The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
IMPORTANT REMINDER: Obama wins '12; Hillary wins '16.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:19 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
And maybe '20, although that's admittedly pretty far afield at this point to be making predictions.
Even if we just limit this to the next 8 years, between them they will get to replace Ginsburg and probably at least two of Scalia/Thomas/Kennedy, fundamentally swinging the ideological makeup of the court far to the left for decades to come. Between all of these probable outcomes and the near certainty that our population will continue to get more and more brown (read: liberal), Republicans looking more and more permafucked on the national stage. |
 |
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:23 PM Author: Trip snowy shitlib home Hilary will be one of those old white hags who lives forever like Margaret Thatcher. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996571) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:24 PM Author: Talented university puppy I didn't realize you were a shitlib. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996573) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:26 PM Author: Marvelous sinister senate people who are hurt Making predictions based on available evidence and reality does not make one a shitlib. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996586) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:33 PM Author: bonkers goyim tbf, reality does have a liberal bias. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996642) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:25 AM Author: insecure mental disorder pit Wrong on so many levels (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760913) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:28 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Yeah bro because I sound happy as fuck predicting all of this. You tarded. |
|
Date: November 7th, 2012 11:28 PM Author: pearl school sex offender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#21997729) |
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:37 PM Author: Appetizing newt I don't think Hillary will have the energy to make a run in '16. She seems chill as fuck now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996660) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:40 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
It's all part of her plan bro. She is clearly narcisstic as fuck, cares a lot about her "historical legacy", and would probably find the chance to vindicate her '08 pummeling and actually go down as the first female POTUS in American history irresistable as 50% of the American population goes apeshit and starts chanting her name, demanding that she throw her hat in the ring.
And what is there left to troll against her with? She's a YLS grad who spent 8 years in the WH as FLOTUS to a popular president seeing how things work there, and then she spent the last decade and a half developing her own political credentials (Senator from a major state + well-regarded SoS). She is intelligent, educated, articulate, and experienced. Assuming she can manage to keep her current semi-chill/cool persona going (gravitas can work very well for women as they age), she will literally be unstoppable. And by '16 Bill will either still be alive and charming as shit (big nostalgia points), or he will be dead and earn her major sympathy points. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:42 PM Author: Talented university puppy "gravitas can work very well for women as they age"
women don't have gravitas at any age brah |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:43 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Margaret Thatcher would politely but firmly instruct you to shut the fuck up, dumb pumo. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:44 PM Author: Talented university puppy yeah, hillary = thatcher (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996714) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:46 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
I'm pretty sure your claim above was that "women" never develop gravitas.
I'm pretty sure I just gave you a perfect modern rebuttal example.
I'm pretty sure now you're inartfully trying to move the goalposts since you got intellectually assfucked for making a demonstrably dumb statement.
I'm pretty sure you should leave this thread now.
Thanks. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:46 PM Author: Talented university puppy i dont care about what happens in other countries
hillary needs to be doing something becoming for her age and gender, like knitting sweaters. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:48 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Enjoy posting comments like this on CNN news articles as she governs from a WH near you starting in early 2017, brah. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:52 PM Author: Talented university puppy bro she ain't even winning the nomination, she's old news (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996755) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:17 PM Author: comical honey-headed field LOL. she'll clear the Dem. field if she puts her name in for 2016. maybe cuomo would have the ego to run as well, but there's no way he beats her. none. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996894) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:20 PM Author: Talented university puppy fags are a big fucking deal in Democratic politics, and Cuomo brings them.
and unlike Hillary, he's actually from New York. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:22 PM Author: comical honey-headed field no one outside of New York cares about who is or isn't from New York. since when has the NY primary mattered jack shit in dem. primary politics?
