\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Libs, help me understand how anti-AA is anti-minority

The purpose of AA is to further the educational benefits of ...
Lascivious reading party
  04/22/14
Bc AA like all other lib priorities, is premised on lib bull...
smoky address
  04/22/14
180
Motley tanning salon jap
  04/23/14
because the "diversity" rationale is bullshit that...
Maniacal khaki roast beef doctorate
  04/23/14
...
naked stead boltzmann
  04/23/14
...
Lascivious reading party
  04/22/14
libs also have dat critical | mass | argument
curious misanthropic range jewess
  04/24/14
...
ruddy useless brakes
  04/24/14


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:37 PM
Author: Lascivious reading party

The purpose of AA is to further the educational benefits of diversity. This benefit inures to EVERYONE, INCLUDING WHITE PEOPLE at a university. So when the majority votes to ban AA, they are doing so after taking into account the loss of educational benefits from diversity. Banning AA doesn't hurt minorities any more than it hurts white people, under SCOTUS's current view of AA. To the extent that blacks feel they lose anything else, those other things are not constitutionally legitimate reasons to have AA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429578)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:43 PM
Author: smoky address

Bc AA like all other lib priorities, is premised on lib bullshit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429607)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 1:03 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon jap

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429935)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 12:32 AM
Author: Maniacal khaki roast beef doctorate

because the "diversity" rationale is bullshit that literally nobody with a two working brain cells believe. People either believe AA should be banned or believe it's worthwhile to right past wrongs and/or make outcomes more even.

If people actually thought diversity was worth 15% of the class having a test scores 1.5 STDEV below the median, they'd do something to actually promote diversity on campus. There are countless studies about how to do this (small residential colleges, etc.). But nobody does any of that who wasn't already doing it, because nobody truly believes in the diversity zeitgeist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429823)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 8:26 AM
Author: naked stead boltzmann



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25431013)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:46 PM
Author: Lascivious reading party



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429620)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 12:47 AM
Author: curious misanthropic range jewess

libs also have dat critical | mass | argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25436536)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 12:53 PM
Author: ruddy useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25438534)