The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Recent HLS grad attacks XOXO...
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:02 PM Author: appetizing field http://www.law.harvard.edu/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737016) |
 |
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:04 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library you know her? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737040) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:05 PM Author: appetizing field why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737045) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library why else would you read her boring-ass blog? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737066) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: appetizing field good point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737086) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:14 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library this also explains why you just subjected her to XOXO scrutiny. good show.
and another good reason i'll be cold in hell before i blog. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:15 PM Author: appetizing field in fairness, she does post here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737128) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library whatever, i think it's fair too, i mean she puts all this stuff up on the net herself, it's inviting scrutiny. in some sense, such people want it to feed their attention whore desires. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737187) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:18 PM Author: kink-friendly forum hominid blogs are boring as hell, except for maybe like 5 in the whole world. it suggests that someone thinks very highly of themselves to blog too (although I didn't bother to read this girl's blog, so I'm not saying her specifically, just bloggers in general). I just don't have the attention span for it.
IRL people have witty thing to say, he write book and get published, internet people have thing to say he write blog and have teenage girls leave comments. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:20 PM Author: appetizing field or you could be like jeremy blachman and write 2 blogs and get a lucrative book deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737174) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:21 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library and be a complete and utter loser at life besides. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737179) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: appetizing field he's actually a nice, harmless guy. he's quite funny in person; it just doesn't translate into his blog (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737190) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library dude, you are normally more angry and vicious. what the fuck happened? where is the fire tonight? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737208) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: appetizing field jb is ok. let's not divert this conversation from blogging feminists (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737230) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: kink-friendly forum hominid I don't have the stamina, but good on him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737229) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:06 PM Author: Burgundy nubile senate who is this douche? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737050) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:06 PM Author: appetizing field it's a chick who graduated in june (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737053) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Burgundy nubile senate I'd bang her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737061) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate what a pretentious loser. "Poppycock." i hope this person gets their head sliced off by a chainsaw and fed to the fucking pigeons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737056) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: flickering stage haha, anyone want to offer odds on whether the above post will be quoted and discussed as a possible source of internet harrassment? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737069) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:09 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate it may dood. it may (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737081) |
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: carmine federal ticket booth Post her pic so I can comment on how ugly and fat she is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737059) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: appetizing field she's neither
|
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: carmine federal ticket booth She is an unattractice overly Jewish looking girl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737073) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:09 PM Author: appetizing field she's not even close to jewish (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737083) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: carmine federal ticket booth She exudes Jewishness to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737090) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: appetizing field nope, she's not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737093) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:13 PM Author: kink-friendly forum hominid she's also apparently deceased (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737113) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:19 PM Author: boyish glassy stage how is that an attack? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737161) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:20 PM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse I'm very confused. How did she attack this site? Unless I missed something, her post seems pretty reasonable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737177) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate am I in trouble? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737191) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: appetizing field yes, but that's b/c i'm hiding under your bed with a butcher knife (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737204) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:31 PM Author: buff clown roast beef Why would you be in trouble dooder? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737279) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate It appears I cause all this trouble (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737289) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:23 PM Author: appetizing field That we're shallow, superficial and worse, she takes Jill H's side. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737195) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate dood did I say anything wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737210) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:27 PM Author: appetizing field legally, perhaps.
morally, yes.
factually, no. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:29 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate how is it legally and morally wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737258) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:33 PM Author: appetizing field defamation (though she's a public figure so you're okay there), possibly fraud if you are not a cool dude.
morally, uhm, yeah it's okay I guess |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:42 PM Author: talented harsh principal's office I don't think she is a public figure for defamation purposes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737409) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:16 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse She's almost certainly a limited purpose public figure within the Gertz framework. I can't imagine a court finding otherwise, given that for the past year she's spouted off on political issues to a potential audience of millions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737793) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: buff clown roast beef Why would it be against the law to call Jill fat? Although she isn't fat, it was your opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737295) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:14 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Well, if you really believe that then I think you're making the same mistake the commentators made on Jill's blog. While she might be taking Jill's "side," it's only in a very narrow sense, by saying that xo is pretty damn critical when it comes to physical attractiveness and tends to be most critical when critiquing outsiders/enemies and least critical when dealing with active well-liked posters (and come on, is anyone really going to claim that there isn't at least some truth in that statement?). Her post is thus far the most fair blog post I've seen on this issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737764) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:58 AM Author: Concupiscible sienna yarmulke dilemma 'xo' isn't shit. Use qualifiers or other appropriate clarifiers, please. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738848) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:43 PM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base She narrowly construes the dynamic of this site to mount a case for fatties. Hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737413) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:10 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse How? If anything she's the only blogger who hasn't completely misconstrued the site. I quote:
"At least some of the posters on the board are actual admitted and current students at elite law schools. I posted on XOXOHTH and its predecessor board as an admit and (very occasionally) as an HLS student. So did several other HLSers and YLSers of my acquaintance. It's actually a very useful resource during periods where time-sensitive announcements are being made, like law firm recruiting, admissions, and law review decisions."
