\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Biggest biglaw fuck up you made?

My biggest "fuck-up" resulted from not bringing a ...
''"'''"'''"'
  03/18/17
Wait, so your assignment was literally to print a bunch of s...
....::::..::..,,....,........,..,,,,,.
  03/18/17
For that particular meeting, basically yes. I was also taske...
''"'''"'''"'
  03/18/17
sorry, bro, this one's on you you're clearly not anal e...
Punctuation Monica
  03/18/17
...
''"'''"'''"'
  03/18/17
Produced a bunch of privileged docs as a first year. Nothing...
90s | obese | jamaal
  03/18/17
The first one is very bad. The other two are biglaw fantasy ...
twins
  03/19/17
as a summer associate, I was asked to do a survey of state c...
"""'''"""
  03/18/17
Not a substantive fuckup, but I once sent to a partner a dra...
Jim_Kelly
  03/18/17
That partner sounds like a sociopath
Non sequitur
  03/18/17
She kind of is. I worked for one once who INSISTED that I...
Jim_Kelly
  03/18/17
Ur firm sounds worse than biglaw
Non sequitur
  03/18/17
Two separate firms. The business card asshole was at a firm...
Jim_Kelly
  03/18/17
the business card thing is almost comical and it makes me wo...
Punctuation Monica
  03/18/17
There's a chance -- everyone hated that fucker.
Jim_Kelly
  03/19/17
I once passed out on a partner - we were sending drafts back...
90s | obese | jamaal
  03/18/17
Lmao Fucking partners
Non sequitur
  03/18/17
lol, the waiting game at that level is just the worst. My f...
Jim_Kelly
  03/18/17
hurry up and wait
Punctuation Monica
  03/18/17
bahahaha. because he needs you to accept changes of course. ...
Link Gaetz*
  03/19/17
that's not passing out, that's just being a normal human bei...
Punctuation Monica
  03/18/17
Lol op, partners are assholes. What he did made everything l...
donny (retired)
  03/18/17
indexes* "indices" if you're talking about metr...
The Fruit Salad of Their Life
  03/18/17
i was phone posting and thought i'd be kewt
donny (retired)
  03/18/17
Correct though I think you can get away with using either pl...
twentynine
  03/18/17
forgot to make a DACA contingent upon an event of default. o...
.,.,.,,.,.,.,,..,..,,,...,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.
  03/18/17
Accepting an offer
colt tp
  03/18/17
...
.,.,.,,.,.,.,,..,..,,,...,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.
  03/18/17
this times INFINITY
Punctuation Monica
  03/18/17
...
PrestigeWhore
  03/18/17
...
I strongly feel this is an insult to life itself
  03/18/17
...
Ringo Starr
  03/18/17
...
Aspie Pickup Line
  03/18/17
...
Judah Ben Jamin
  03/19/17
...
Mainlining the secret truth of the universe
  03/19/17
I made an error In a footnote in a brief for a motion to dis...
._._._._.._._._._.._._._._.._._._._.
  03/18/17
Moar, u sweet scholarly whores.
[_____Signature Line_____]
  03/18/17
...
uspo (retired)
  03/18/17
I accidentally underlined the colon in "Note to Draft:&...
Link Gaetz*
  03/18/17
Damn. U have got to be kidding me. An underlined colon cause...
[_____Signature Line_____]
  03/18/17
The key is to not give a fuck if they don't like you anymore...
Link Gaetz*
  03/19/17
Yea, I stopped caring after the shitty review. I was in a sm...
[_____Signature Line_____]
  03/19/17
oh but the worst mistake was deleting a KEY closing conditio...
Link Gaetz*
  03/18/17
Was this internal? If so, not so bad. Did the partner ask u ...
[_____Signature Line_____]
  03/19/17
I've said this before but I mixed subpoenas up and sent them...
corporate warrior poet
  03/19/17
forgot 2 add the "this doc remains subject to our clien...
"""'"'''
  03/19/17
Pulled together a binder of all the briefing, relevant exhib...
joeybank aka Crypto Eyez Killah
  03/19/17
did he say why he needed double sided?
.,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::..,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,.
  03/19/17
I positively dislike double sided particularly for something...
twentynine
  03/19/17
I poasted about mine here: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php...
..,..,..,...,,,...,..,.,,.,..,.,,
  03/19/17
I'm surprised more ex-biglaw dudes don't come here and to tl...
LongTimeLurker1stTimePoaster
  03/19/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:10 PM
Author: ''"'''"'''"'


My biggest "fuck-up" resulted from not bringing a laptop to a meeting held in one of our firm's conference rooms and not realizing that depo transcripts were not always printed with indexes.

