The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Recent HLS grad attacks XOXO...
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:02 PM Author: rambunctious psychic http://www.law.harvard.edu/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737016) |
 |
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:04 PM Author: garnet box office pervert you know her? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737040) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:05 PM Author: rambunctious psychic why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737045) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: garnet box office pervert why else would you read her boring-ass blog? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737066) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: rambunctious psychic good point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737086) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:14 PM Author: garnet box office pervert this also explains why you just subjected her to XOXO scrutiny. good show.
and another good reason i'll be cold in hell before i blog. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:15 PM Author: rambunctious psychic in fairness, she does post here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737128) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: garnet box office pervert whatever, i think it's fair too, i mean she puts all this stuff up on the net herself, it's inviting scrutiny. in some sense, such people want it to feed their attention whore desires. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737187) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:18 PM Author: Wonderful cuckoldry school cafeteria blogs are boring as hell, except for maybe like 5 in the whole world. it suggests that someone thinks very highly of themselves to blog too (although I didn't bother to read this girl's blog, so I'm not saying her specifically, just bloggers in general). I just don't have the attention span for it.
IRL people have witty thing to say, he write book and get published, internet people have thing to say he write blog and have teenage girls leave comments. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:20 PM Author: rambunctious psychic or you could be like jeremy blachman and write 2 blogs and get a lucrative book deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737174) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:21 PM Author: garnet box office pervert and be a complete and utter loser at life besides. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737179) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: rambunctious psychic he's actually a nice, harmless guy. he's quite funny in person; it just doesn't translate into his blog (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737190) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: garnet box office pervert dude, you are normally more angry and vicious. what the fuck happened? where is the fire tonight? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737208) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: rambunctious psychic jb is ok. let's not divert this conversation from blogging feminists (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737230) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: Wonderful cuckoldry school cafeteria I don't have the stamina, but good on him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737229) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:06 PM Author: Glassy dingle berry circlehead who is this douche? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737050) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:06 PM Author: rambunctious psychic it's a chick who graduated in june (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737053) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Glassy dingle berry circlehead I'd bang her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737061) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap what a pretentious loser. "Poppycock." i hope this person gets their head sliced off by a chainsaw and fed to the fucking pigeons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737056) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: lavender laser beams haha, anyone want to offer odds on whether the above post will be quoted and discussed as a possible source of internet harrassment? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737069) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:09 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap it may dood. it may (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737081) |
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Topaz bearded trust fund halford Post her pic so I can comment on how ugly and fat she is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737059) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: rambunctious psychic she's neither
|
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:08 PM Author: Topaz bearded trust fund halford She is an unattractice overly Jewish looking girl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737073) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:09 PM Author: rambunctious psychic she's not even close to jewish (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737083) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: Topaz bearded trust fund halford She exudes Jewishness to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737090) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:10 PM Author: rambunctious psychic nope, she's not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737093) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:13 PM Author: Wonderful cuckoldry school cafeteria she's also apparently deceased (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737113) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:19 PM Author: yellow odious meetinghouse how is that an attack? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737161) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:20 PM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven I'm very confused. How did she attack this site? Unless I missed something, her post seems pretty reasonable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737177) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap am I in trouble? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737191) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: rambunctious psychic yes, but that's b/c i'm hiding under your bed with a butcher knife (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737204) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:31 PM Author: Hairless travel guidebook organic girlfriend Why would you be in trouble dooder? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737279) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap It appears I cause all this trouble (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737289) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:23 PM Author: rambunctious psychic That we're shallow, superficial and worse, she takes Jill H's side. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737195) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap dood did I say anything wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737210) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:27 PM Author: rambunctious psychic legally, perhaps.
morally, yes.
factually, no. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:29 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap how is it legally and morally wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737258) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:33 PM Author: rambunctious psychic defamation (though she's a public figure so you're okay there), possibly fraud if you are not a cool dude.
morally, uhm, yeah it's okay I guess |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:42 PM Author: bateful shimmering church building yarmulke I don't think she is a public figure for defamation purposes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737409) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:16 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven She's almost certainly a limited purpose public figure within the Gertz framework. I can't imagine a court finding otherwise, given that for the past year she's spouted off on political issues to a potential audience of millions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737793) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: Hairless travel guidebook organic girlfriend Why would it be against the law to call Jill fat? Although she isn't fat, it was your opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737295) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:14 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Well, if you really believe that then I think you're making the same mistake the commentators made on Jill's blog. While she might be taking Jill's "side," it's only in a very narrow sense, by saying that xo is pretty damn critical when it comes to physical attractiveness and tends to be most critical when critiquing outsiders/enemies and least critical when dealing with active well-liked posters (and come on, is anyone really going to claim that there isn't at least some truth in that statement?). Her post is thus far the most fair blog post I've seen on this issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737764) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:58 AM Author: Ungodly aphrodisiac state 'xo' isn't shit. Use qualifiers or other appropriate clarifiers, please. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738848) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:43 PM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker She narrowly construes the dynamic of this site to mount a case for fatties. Hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737413) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:10 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven How? If anything she's the only blogger who hasn't completely misconstrued the site. I quote:
"At least some of the posters on the board are actual admitted and current students at elite law schools. I posted on XOXOHTH and its predecessor board as an admit and (very occasionally) as an HLS student. So did several other HLSers and YLSers of my acquaintance. It's actually a very useful resource during periods where time-sensitive announcements are being made, like law firm recruiting, admissions, and law review decisions."
