xo is wrong about shrews
| Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | grizzly disrespectful corn cake | 11/03/13 | | Godawful bisexual tanning salon therapy | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Godawful bisexual tanning salon therapy | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Godawful bisexual tanning salon therapy | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Splenetic beta juggernaut | 11/03/13 | | copper trip gas station party of the first part | 11/03/13 | | wonderful spot | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | naked double fault | 11/04/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | wonderful spot | 11/03/13 | | naked double fault | 11/04/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | underhanded filthpig | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | Floppy nibblets ratface | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | copper trip gas station party of the first part | 11/03/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | Garnet dilemma | 11/03/13 | | grizzly disrespectful corn cake | 11/03/13 | | startling sex offender pisswyrm | 11/03/13 | | autistic voyeur | 11/03/13 | | Spectacular Useless Elastic Band Parlour | 11/03/13 | | lime insecure sandwich | 11/03/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/03/13 | | fiercely-loyal zombie-like corner bbw | 11/03/13 | | fragrant toilet seat kitchen | 11/04/13 | | odious halford | 11/03/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/03/13 | | odious halford | 11/03/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/03/13 | | odious halford | 11/03/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/03/13 | | copper trip gas station party of the first part | 11/03/13 | | odious halford | 11/03/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/03/13 | | copper trip gas station party of the first part | 11/03/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/03/13 | | wonderful spot | 11/03/13 | | copper trip gas station party of the first part | 11/03/13 | | odious halford | 11/03/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | Splenetic beta juggernaut | 11/03/13 | | erotic alcoholic candlestick maker feces | 11/03/13 | | Contagious Home Mad Cow Disease | 11/04/13 | | Cracking personal credit line institution | 11/04/13 | | heady menage | 11/04/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/04/13 | | dashing sickened lay | 11/04/13 | | Electric Mahogany Stock Car Incel | 11/04/13 | | Beady-eyed university | 11/05/13 | | Vigorous low-t space | 11/05/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/04/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/04/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | bat-shit-crazy forum | 11/04/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | Hairless thriller house | 11/04/13 | | bat-shit-crazy forum | 11/04/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | erotic alcoholic candlestick maker feces | 11/04/13 | | Medicated dark tattoo stead | 11/04/13 | | bat-shit-crazy forum | 11/04/13 | | Medicated dark tattoo stead | 11/04/13 | | bat-shit-crazy forum | 11/04/13 | | boyish shrine internal respiration | 11/04/13 | | exciting yarmulke puppy | 11/04/13 | | aromatic background story | 11/12/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 3rd, 2013 10:08 PM Author: Garnet dilemma
Most of cock-hopping is thinking that a dood they're dating has "potential". Most women who rack up numbers do so when they're dating a guy for a month or more and they actually think something will come of it.
Women don't cock-hop like men do. Women just can have piss-poor instincts when it comes to who actually is a realistic marriage prospect.
I do know many 30+ women who have gotten married. Heck, I even know many middle-aged women who are on their second or third marriages to men of a similar age. An attractive woman stays attractive. A good catch does not depreciate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24364687) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2013 10:13 PM Author: Cracking personal credit line institution
Women who have "piss poor instincts" about who's marriage quality at THIRTY years old don't deserve to be getting married. What took them so long, when other women got it ten years earlier? The guys these women marry, if at all, are desperate or clueless. Not guys with options, certainly.
If he has a good stable job, he's not violent, he has a good family, he takes care of himself physically, he's not a drunk/druggie, he's a good marriage prospect. It's not hard.
You marry to have a family, so there's no reason to marry a woman over 35.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24364743) |
Date: November 3rd, 2013 9:55 PM Author: startling sex offender pisswyrm
Dude, there are shrews because there's a new phenomenon in the world, where people are less and less interested in marriage and children.
Japan is leading in this phenomenon, but we're headed there too.
See this: http://gu.com/p/3jtcn
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24364526) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2013 10:16 PM Author: Spectacular Useless Elastic Band Parlour
Nice to read an article that is thought provoking and interesting. Being the father of two mid twenties males living in London there are similar issues that they experience as reflected in the article.
From a 50 yr + perspective who has been though the job, house family pathway I find it interesting that some of the urban younger generations are turning away from the traditional pathway of accepted social norms and making choices about life and relationships based on differing experiential values.
