His tax proposals would add significantly to the national debt. He also wants to remove the inheritance tax which I'm opposed to.

I oppose protectionism on ideological grounds (major proponent of free trade, like conservatives used to be).

He lacks any foreign policy expertise whatsoever. I could overlook this if he seemed to be interested in learning more about policy, but from what I can tell he is entirely disinterested in this and would rather focus on petty personal disputes and twitter zingers.

He also seems deeply immature and egomaniacal and incapable of reigning in his excesses. I prefer a leader with a calm and collected disposition that can evaluate situations rationally and dispassionately and make the best decision based on the information at hand. He seems more likely to make emotionally-driven decisions.

I like that he's telling SJWs to fuck off and that he has promised greater investment in infrastructure. I'm also glad he's shattered evangelicals' grip on the GOP.

But on balance I don't think he would be a good POTUS. I'm still glad he's in the general and not Cruz though, since I think Cruz is basically a Sith lord (dude's evil and conniving).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30409181)

I have no problem with religious organizations being forced to comply with a mandate like providing birth control pills. Religious exercise and freedom should be respected, but it's not an absolute and I don't think anybody would argue that casting an opinion as based on religion makes that opinion or action driven by that opinion unassailable (extreme example being religious ritualistic sacrifice).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412895)

2. What would the % of foreign muslims would need to support suicide bombing before you said "maybe we should take a closer look at letting these people in until we are confident in our vetting procedures"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413986)

get it through your head: they. arent. fucking. americans.

so its not about freedom of religion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412251)

It's religious discrimination by definition.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412917)

not even a northwestern law grad could be so dense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30420829)

"I can't really refute anything you said, so let me just brush it off by saying that OTHER PEOPLE have responded already"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414346)

A true trumpmo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414367)

1.

not influenced by considerations of personal advantage.

"a banker is under an obligation to give disinterested advice"

synonyms: unbiased, unprejudiced, impartial, neutral, nonpartisan, detached, uninvolved, objective, dispassionate, impersonal, clinical; More

open-minded, fair, just, equitable, balanced, even-handed, with no ax to grind

"disinterested advice"

2.

having or feeling no interest in something.

"her father was so disinterested in her progress that he only visited the school once"

synonyms: uninterested, indifferent, incurious, uncurious, unconcerned, unmoved, unresponsive, impassive, passive, detached, unenthusiastic, lukewarm, bored, apathetic; informalcouldn't-care-less

"he looked at her with disinterested eyes"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413297)

Definition two only exists because proles used it to mean "uninterested" often enough that the dictionary decided to just let the overlap slide, HTH.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413413)

Ljl at you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413419)

in fact, i think i used the word as definition 1 and 2 without realizing uninterested would be better for 2

but, definition 2 makes his use fine and the critique incorrect

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413491)

Both huge prole tells.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413700)

being 1/2 prole, i don't see this as egregious

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413741)

i wish the motherfucker had corrupted the democrats and was their nominee. it's ironic that a democrat who's against pc has no chance to run that schtick as a democrat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30413332)

Sure, he is the most liberal Republican nominee in 30 years...BUT HE HATES WOMEN!!!

Sure, he puts the American worker first...BUT HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT TRADE!!!

Sure, he was the only Republican nominee to say he won't let any American die in the streets with no healthcare...BUT HE'S HITLER!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30411713)

also, they're used to steering what's acceptable to talk about since obama's been elected, framing the debate on immigration, etc. The fact that these pre-2008 ideas are coming back hurts their feelings and threatens their power

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412382)

Modern day Western liberalism is an orthodoxy. Like all orthodoxy it has its tenets by which its adherents define themselves and use as a foundation for their moral code and underpins their rationality.

Such tenets include principles such as diversity, inclusiveness at all costs, a general understanding that past Western history was discriminatory and that classic Western values are no better than other cultural values and so forth.

Donald Trump violates these tenets and it's not just Trump himself but the very act of millions of people voting for Trump that shocks liberals. As always, when the followers of an ideology feel that they are being criticised they are under seige and they feel that the foundations underpinning their orthodoxy is suddenly shaky, they go on the defensive. Hence the over the top Trump hatred, which only reveals their fears and perhaps an inner instinct that their orthodoxy, to which they have devoted much of their sense of worthiness, is actually weak and shallow, or at the least, has fundamental flaws.

The overdrive in attacking Trump is an attempt to ignore that fear.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412508)

Link to the majority of the country being open to building a wall or banning Muslims?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414467)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/18/fox-news-poll-views-on-trumps-proposed-ban-on-non-u-s-muslims.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30416427)

There are stunning shifts in the responses among Democrats: 45 percent favor banning Muslims if Trump’s name is not mentioned, yet when the plan is identified as Trump’s, support drops to 25 percent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30416445)

1. Trump is taking back control of political rhetoric from the left, which in the recent past has allowed them not only to dominate discourse, but to also prevent certain things from even being discussed.

2. Trump is taking a hard line on immigration, which is a natural pipeline for new democratic voters.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412558)

Because libs disagree with Trump on many fundamental issues and ideals?

Libs could ask "Why do reptiles hate Obama so much?"

People disagree about important issues.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412612)

Now tell me you would not think he is so bad, you dumb cumskin faggots.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30412930)

imagine if the dems nominated steve Harvey to be president

they would even have a shit fit if oprah were nominated and she is actually intelligent, thoughtful and well-respected. imagine how many jokes there would be about her being a talk show host and shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30416365)

He's unapologetically masculine and white and x-tian, and thinks these things are not shameful.

He has libs in a convulsive, frothing rage.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414354)

I'm pretty sure he's gone into DETAIL about his favorite passage at a previous press conference.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414448)

Speaking of sheep, is there a single xo meme you don't parrot?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30414496)

it's also the only reason I like him - his economic and foreign policies are utter shit, albeit still better than other Republicans and probably Hillary Clinton.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3214168&forum_id=2#30420864)