\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

SCOTUS FUCKS OVER PRISONER--REVERSES GRANT OF HABEAS TODAY

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-680.pdf Und...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
scotus is a TTT in decline
Flickering hairraiser kitchen scourge upon the earth
  02/21/12
...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
...
Heady Kitty Cat
  10/09/15
there was NO precedent on point. lol @ thinking Mathis decid...
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
What about Ginsburg's disagreement with the other portion of...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
she's just a girl bro, her vote doesn't count on scotus anyw...
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
have some respect, bro. seriously--she is a very intelligent...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
you think so? actually both the majority and dissent on this...
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
u think law clerks write these opinions?
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
idk bro. you'd think the justices would at least give their ...
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
so what would've been better? I need advice, I'm clerking th...
Soul-stirring Startling Institution
  02/22/12
What's up with that Kagan vote, brothers?
razzle-dazzle useless brakes doctorate
  02/21/12
obama
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
srsly brahs, obama's justice dept intervened on the state's ...
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
Was too busy scissoring with the wise latina to read the bri...
Unholy Den Police Squad
  02/21/12
this opinion needs some THURGOOD
razzle-dazzle useless brakes doctorate
  02/21/12
LOL at the SCOTUS. Yeah, you don't need to give prisoners w...
laughsome dog poop
  02/21/12
*lists factors favoring party A*
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
yeah bro, someone in prison is, by definition, free as a bir...
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
What's up Scalia?
laughsome dog poop
  02/21/12
hey man, just noshin on a calzone, watching some college bba...
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
Actually, almost the same.
laughsome dog poop
  02/21/12
DESCRIBE the games you're watching also, RATE this youtub...
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
Michigan at Northwestern. I rate that youtube vid a ZERO.
laughsome dog poop
  02/21/12
wtf thats some quality shit. how much do u have wagered o...
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
...
Heady Kitty Cat
  10/21/15
I think after being arrested and imprisoned once already you...
jet background story
  02/21/12
*lists factors favoring party B*
ebony sickened pervert principal's office
  02/21/12
HAHAHHAHA HOLY SHIT
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
they vary in levels of retardation, and to be fair that's......
Soul-stirring Startling Institution
  02/22/12
Sutton, shitlib
Heady Kitty Cat
  10/09/15
THE GREAT WRIT DEMANDS THIS MAN'S FREEDOM (slim shady douche)
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
Chances SSM would fellate this guy if he were freed?
Unholy Den Police Squad
  02/21/12
i'm thinking the petitioner in this case is a lib. thoughts?
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
Are not all members of NAMBLA?
Unholy Den Police Squad
  02/21/12
obv. btw breh, please RATE this youtube -- http://www....
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
can someone give me the black letter law from this?
appetizing codepig
  02/21/12
(racist espn writer)
Cerise Regret
  02/21/12
The initial step in determining whether a person is in Miran...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/21/12
(slim shady douche)
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
i still don't understand your schtick brother maybe i jus...
Cerise Regret
  02/21/12
he's dumb too.
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
...
Heady Kitty Cat
  02/22/12
being questioned while a prisoner is NOT a violation of clea...
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  02/21/12
...
Exhilarant brethren
  11/27/13
...
Lascivious ultramarine trump supporter striped hyena
  11/27/13
1800000000000000000000
Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
  10/09/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 10:55 AM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-680.pdf

Under AEDPA, a federal court may grant a state prisoner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus if the statecourt adjudication pursuant to which the prisoner is held “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.” 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(1).

In this case, it is abundantly clear that our precedentsdo not clearly establish the categorical rule on which the Court of Appeals relied, i.e., that the questioning of a prisoner is always custodial when the prisoner is removed from the general prison population and questioned about events that occurred outside the prison. On the contrary, we have repeatedly declined to adopt any categorical rule with respect to whether the questioning of a prison inmateis custodial.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20016444)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:28 PM
Author: Flickering hairraiser kitchen scourge upon the earth

scotus is a TTT in decline

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019752)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:26 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019738)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 9th, 2015 8:33 AM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#28932009)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:30 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

there was NO precedent on point. lol @ thinking Mathis decided that prison interrogations always need to be mirandized

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019763)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:31 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

What about Ginsburg's disagreement with the other portion of the ruling:

But I disagree with the Court’s further determination that Fields was not in custody under Miranda. Were the case here on direct review, I would vote to hold that Miranda precludes the State’s introduction of Fields’sconfession as evidence against him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019771)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:41 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

she's just a girl bro, her vote doesn't count on scotus anyway

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019817)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:43 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

have some respect, bro. seriously--she is a very intelligent Justice and she wrote her concurring and dissenting in part opinion very cogently.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019823)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:48 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

you think so? actually both the majority and dissent on this point read like B+ law school exams.

*lists factors favoring party A*

inserts ON THE OTHER HAND

*lists factors favoring party B*

THEREFORE, B WINS

********************

JUSTICE HOOLAHOOP, DISSENTING.