As for the rest, it's just fair criticism. This, for example, I agree with for the most part:
"The board participants commonly praise as attractive women who are useful members of the community and run down outsiders/political opponents as unattractive with almost no correlation to actual appearances."
I really don't see any attacks here whatsoever. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:20 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Well, I wasn't really arguing that, but it's funny that you cite a relatively favorable comment as evidence that the site is construed correctly there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737856) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:23 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Well, how was it incorrectly construed? I've read the post multiple times and don't see anything that stands out as horribly inaccurate (in contrast to the Feministe posts where virtually everything I read about the site was blatantly wrong or misleading). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737900) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:28 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base "Well, how was it incorrectly construed?"
It wasn't, especially. The post, in fact, seems to have very little to do with xoxo. You don't need to read it any more times. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:23 PM Author: primrose spectacular locus circlehead jeez, you can trace the response across the blogosphere... http://hugoboy.typepad.com/hugo_schwyzer/2006/01/a_note_about_bl.html http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2006/01/do_not_stare_at.html |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:25 PM Author: laughsome iridescent roommate library them bloggers, they stick together, sure do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737215) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:19 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Not really. Remember, pretty much every blogger who responded to Leiter's juvenile tirades against us took our side. Same when Leiter tried to out Juan Non-Volokh.
And even in this situation, this HLS blogger is greatly distancing herself from most of Jill's positions and taking a very moderate stance that's pretty difficult to disagree with (which of you wants to make the argument that xo isn't harsh when critiquing looks?). Also don't forget that Mens News Daily blogger went against Jill. However most bloggers probably (correctly) don't give a shit about this fiasco. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:40 PM Author: crusty reading party This proves once and for all that the phenomenon of blogging is, for the most part, incredibly fucking retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737381) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:20 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Agreed. Some blogs are pretty damn good, but unfortunately 99% of them are pretty damn bad. There was an interesting article about this on townhall.com a week or so ago actually. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737863) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: azure hell philosopher-king ehh, not really an attack. It's a fair criticism of the board.
That said, that blog is absolutely worthless. Absolutely boring to read with the author trying way too hard. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:29 PM Author: appetizing field The only blog not worthless is balkanization.
The criticism was attention-whoring without any conviction such as straight out saying "xoxo sucks." |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: azure hell philosopher-king actually, more often than not, I like the blogs that I come across.
The horrid writing and grating design on this one temporarily made my eyes bleed. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate she tries way too hard to sound intelligent (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737296) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:34 PM Author: appetizing field wow, what i'd love to say right now as to why (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737317) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:36 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate is she a minority? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737341) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:39 PM Author: appetizing field no, she's white and from a white state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737373) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:40 PM Author: Bipolar degenerate I'm stuck then as to why (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737382) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:41 PM Author: appetizing field too personal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737389) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:25 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Maybe I'm completely misreading the post, but I don't see how she said we suck. She criticized us (rather accurately) on an extremely narrow issue, and said that otherwise it's actually a very useful resource. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737925) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:46 PM Author: Cracking Hairless Native Headpube Chicks are dumb about the internets. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737448) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:09 AM Author: green stirring state Hi. I'm the author of the linked blog. A few points:
1. Yes, the design of my blog sucks. 2. Yes, the writing is pretentious and of interest to only a few. 3. Yes, I posted here in the past, mostly after the HLS law review competition in 2003. 4. Jill at Feministe is objectively not fat or ugly, for whatever that's worth. I don't know her, but I'm not blind.
MoreDoughHi, I'm curious about what personal facts you know about me. Feel free to email. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:10 AM Author: Contagious Site Newt You have a good sense of humor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737720) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:12 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Why do you object to anorexia as a fashion ideal? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737747) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:14 AM Author: appetizing field Why do you want me to email you personal facts? And which facts: Who you dated? Where you clerk?
I knew you'd come here and post, and my point was proven that you were defending Jill even though your brand of feminism isn't as hypocritical hers (you don't spend hours putting on makeup before a Steinem rally).
This site has very discriminating tastes, and you blogging about it just to defend a female feminist, per se, is itself, distasteful and attention-whoring. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:28 AM Author: green stirring state Why? I was curious about who you were and what personal facts you apparently find so psychologically revealing. You obviously went to/attend HLS and don't like me very much, but that doesn't really narrow it down. Lots of people know who I dated and where I clerk, so that doesn't help either.