As a first-year I was helping prepare an expert for a trial the following year. We had scheduled a meeting with the expert to discuss his analysis of opposing expert's report and to sketch out the timeline for our own work. It was mainly supposed to be a refresher for the expert on what the case was about and what we needed from him, because it had been several years since he last worked on the case. Partner asked me to prepare 6 copies of various materials including a transcript of the expert's deposition. I relayed the things we needed to the paralegals on the team and checked that all the materials were prepared and ready for the meeting.

The meeting was to be held in one of our firm's conference rooms. At prior meetings with the team, I had always brought just a legal pad and paper, instead of my laptop. That had never caused any problems. So for this meeting, I did the same and gave no second thought to whether we needed a laptop.

During the meeting, which was going well, a small issue came up regarding whether the opposing expert made a particular point, either in his deposition or in his report, or somewhere else, or perhaps never made that point at all. I didn't remember seeing that point made anywhere, but couldn't be 100% certain it didn't exist.

The junior partner on the case, who was the person I worked for, wanted to check the deposition transcript copies to see whether that point was made during the deposition. He picked up a copy and looked for an index in the back that tracked the page numbers on which words and phrases appeared. There was no index.

Apparently, when you print out these deposition transcripts, there are options available for what to include with the printout, including whether to make an index. I had no idea, because every other transcript copy I saw in the case came with an index. It did not cross my mind at all that the program would default to printing without an index.

When he couldn't find the index, the partner lost his shit and became visibly upset and red in the face. He looked at me in the middle of the meeting and said "We can't find what we're looking for. These copies don't help at all." He paged through the transcript for 5-10 seconds. "Where's the index? Why wouldn't you print the index?"

I didn't answer his question but instead offered to go upstairs to my office and bring my laptop down so we could run some searches. "We don't have time for that now, can you look through this copy and find whether the expert said [the point]?" He handed me the copy, obviously knowing that I wouldn't be able to do what he asked. Like a beta first-year bitch, I made an attempt to look for the statement, and then said "I don't remember him saying it anywhere, but I'll need to search the database later to confirm."

During this back and forth with the junior partner, the expert and his assistant, as well as the senior partner on the case, who was far less anal, remained silent and seemed embarrassed. We moved on to other issues and the meeting concluded 15-20 minutes later.

Back in my office, I seethed. I recognized that what happened was, in some sense, my fault, because I could have checked for an index (even though I wasn't aware of the possibility that the transcript would be printed without an index), and I could have brought my laptop to the meeting so that it was easier to access. But regardless, what was especially grating about the situation was the way the partner handled it. Had he been someone kinder and more charismatic, he could have minimized my mistake and moved the meeting along. He could have asked me to go upstairs and search for the point, or allowed me to get my laptop when I offered. But instead, he made the whole situation strange and embarrassing. It's almost as if his goal was to make me feel like I fucked-up rather than to actually address the issue.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861479)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:13 PM
Author: ....::::..::..,,....,........,..,,,,,.


Wait, so your assignment was literally to print a bunch of stuff out? And you still fucked it up? Ljl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861509)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:15 PM
Author: ''"'''"'''"'


For that particular meeting, basically yes. I was also tasked with being generally aware of the points we wanted to make and to be familiar with the relevant issues.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861525)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:23 PM
Author: Punctuation Monica

sorry, bro, this one's on you

you're clearly not anal enough for BIGLAW

(which is a good thing.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862454)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:29 PM
Author: ''"'''"'''"'




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861617)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:37 PM
Author: 90s | obese | jamaal

Produced a bunch of privileged docs as a first year. Nothing was important but it was embarrassing. Senior partner (and, for that matter, the client) didn't care, but the junior partner went ballistic.

Submitted a brief with a ton of mistakes. Partner made a ton of last minute (literally, hours before filing) changes and I only had caught some of the dozens of typos, erroneous references, etc. he inserted into the brief. I reread it a month later and thought "holy shit, this is bad." Not just biglaw nitpicking a typo here or there, but mistakes you see from shitlaw firms.