As for the rest, it's just fair criticism. This, for example, I agree with for the most part:
"The board participants commonly praise as attractive women who are useful members of the community and run down outsiders/political opponents as unattractive with almost no correlation to actual appearances."
I really don't see any attacks here whatsoever. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:20 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Well, I wasn't really arguing that, but it's funny that you cite a relatively favorable comment as evidence that the site is construed correctly there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737856) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:23 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Well, how was it incorrectly construed? I've read the post multiple times and don't see anything that stands out as horribly inaccurate (in contrast to the Feministe posts where virtually everything I read about the site was blatantly wrong or misleading). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737900) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:28 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker "Well, how was it incorrectly construed?"
It wasn't, especially. The post, in fact, seems to have very little to do with xoxo. You don't need to read it any more times. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:23 PM Author: Erotic federal incel jeez, you can trace the response across the blogosphere... http://hugoboy.typepad.com/hugo_schwyzer/2006/01/a_note_about_bl.html http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2006/01/do_not_stare_at.html |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:25 PM Author: garnet box office pervert them bloggers, they stick together, sure do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737215) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:19 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Not really. Remember, pretty much every blogger who responded to Leiter's juvenile tirades against us took our side. Same when Leiter tried to out Juan Non-Volokh.
And even in this situation, this HLS blogger is greatly distancing herself from most of Jill's positions and taking a very moderate stance that's pretty difficult to disagree with (which of you wants to make the argument that xo isn't harsh when critiquing looks?). Also don't forget that Mens News Daily blogger went against Jill. However most bloggers probably (correctly) don't give a shit about this fiasco. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:40 PM Author: White curious sound barrier immigrant This proves once and for all that the phenomenon of blogging is, for the most part, incredibly fucking retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737381) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:20 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Agreed. Some blogs are pretty damn good, but unfortunately 99% of them are pretty damn bad. There was an interesting article about this on townhall.com a week or so ago actually. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737863) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: zombie-like hideous theatre crotch ehh, not really an attack. It's a fair criticism of the board.
That said, that blog is absolutely worthless. Absolutely boring to read with the author trying way too hard. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:29 PM Author: rambunctious psychic The only blog not worthless is balkanization.
The criticism was attention-whoring without any conviction such as straight out saying "xoxo sucks." |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: zombie-like hideous theatre crotch actually, more often than not, I like the blogs that I come across.
The horrid writing and grating design on this one temporarily made my eyes bleed. |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:32 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap she tries way too hard to sound intelligent (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737296) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:34 PM Author: rambunctious psychic wow, what i'd love to say right now as to why (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737317) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:36 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap is she a minority? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737341) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:39 PM Author: rambunctious psychic no, she's white and from a white state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737373) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:40 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap I'm stuck then as to why (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737382) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:41 PM Author: rambunctious psychic too personal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737389) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:25 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Maybe I'm completely misreading the post, but I don't see how she said we suck. She criticized us (rather accurately) on an extremely narrow issue, and said that otherwise it's actually a very useful resource. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737925) |
|
Date: January 4th, 2006 11:46 PM Author: naked old irish cottage Chicks are dumb about the internets. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737448) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:09 AM Author: Vibrant crackhouse sex offender Hi. I'm the author of the linked blog. A few points:
1. Yes, the design of my blog sucks. 2. Yes, the writing is pretentious and of interest to only a few. 3. Yes, I posted here in the past, mostly after the HLS law review competition in 2003. 4. Jill at Feministe is objectively not fat or ugly, for whatever that's worth. I don't know her, but I'm not blind.
MoreDoughHi, I'm curious about what personal facts you know about me. Feel free to email. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:10 AM Author: Startling Chad You have a good sense of humor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737720) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:12 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Why do you object to anorexia as a fashion ideal? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737747) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:14 AM Author: rambunctious psychic Why do you want me to email you personal facts? And which facts: Who you dated? Where you clerk?
I knew you'd come here and post, and my point was proven that you were defending Jill even though your brand of feminism isn't as hypocritical hers (you don't spend hours putting on makeup before a Steinem rally).
This site has very discriminating tastes, and you blogging about it just to defend a female feminist, per se, is itself, distasteful and attention-whoring. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:28 AM Author: Vibrant crackhouse sex offender Why? I was curious about who you were and what personal facts you apparently find so psychologically revealing. You obviously went to/attend HLS and don't like me very much, but that doesn't really narrow it down. Lots of people know who I dated and where I clerk, so that doesn't help either.