I find this site sometimes useful and sometimes distasteful. If you don't like my opinion, don't read my boring, poorly designed, low-traffic blog. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:34 AM Author: appetizing field First, I don't hate you at all. If I did, I'd reveal whatever I wanted to do without regard for what the vultures here would do to you. I have no problem with you.
The quibble I have is that you took the cheap, common target, XOXO has misogynist posters and are using it to presumably to widen your audience. I never said your blog is crap; I said balkanization is the only one I find worthwhile. There's a large distinction since I do much that isn't worthwhile.
The reason you posted this is because you felt you had to add something to the Jill H crap that's so against XOXO so as to confirm some weird notion of what you think it means to be a feminist. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:46 AM Author: green stirring state Didn't say you hated me. I think I know who you are now.
If I were really trying to widen my audience, I would have spammed Hugo, Jill, and Amanda's comments sections and trackbacks to get people to look at my post, which probably would have backfired, since I didn't virulently attack the board.
I actually posted this because, despite the conflict between the behavior of some people on the board and my notions of what it means to be a feminist, I wanted to post a qualified defense of XOXOHTH. You were being, in some respects, unfairly characterized. Presumably my post was mostly ineffective, since I did not do the aforementioned spamming, but as you pointed out I have a clerkship and thus other work to do. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:50 AM Author: appetizing field Cool. Well I deleted your links in this thread. You did get to this board quick, but we know it's not like you have real work to do for your judge.
|
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: Pea-brained Wonderful Parlour Elastic Band I tought she took a fair and measured approach to the whole subject. You're either trying to piss this woman off or you have some serious issues with "feminism". By "feminism" I mean women.
Maybe I'm mistaking you for someone else, but I seem to remeber you being a decent poster. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:27 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse Thanks for being reasonable, unlike a lot of the other idiots out there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737950) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: Bipolar degenerate "4. Jill at Feministe is objectively not fat or ugly, for whatever that's worth. I don't know her, but I'm not blind. "
dood why do you dumb bitches take everyhting people say so fucking literally? can you not take a fucking joke? Holy shit, no wonder you're stuck in law. Kill yourself. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:13 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Repost Jill, such that I may decide whether or not she is a fattie. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738458) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:19 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction If I'm not mistaken, she's in the famous rowan pic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738516) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:21 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base I don't know that, dude. Repost/direct me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738536) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:22 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction You forgot you're the one who cares. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738544) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:23 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base heh. I'm just trying to drive to the fatty/or not root of the problem. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738563) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:41 AM Author: green stirring state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738696) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:42 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction I was trying not to be too obnoxious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738709) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:04 AM Author: Concupiscible sienna yarmulke dilemma Be wary of anyone with such a passive/agressive moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738901) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:44 AM Author: Khaki Sex Offender Faggotry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739223) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:08 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction Subject: I like that blogger. This chick is cute, smarter than me, and a recovering Randite. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738404) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:50 AM Author: Ruddy charismatic university hissy fit link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738776) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:06 AM Author: sable irradiated selfie crackhouse http://bamber.blogspot.com/2006/01/internet-beauty-standards.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738926) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:03 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base ding! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738896) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:08 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction She came back dood, with an answer to your question. BTW, to me, she appears to be of normal or regular build. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:11 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Evidently she didn't have the courage of her convictions, because I only see ellipses. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738977) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:21 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction plenty of links off that page gto posted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739058) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:25 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base This? http://bamber.blogspot.com/2006/01/internet-beauty-standards.html
|
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:27 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction try, o I dunno... THE AUTHOR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739094) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:27 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base I have no idea what you're talking about anymore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739102) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:29 AM Author: orange patrolman dysfunction Have you ever clicked on a link on a web page? I was thinking you had, somehow. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:31 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Dude, this is all too meta for me. Where did she answer a question I asked, and which question was it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739132) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:30 AM Author: Khaki Sex Offender Faggotry Yes, she's not really trying to conceal her identity
http://flickr.com/photos/37996584264@N01/sets/182803/ |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:34 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base Thanks. Is that the author of the blog post, or the girl the author referred to as being unfairly slurred on XO? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739149) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:35 AM Author: Khaki Sex Offender Faggotry That's the author of the blog post. She seems smart and reasonable and used to post on xoxo in the past. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739155) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:40 AM Author: Topaz Odious Pocket Flask Base I think she's quite attractive there, and has an intelligent face; but the red overcoat and bizarre headgear look like a casting call for Designing Women. Very TTT. That said, I obviously can't tell what her body is like through the clothes, and so can't assess as I proposed to in an earlier post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739190) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:35 AM Author: Ruddy charismatic university hissy fit where, exactly, is the "attack"???? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739160) |