Once edited and proofed a brief given to me by co-counsel. It seemed fine. Had our in-house cite checkers cite check it. They missed a dead wrong cite - a clearly overturned case - that the other side then spent half a page on in their reply discussing how we were dishonest, etc. etc. The court didn't really care but the senior associate on the case went nuts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861660)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 11:00 PM
Author: twins

The first one is very bad. The other two are biglaw fantasy world bad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870489)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:39 PM
Author: """'''"""


as a summer associate, I was asked to do a survey of state caselaw about a specific kind of transaction

using stuff I learned in my law and economics class, I included a big section about how "you know, this transaction type is economically equivalent to this other transaction type" and then a bunch of caselaw related to transaction type b.

the partner who assigned it to me took one look at the memo, and was like wtf is all this irrelevant stuff about the other transaction type

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861672)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:51 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly

Not a substantive fuckup, but I once sent to a partner a draft email for a client that was embarrassingly full of typos -- it was a 2-page email and it must have had 25 misspellings and similar issues. We just had our dotter and I was up late with her one night and thought as long as I was up that I would send it out. I clearly had no idea how tired I was, because what I sent was awful and somehow not even spellchecked (was I just clicking "skip"?). This partner had her secretary send me a redline of the email against what actually went out with no subject, no explanation in the body of the email, or anything -- just a redline of a 2-page email showing a shitton of typos. I went and apologized in person and she was relatively cool about it, how it wasn't like me, etc. It still comes up from time to time when I'm working for her and send things out late.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861753)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:54 PM
Author: Non sequitur

That partner sounds like a sociopath

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861771)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 8:01 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly

She kind of is.

I worked for one once who INSISTED that I be in at 9 (I used to come in around 9:15 or so, which really irritated him). I once came in to his business card sitting on my office chair as some sort of mafia-like sign to let me know that he knew that I wasn't in my chair at 9.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861808)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 8:03 PM
Author: Non sequitur

Ur firm sounds worse than biglaw

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861822)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 8:06 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly

Two separate firms. The business card asshole was at a firm that hired me during ITE -- I should have been more suspect of why they were the only firm hiring at that time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861868)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:22 PM
Author: Punctuation Monica

the business card thing is almost comical and it makes me wonder if it wasn't one of your coworkers being a douche

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862441)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 12:53 AM
Author: Jim_Kelly

There's a chance -- everyone hated that fucker.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863910)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:55 PM
Author: 90s | obese | jamaal

I once passed out on a partner - we were sending drafts back and forth at like 3 am. He sends me one e-mail being like "this should be the final one. proof this, then send it back to me and I will send it on to the client." So I do that, wait 15 minutes, no response, so I go to sleep. Next day I wake up to like 20 emails of some variation of "You awake???" or "I made more changes. Can you input??" before he just hit "accept changes" himself and sent it on. Ever since then he will append random emails with "don't disappear on me again!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861778)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:56 PM
Author: Non sequitur

Lmao

Fucking partners

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861785)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 7:58 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly

lol, the waiting game at that level is just the worst. My first week at the firm, before I even got my BlackBerry, I came into a subject-line-only email from the partner that said "you weren't supposed to leave yet"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861794)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:25 PM
Author: Punctuation Monica

hurry up and wait

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862468)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 12:10 AM
Author: Link Gaetz*

bahahaha. because he needs you to accept changes of course.

monsters.

the firm i'm at now is pretty good about this tbh. i don't get a ton of make work. secondary market.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863605)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:26 PM
Author: Punctuation Monica

that's not passing out, that's just being a normal human being whose body requires sleep

partner was a huge cunt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862478)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 8:04 PM
Author: donny (retired) (donny)

Lol op, partners are assholes. What he did made everything look worse. He should've just sent you out politely for 10 minutes to print the damn indices

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32861837)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:15 PM
Author: The Fruit Salad of Their Life

indexes*

"indices" if you're talking about metrics, "indexes" if you're talking about reference pages

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862372)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:30 PM
Author: donny (retired) (donny)

i was phone posting and thought i'd be kewt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862513)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:35 PM
Author: twentynine (neither mute nor ful of bable)

Correct though I think you can get away with using either plural form.

Interesting that "indexes" is preferable when talking about a book but in the same context "appendixes" is wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862542)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:16 PM
Author: .,.,.,,.,.,.,,..,..,,,...,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.


forgot to make a DACA contingent upon an event of default. oops

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862380)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:17 PM
Author: colt tp

Accepting an offer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862386)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:17 PM
Author: .,.,.,,.,.,.,,..,..,,,...,.,.,.,,.,.,.,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862389)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:23 PM
Author: Punctuation Monica

this times INFINITY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862457)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:27 PM
Author: PrestigeWhore (the prancing linguist)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862481)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:28 PM
Author: I strongly feel this is an insult to life itself



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862486)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:29 PM
Author: Ringo Starr ( )



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862499)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:49 PM
Author: Aspie Pickup Line



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862643)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 1:13 AM
Author: Judah Ben Jamin (*)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32864059)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 2:52 PM
Author: Mainlining the secret truth of the universe (Please do not hesitate to contact me)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32866849)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 9:30 PM
Author: ._._._._.._._._._.._._._._.._._._._.