i can't believe you're making an argument that a governor from NY who has done nothing else in life except for one policy outcome could beat 8 years FLOTUS + senator + secretary of state. jesus. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:26 PM Author: bonkers goyim the gays love Hillary, dummy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996953) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:59 PM Author: Vivacious ruddy forum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996787) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:45 PM Author: Appetizing newt I think without Bill pushing her hard she doesn't care for it. Either way I predicted on here over a year ago that GOP was fucked and would not win until at least 2020 due to demographic shifts in the US, and that's only with a radical shift in the makeup of the party (shitboomer whites need to die off in GOP and make way for a more pragmatic younger party leadership). Can't find the thread though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996719) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:27 AM Author: insecure mental disorder pit Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760914) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:41 PM Author: Trip snowy shitlib home She's gonna take a couple years off to recharge then come back hard as fuck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996682) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:39 PM Author: Green trust fund Republicans: let's nominate a flip-flopping rich guy from Massachusetts. Worked for the Democrats. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996672) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:48 PM Author: Marvelous sinister senate people who are hurt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996736) |
|
Date: December 28th, 2016 2:09 AM Author: Domesticated sticky library pozpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#32246034) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:43 PM Author: Talented university puppy Andrew Cuomo and Martin O'Malley disagree (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996702) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:44 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
LOL tyvmft |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:58 PM Author: bonkers goyim it's a good thing you're a pumo, bro. There is absolutely zero chance that anyone else could summon the star power to defeat Hillary. To do it last time, it took Hillary's support of the least popular thing imaginable (the Iraq War) and running against one of the most charismatic politicians in America who also had the best political organization in history. Now she's more removed from that decision and it is no longer a big deal since the war is over. And neither of these guys is nearly as charismatic as Obama. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996782) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:03 PM Author: Talented university puppy I'm a reptile, but objectively, don't discount Cuomo. Dood was responsible for gay marriage in New York. That's a big fucking deal to libtards. he's also been an executive, something that Hillary lacks. as a reptile, I'm more afraid of Cuomo than Hillary. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996801) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:04 PM Author: bonkers goyim so what you are saying is that he guarantees New York in the Democratic column. Great! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996809) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:14 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Yeah he provides the one thing that Hillary sorely lacks - New York connections. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 5:24 PM Author: Amber Awkward Potus To be fairer,
Right, because it was those pesky connections to Albany that kept her from securing enough votes back in 2008. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:57 PM Author: Chartreuse razzle corn cake menage I mean, this is a kind of worthless stat, but the last time a president was succeeded by a president of the same party but who did not serve as his vice president was Hoover, basically because Coolidge blackballed Dawes. So, it's not really that frequent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996778) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 2:58 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
"this is kind of a worthless stat"
Agreed. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:00 PM Author: Chartreuse razzle corn cake menage Don't you think a Biden-Clinton primary gets awfully messy? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996788) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:03 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Given that literally no one in American pays attention to Biden (except when he puts his foot in his mouth) or takes him seriously or even particularly likes, no. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:05 PM Author: Trip snowy shitlib home No. It'll be interesting when Cory Booker tries to get the nom and sets up another "young energetic black politician vs old hag white lady" matchup. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996816) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:06 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
This is literally the only potential fly in the ointment that I can see. Assuming that he can keep his nose clean, does anyone really doubt that Cory Booker will be POTUS someday? |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:11 PM Author: Trip snowy shitlib home He needs a bigger stage than Newark first. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996850) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:15 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
I don't necessarily disagree, but reminder: Obama was still in his first term as Senator before becoming POTUS, and his only previous political experience before that was State Senate. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:15 PM Author: bonkers goyim lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996876) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:16 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Cory Booker: Brilliant, articulate, charismatic, tall, well-built, alpha-yet-non-threatening black guy with an impeccable educational background and a growing list of leadership experience.
You: Post on XO. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:19 PM Author: supple pisswyrm has the murder crisis in newark actually been solved yet under his leadership? seems like it's still ongoing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996905) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:20 PM Author: bonkers goyim tbf,
your reply is analogous to what dipshit did above. booker's relative superiority to me is not important. his lack of appeal to the democratic base is. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:21 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Bro you have been too consistently wrong ITT for me to give a shit what you think. PS: anyone who doesn't take Cory Booker seriously on the national stage is an idiot, straight up. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:26 PM Author: bonkers goyim ok bro, tell me in excruciating detail everything I've been wrong ITT on.
I took Booker seriously until about a month ago. He's damaged his brand with the people who matter in the Democratic party, I don't think he'll ever be POTUS now. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:28 PM Author: Elite lascivious jew To be fair,
Read the last paragraph you wrote.
That's all I have to say. You know who "matters" in the Democratic party? Democrat/Moderate voters. They will LOVE Booker, and because once the voting booth opens this is still a democracy, that's all that ultimately matters at the end of the day when it comes to getting elected. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:42 PM Author: bonkers goyim Tbf,
I accept your concession. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:06 PM Author: Talented university puppy youre assuming he's beaten Christie for Gov? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996823) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:08 PM Author: bonkers goyim Cory Booker has fucked himself with his retarded questioning of the Obama campaign. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996830) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:07 PM Author: supple pisswyrm it depends on whether or not the GOP can capture a higher percentage of the white vote. if whites swing hard to the GOP and the GOP becomes the de facto "white" party in america, it would remain competitive.
|
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:08 PM Author: Talented university puppy whites in the Midwest and parts of the Northeast need to start seeing the writing on the wall and vote more like whites in the south, then Reps will get it done. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996837) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:12 PM Author: supple pisswyrm the problem is that the GOP does not actually represent "white" interests, as such
it's not clear that voting GOP actually ends up being a better deal for whites than voting dem
if you look at other ethnic-based political parties around the world, they basically all try to offer something to their political clients, and even conservative parties have a socialist underbelly in that regard
if your "pitch" to white voters always revolves around tax cuts for people who are already successful, that's going to result in diminishing returns over time. you need more than that. you need to offer something more substantive, like higher wages in the unskilled sector of the blue collar workforce |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:19 PM Author: Talented university puppy you're not wrong. Republcan party has a problem in that it needs lots of big business money, but needs lots of working class votes. So they're squishy on stuff like immigration. stuff like english as an official language or affirmative action are better issues for them.
