The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Reminder: Trump is 100% right on NATO
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:28 PM Author: thriller pit volcanic crater US bearing 75% cost of NATO should be a fckng outrage and countries like Germany with generous social welfare schemes for their own citizens not even spending 2% on national defense and piggy backing on US should be an outrage
the politicians who allowed this to continue for years need to answer |
 |
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:36 PM Author: Abnormal confused tank Agreed rgarding countries like Germany. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037249) |
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:29 PM Author: dun irate filthpig 100% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035354) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:30 PM Author: Jade Mother Liquid Oxygen 10000%. also WHY THE FUCK should we go to war with russia over eastern europe if russia goes to war with latvia or lithuania? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035358) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:31 PM Author: opaque point kitty We should take konigsberg back (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035364) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:36 PM Author: dun irate filthpig CR, fuck eurocucks. Let them defend themselves. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035392) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:41 PM Author: hairraiser roommate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035421) |
|
Date: June 18th, 2018 12:14 AM Author: Racy emerald ticket booth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#36263534) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 4:41 PM Author: hairraiser roommate cr, NATO should be US out to Germany and that's it. It's not the fucking World Cup or something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31035425) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:06 PM Author: Brilliant brunch NATO is definitely a shit deal for the U.S.. who thought it would be worth letting countries like Iceland in (.03% of GDP spent on defense, no deployable army)?
Trump should demand a 2% of GDP annual tribute directly from all NATO members. countries that don't agree will not be protected by the U.S. military for the remainder of his presidency under any circumstance. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:12 PM Author: Iridescent soggy indian lodge Nah, you signal strength and unity externally and demand they pony up internally. Signaling that you might not defend the Baltic states makes Russian aggression more likely. Then we would inevitably go to war anyway and have WW3.
That sort of rhetoric is dangerous and weakens NATO wayyy more than some shit East euro country paying under 2% of their GDP. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:37 PM Author: Abnormal confused tank This pumo speaks the truth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037262) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:13 PM Author: Mischievous Coffee Pot Trust Fund yeah man, let's just pull our military out of europe and everywhere else. we don't need to be the world's foremost military power anymore, right!?!?
(retardmo) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:15 PM Author: Big Bistre Pisswyrm Messiness does it really matter if we have to fight WWIII in Poland rather than France? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037029) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:20 PM Author: Mischievous Coffee Pot Trust Fund does it matter that we might not have to fight wwiii at all? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037085) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:22 PM Author: Big Bistre Pisswyrm Messiness wait, so Russia's calculus will be "well we can quickly advance on some shit eastern European nations without tanks in our way but the response will ultimately be the same just a few hundred miles east, so fuck it, let's start WWIII"
makes sense, totally worth any price, no way our presence closer and closer to their border makes war at all more likely |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:24 PM Author: thriller pit volcanic crater where did he suggest that dumbass? he said NATO should be restructured to also deal with threat of terrorism (correct) and that all countries should meet their obligations if they want the benefit of US protections (correct)
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:29 PM Author: Brilliant brunch clearly the security of european countries is far more threatened by a withdrawal of the U.S. military from Europe than our own security is. they should be willing to pay for this protection then, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037179) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:27 PM Author: Provocative Rusted Roast Beef Philosopher-king Do we wanna be the boss? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037154) |
|
Date: June 18th, 2018 12:15 AM Author: Racy emerald ticket booth If all that means is paying for everyone, how about no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#36263537) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:32 PM Author: disturbing idiotic garrison Europe is threatened by Islam and not by Russia. NATO is ridiculous and a pure US instrument of attack. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037218) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 8:34 PM Author: Charismatic tanning salon Some common sense here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#31037230) |
|
Date: June 18th, 2018 12:14 AM Author: Racy emerald ticket booth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#36263530) |
|
Date: June 18th, 2018 12:11 AM Author: Geriatric athletic conference (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3301831&forum_id=2#36263518) |