*lists factors favoring party B*

inserts ON THE OTHER HAND

*lists factors favoring party A*

THEREFORE, A WINS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019853)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:48 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

u think law clerks write these opinions?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019864)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:51 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

idk bro. you'd think the justices would at least give their clerks the basic outline and points/arguments they want to make

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019886)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2012 12:18 AM
Author: Soul-stirring Startling Institution

so what would've been better? I need advice, I'm clerking this autumn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20021884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:30 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle useless brakes doctorate

What's up with that Kagan vote, brothers?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019767)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:42 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

obama

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019820)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:55 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

srsly brahs, obama's justice dept intervened on the state's behalf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019917)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:44 PM
Author: Unholy Den Police Squad

Was too busy scissoring with the wise latina to read the briefs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019832)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 8:52 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle useless brakes doctorate

this opinion needs some THURGOOD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019895)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:10 PM
Author: laughsome dog poop

LOL at the SCOTUS. Yeah, you don't need to give prisoners who are taken to an interogation room in the middle of the night without consent by armed policeman for questioning Miranda rights. No coercion to worry about there bros.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019988)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:14 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

*lists factors favoring party A*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020006)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:26 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

yeah bro, someone in prison is, by definition, free as a bird.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020077)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:30 PM
Author: laughsome dog poop

What's up Scalia?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020114)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:34 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

hey man, just noshin on a calzone, watching some college bball. and u?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020166)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:38 PM
Author: laughsome dog poop

Actually, almost the same.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020215)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:39 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

DESCRIBE the games you're watching

also, RATE this youtube --

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=P40TP1ughek#t=14s

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020220)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:42 PM
Author: laughsome dog poop

Michigan at Northwestern. I rate that youtube vid a ZERO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020247)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:44 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

wtf thats some quality shit.

how much do u have wagered on mi/nw?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020258)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2015 4:18 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#29015673)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:12 PM
Author: jet background story

I think after being arrested and imprisoned once already you should know the drill.

People disagree with that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20019995)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:14 PM
Author: ebony sickened pervert principal's office

*lists factors favoring party B*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020008)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:29 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
Subject: HAHAHHAHA HOLY SHIT

Nor does the statement in Maryland v. Shatzer, 559 U. S. ___, ___, that “[n]o onequestions that [inmate] Shatzer was in custody for Miranda purposes” support a per se rule. It means only that the issue of custody was not contested in that case.

seriously, how fucking retarded is the sixth circuit?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020102)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2012 12:19 AM
Author: Soul-stirring Startling Institution

they vary in levels of retardation, and to be fair that's... yeah, pretty much the only way to read that sentence. which 6th cir judge wrote this shit, I wonder

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20021886)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 9th, 2015 9:08 AM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

Sutton, shitlib

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#28932125)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:34 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker
Subject: THE GREAT WRIT DEMANDS THIS MAN'S FREEDOM (slim shady douche)

While serving a sentence in a Michigan jail, RandallFields was escorted by a corrections officer to a conference room where two sheriff’s deputies questioned him aboutallegations that, before he came to prison, he had engaged in sexual conduct with a 12-year-old boy. In order to get tothe conference room, Fields had to go down one floor and



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020156)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:35 PM
Author: Unholy Den Police Squad

Chances SSM would fellate this guy if he were freed?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020178)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:36 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

i'm thinking the petitioner in this case is a lib. thoughts?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020188)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:37 PM
Author: Unholy Den Police Squad

Are not all members of NAMBLA?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020195)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:39 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

obv.

btw breh, please RATE this youtube --

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=P40TP1ughek#t=14s

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020221)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:44 PM
Author: appetizing codepig

can someone give me the black letter law from this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020263)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:48 PM
Author: Cerise Regret

(racist espn writer)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020307)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:50 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat

The initial step in determining whether a person is in Miranda custody is to ascertain, given “all of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation,” how a suspect would have gauged his freedom of movement. Stansbury v. California, 511 U. S. 318, 322, 325. However, not all restraints on freedom of movement amount to Miranda custody. See, e.g., Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U. S. 420, 423. Shatzer, distinguishing between restraints on freedom of movement and Miranda custody, held that a break in Miranda custody between a suspect’s invocation of the right to counsel and the initiation of subsequent questioning may occur while a suspect is serving an uninterrupted term of imprisonment. If a break in custody can occur,it must follow that imprisonment alone is not enough to create a custodial situation within the meaning of Miranda. At least three stronggrounds support this conclusion: Questioning a person who is alreadyin prison does not generally involve the shock that very often accompanies arrest; a prisoner is unlikely to be lured into speaking by alonging for prompt release; and a prisoner knows that his questioners probably lack authority to affect the duration of his sentence. Thus, service of a prison term, without more, is not enough to constitute Miranda custody.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020321)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:51 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

(slim shady douche)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020329)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:51 PM
Author: Cerise Regret

i still don't understand your schtick brother

maybe i just haven't taken the time, but i'm defaulting to the opinion that you're mentally ill

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020338)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:52 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

he's dumb too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020341)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2012 12:50 PM
Author: Heady Kitty Cat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20025110)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2012 9:49 PM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

being questioned while a prisoner is NOT a violation of clearly established federal law (with respect to the SPS made up bullshit miranda rule)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#20020320)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 27th, 2013 12:11 AM
Author: Exhilarant brethren



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#24519324)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 27th, 2013 12:14 AM
Author: Lascivious ultramarine trump supporter striped hyena



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#24519340)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 9th, 2015 9:02 AM
Author: Crimson Corn Cake Windowlicker

1800000000000000000000

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1879658&forum_id=2#28932081)