but more and more whites will vote GOP because the Dems are actively hostile to them, especially white men. Dems actively want more illegal aliens in the country and on voting rolls. They want whites prosecuted for voter intimidation but not blacks. so whites just move to the GOP without anywhere else to go. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:24 PM Author: anal bawdyhouse mediation reptiles can just keep pushing their tea tard/religious nonsense and hook dumb lower-class whites. That's worked well for 30 years now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996934) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:25 PM Author: Talented university puppy yeah, but it's repelling upper middle class whites for reasons I don't totally understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996941) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:34 PM Author: anal bawdyhouse mediation uhh, because upper class whites are smart and generally less religious? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20997000) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 5:29 PM Author: Amber Awkward Potus The fore is more true than the latter.
Especially in the South. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:25 PM Author: supple pisswyrm that has been happening so far. but the problem in the medium term with that strategy is that you leave a political "flank" open to blue-collar oriented white dems, like the ones in west virginia. especially at the local level and in statehouses as opposed to the congress.
and if you give up too much of your party's direction to narrow interest groups, you risk sudden and sharp backlashes when those interest groups implement policies that go wrong. iraq is a good example of that; it was pretty much the main reason the dems did so well in 2006 and 2008 and had that brief 60 seat majority.
and i really don't think you could look at something like iraq as a "good" policy for whites, or worthy of all the political attention it ended up demanding.
but yet, there are still powerful interest groups welcomed by the GOP who would like to repeat the exact same thing in iran.
if the GOP wants to become more of a white-interest party, it has to be smarter than that. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:28 PM Author: Talented university puppy I think of the GOP as more of the everyone but nigs, fags, and feminists party (maybe hispanics included now too)
Iraq was terrible. |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:31 PM Author: supple pisswyrm hispanics tend to be way more socialist-leaning in outlook than the mainline of the GOP. that's a tendency with deep religious and cultural roots. a lot of them seem completely repelled by something like a libertarian economic state with no government-provided social safety nets. like, viscerally repulsed, as though it would be immoral to consider. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996982) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:32 PM Author: Indigo mentally impaired house hispanics aren't really as socially conservative as people think though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996988) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:44 PM Author: supple pisswyrm mexico city made gay marriage legal a few years ago
they have some socially conservative tendencies, especially in areas like abortion, but it's based out of catholicism, which is one of the more "mutable" branches of christianity in terms of people's social attitudes |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:29 PM Author: vigorous lake volcanic crater dog poop i have been a MAF hillary hater for many years, but honestly her time as SoS has rehabilitated her image with me. she has stayed the fuck out of political bullshit and acted like a true technocrat. she's been much more competent than i would have anticipated. i never thought i'd say this, but i would consider voting for her for POTUS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996969) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:30 PM Author: Talented university puppy wow, we're fucked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996981) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:33 PM Author: supple pisswyrm lol hillary...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSu0zXCR9sE |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 4:32 PM Author: vigorous lake volcanic crater dog poop to be clear, i still harbor deep-seated concerns about her. i'm just saying it isn't impossible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20997326) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2012 9:50 AM Author: galvanic feces CR brother. Hated that bitch in 08 but she has done wonders for her image. Coincidence that we haven't heard WJC's name much in the same span? I think not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#21001773) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:34 PM Author: fragrant cocky address -......... ......... ...............- You're knowledge of NY politics is interesting. Are you thinking about taking the bar there again? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20996998) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:53 PM Author: razzmatazz state the very idea that hillary WON'T be the obvious 16 nom is such weird flame. does she have cancer or something i don't know about? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20997086) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 3:53 PM Author: Titillating Plaza cr she will win in '16 even if obama loses in '12 |
|
Date: July 1st, 2012 4:08 PM Author: Jet-lagged really tough guy dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#20997183) |
|
Date: December 28th, 2016 2:09 AM Author: Domesticated sticky library pozpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#32246031) |
|
Date: December 28th, 2016 2:32 AM Author: mind-boggling digit ratio look at the bullet we dodged (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#32246112) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2017 3:06 AM Author: mind-boggling digit ratio (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34546980) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2017 3:12 AM Author: Iridescent Halford ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34547005) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:15 AM Author: mind-boggling digit ratio (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760907) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:22 AM Author: Impressive medicated box office technically she did win, but the electoral college chose her opponent instead of the candidate the people chose (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760912) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:37 AM Author: floppy principal's office Good work in this poast (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760919) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2017 7:46 AM Author: insecure mental disorder pit Technically she did not win. California does select the president (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#34760933) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2021 12:46 PM Author: Startled black lay ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984028&forum_id=2#42301955) |