I find this site sometimes useful and sometimes distasteful. If you don't like my opinion, don't read my boring, poorly designed, low-traffic blog. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:34 AM Author: rambunctious psychic First, I don't hate you at all. If I did, I'd reveal whatever I wanted to do without regard for what the vultures here would do to you. I have no problem with you.
The quibble I have is that you took the cheap, common target, XOXO has misogynist posters and are using it to presumably to widen your audience. I never said your blog is crap; I said balkanization is the only one I find worthwhile. There's a large distinction since I do much that isn't worthwhile.
The reason you posted this is because you felt you had to add something to the Jill H crap that's so against XOXO so as to confirm some weird notion of what you think it means to be a feminist. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:46 AM Author: Vibrant crackhouse sex offender Didn't say you hated me. I think I know who you are now.
If I were really trying to widen my audience, I would have spammed Hugo, Jill, and Amanda's comments sections and trackbacks to get people to look at my post, which probably would have backfired, since I didn't virulently attack the board.
I actually posted this because, despite the conflict between the behavior of some people on the board and my notions of what it means to be a feminist, I wanted to post a qualified defense of XOXOHTH. You were being, in some respects, unfairly characterized. Presumably my post was mostly ineffective, since I did not do the aforementioned spamming, but as you pointed out I have a clerkship and thus other work to do. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:50 AM Author: rambunctious psychic Cool. Well I deleted your links in this thread. You did get to this board quick, but we know it's not like you have real work to do for your judge.
|
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: adulterous pontificating blood rage I tought she took a fair and measured approach to the whole subject. You're either trying to piss this woman off or you have some serious issues with "feminism". By "feminism" I mean women.
Maybe I'm mistaking you for someone else, but I seem to remeber you being a decent poster. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:27 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven Thanks for being reasonable, unlike a lot of the other idiots out there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4737950) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: Razzle-dazzle field mad-dog skullcap "4. Jill at Feministe is objectively not fat or ugly, for whatever that's worth. I don't know her, but I'm not blind. "
dood why do you dumb bitches take everyhting people say so fucking literally? can you not take a fucking joke? Holy shit, no wonder you're stuck in law. Kill yourself. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:13 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Repost Jill, such that I may decide whether or not she is a fattie. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738458) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:19 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky If I'm not mistaken, she's in the famous rowan pic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738516) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:21 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker I don't know that, dude. Repost/direct me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738536) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:22 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky You forgot you're the one who cares. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738544) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:23 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker heh. I'm just trying to drive to the fatty/or not root of the problem. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738563) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:41 AM Author: Vibrant crackhouse sex offender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738696) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:42 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky I was trying not to be too obnoxious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738709) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:04 AM Author: Ungodly aphrodisiac state Be wary of anyone with such a passive/agressive moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738901) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:44 AM Author: Jet Titillating Ticket Booth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739223) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:08 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky Subject: I like that blogger. This chick is cute, smarter than me, and a recovering Randite. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738404) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 1:50 AM Author: well-lubricated ocher stage link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738776) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:06 AM Author: chocolate electric furnace heaven http://bamber.blogspot.com/2006/01/internet-beauty-standards.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738926) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:03 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker ding! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738896) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:08 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky She came back dood, with an answer to your question. BTW, to me, she appears to be of normal or regular build. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:11 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Evidently she didn't have the courage of her convictions, because I only see ellipses. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4738977) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:21 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky plenty of links off that page gto posted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739058) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:25 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker This? http://bamber.blogspot.com/2006/01/internet-beauty-standards.html
|
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:27 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky try, o I dunno... THE AUTHOR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739094) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:27 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker I have no idea what you're talking about anymore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739102) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:29 AM Author: onyx sadistic bbw becky Have you ever clicked on a link on a web page? I was thinking you had, somehow. |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:31 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Dude, this is all too meta for me. Where did she answer a question I asked, and which question was it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739132) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:30 AM Author: Jet Titillating Ticket Booth Yes, she's not really trying to conceal her identity
http://flickr.com/photos/37996584264@N01/sets/182803/ |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:34 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker Thanks. Is that the author of the blog post, or the girl the author referred to as being unfairly slurred on XO? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739149) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:35 AM Author: Jet Titillating Ticket Booth That's the author of the blog post. She seems smart and reasonable and used to post on xoxo in the past. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739155) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:40 AM Author: soul-stirring lodge windowlicker I think she's quite attractive there, and has an intelligent face; but the red overcoat and bizarre headgear look like a casting call for Designing Women. Very TTT. That said, I obviously can't tell what her body is like through the clothes, and so can't assess as I proposed to in an earlier post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739190) |
|
Date: January 5th, 2006 2:35 AM Author: well-lubricated ocher stage where, exactly, is the "attack"???? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=333059&forum_id=2#4739160) |