understanding is so bad, and they get so many of their facts wrong that they become liabilities.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145198)

this has happened many times before. if public opinion expressed through words isnt heeded people will begin to take direct action. but this woman just did at a senior level what millions knowingly facilitate and would gleefully fill her now vacant spot in the gc hierarchy. hopefully big changes come before they start killing the lawcucks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145570)

"If only they KNEW how having no economic or social future was AKSHUALLY benefitting them! They're so young and inexperienced, they don't even get how the gerontocracy is the best of all possible worlds! One day they will be wealthy lawcucks and finally understand the majesty of are fair system."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49145642)

Bottom line you need to understand is... All commie libs are going to die.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756301&forum_id=2most#49151794)