Good luck to them perusing gratification that is not dictated to them ......
reply to boomer flame: handsofstone malcolmedwards
20 October 2013 3:28pm
Recommend
1090
It might also be something to do with the fact that your generation took all the houses and remain in all the jobs.
Having a family without those two isn't ideal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24364773) |
Date: November 3rd, 2013 11:02 PM Author: aromatic background story
Wrong about value of marrying shrews. Here's why.
1. There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON for a man to marry unless he wants a family. This is not debatable, and any low-t shitlibs betas who say otherwise should be ignored.
2. If you want a family, you need a wife who is going to be a good mother. After all, it makes no sense to marry someone who sucks at the one thing that merits getting married in the first place.
3. A good mother wants to have children at a reasonable age, both for the health of the children and so that she has the youthful energy to be a good mother. A woman who wants to push off having kids until her late 30s presents serious red flags for being a good mother (not to mention the cost and stress of fertility treatments).
4. A good, reasonably-aged mother also wants to RAISE her children, not shelp them off to a daycare to be half-heartedly monitored 10 hours a day in a group of 20 other toddlers by 4 Jamaican/Mexican ladies. While it is understandable why a shrew likes the daycare option, there is ZERO upside for a man in this scenario.
5. In addition to projecting to be a good mother in some abstract way (including sacrifice career for kids), you need a wife who actually WANTS to be a primary caregiver to her children. Otherwise, she'll just get bitter and jaded over time and take it out on you by witholding sex, etc. So, the only woman who is worth marrying is a woman who actually wants to raise children, and who you think can do a good job of it. Forcing a shrew into a non-shrew box is a plan that is doomed to fail.
6. Women who both want to be good mothers and actually project to be good mothers have always known that good mothers can't be 70-hour a week career chicks or ppl who travel the world for business, and have self-selected career fields that either have flexible hours, or good part time options, or are the sorts of jobs that one can move in and out of without too much trouble. Teachers, nurses, ocupational therapists, etc.
7. Shrews fail at every level. They are often ambivilant about kids, and, even when committed, generally inclined to put career in front of kids in the short-term. Even if you can convince shrews to have kids at a proper age, they are FAR more likely to want to stick their young kids in all-day daycare. Those shrews that actually bite the bullet and are willing to leave their high-powered careers generally due so for financial reasons, and tend to be bitter and insecure about the whole thing. They can't help but feel ashamed that they're raising children rather than "putting their degree to good use", and often take it out on their husbands. And when it's time to get back in the workforce after the kids are school-aged, those shrews that have bothered to alter their careers to raise kids often find it extremely difficult to pick up their careers, leading to additional bitterness and dissatisfaction.
So why bother with all this bullshit? Just so you can have spirited debate about fiscal policy over the dinner table? Fuck that. I'll have those conversations with the shrews at work (or, better yet, men), and enjoy my cheerful, motherly, preschool teacher wife at home. HTFH.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24365182) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2013 8:57 AM Author: heady menage
Scholarship
Ps OP is Julia
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24366767) |
Date: November 4th, 2013 12:41 AM Author: Hairless thriller house
ok i got pwned
but seriously though lots of women in cush jobs are just lazy shits.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24365856) |
Date: November 4th, 2013 6:37 PM Author: Medicated dark tattoo stead
as usual, xoxo likes to deal w/ the extremes of either a stay-at-home mom who devotes 100% of her time to raising kids or career-driven shrew gunning for partner working 60-70 hrs/week.
there are very few shrews IRL b/c being super into career over family works against female instincts. no woman considers herself successful w/o a family. but there is something in btwn a woman whose only ambition is to be a stay at home mom and the career shrew. every single one of my female friends end up in less strenous jobs once marriage and babies are on the horizon, but the girls never quit working completely if they live in high COL cities
the only couples i know where the woman has quit her job completely are ones where 1) the girl didn't bring in enough income to justify the cost of hiring a nanny/daycare 2) they live in a low/medium COL where the guy's income alone is enough to live comfortably.
there is no such thing as having it all. ideally, the woman can be a stay at home mom and raise the kids, but if you have a $700k mortgage and the woman makes $150k-200/year in a steady "mommy track" 9-5 job, it's a hard thing to give up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24370191) |
|
Date: November 4th, 2013 6:43 PM Author: Medicated dark tattoo stead
employers do not want to hire people who haven't been in the workforce for the last 5-7 years.
once you're out, you're basically committed to being out for good or settling for significantly less income once you re-enter the workforce.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2404541&forum_id=2#24370233)
|
|
|