I made an error In a footnote in a brief for a motion to dismiss. IIRC it was something like "plaintiffs six( 6) entity b claims are all based on fact 6 and in x law"

And really it should have been five, because of some technicality. We corrected it subsequently somehow. People didn't care.

I also missed a bad case once, got cited by oc in response, partner was angry Bc he thought we should have referenced it first in our brief even though it wasn't technically dispositive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32862505)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 11:06 PM
Author: [_____Signature Line_____]

Moar, u sweet scholarly whores.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863116)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 11:14 PM
Author: uspo (retired) (united states poast office)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863173)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 11:21 PM
Author: Link Gaetz*

I accidentally underlined the colon in "Note to Draft:" and sent an APA out at around 2 am. No shit, at 745 am the counsel on the case sent me an email bitching about it.

I found ways to strategically fuck her over in the future. Things like seeing a mistake she made in drafting and not correcting it, ignoring her emails on weekends so she would have to input her own goddamn hand comments because she didn't trust word processing to do it. Just little things to make sure her life was harder than it otherwise would have been.

And that's why you treat people working for you well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863227)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 11:54 PM
Author: [_____Signature Line_____]

Damn. U have got to be kidding me. An underlined colon caused her to flip out. Jfc.

I did something similar to what you did; not correcting the partner's errors or going out of my way to read the entire memo instead of the section the partner requested. Backfired on me and led to a shitty review. Got bitched at for not putting forth the extra effort to do what's needed, such as reading the other memo sections. Fuck that partner and the firm. Also, partner was always bitching a out billing too much. Why did u spend 1 hr on this? I only wanted u to proofread it! (but expected much more)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863484)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 12:06 AM
Author: Link Gaetz*

The key is to not give a fuck if they don't like you anymore. My firm was busy enough that I could just not do work for certain people and still have a more than full plate. I wasn't gunning for partner so fuck it? Why deal with it.

And I LOVe the shit you describe int he last sentence. Don't spend too much time on this, but so help me god if I find a single em-dash where an en-dash was appropriate you are the worst fuckign associate in biglaw history GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY OFFICE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863566)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 1:10 AM
Author: [_____Signature Line_____]

Yea, I stopped caring after the shitty review. I was in a small practice group so that partner's review did fuck me over. The partners I got along with didn't have the work to carry me. Anyways, I'm inhouse now and it's much better. I'm dealing with normal ppl. I don't deal with my old firm, but my friend does. Thankfully, they shifted work from my old firm to a diff one. I'll openly talk about how that firm was the worst working exp of my life with screamers, open instructions to run up the bill, etc, but I'll speak well of my second firm. I enjoyed my time ay the second place

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32864044)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 18th, 2017 11:45 PM
Author: Link Gaetz*

oh but the worst mistake was deleting a KEY closing condition accidentally and shooting it across to the full working group (like 80 people). Had to do the embarassing "please disregard the prior circulation and refer to the attache ddraft. Best, obeezy."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863409)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 1:13 AM
Author: [_____Signature Line_____]

Was this internal? If so, not so bad. Did the partner ask u to be more careful or give u shit?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32864060)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 12:09 AM
Author: corporate warrior poet

I've said this before but I mixed subpoenas up and sent them to wrong parties. Well actually the dumb whore secretary did but I got blamed for it. And apparently the partners had some MASTERMIND timing in place with coordinated depos and shit and we had to push everything back because of the fuck up which made us look terrible to client (lol I doubt they even noticed or cared)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32863591)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 2:50 PM
Author: """'"'''


forgot 2 add the "this doc remains subject to our clients review etc" when circulating a doc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32866831)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 10:31 PM
Author: joeybank aka Crypto Eyez Killah

Pulled together a binder of all the briefing, relevant exhibits, etc. for a partner prepping for a MTD argument. Word processing dept accidentally made it single, rather than double, sided. I said don't worry about it, who cares, just send it rather than make a new one. Partner was livid and brought it up multiple times.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870263)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 10:33 PM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::..,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,.


did he say why he needed double sided?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870280)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 11:03 PM
Author: twentynine (neither mute nor ful of bable)

I positively dislike double sided particularly for something I'm going to use in Court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870520)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 10:51 PM
Author: ..,..,..,...,,,...,..,.,,.,..,.,,


I poasted about mine here: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3549987&mc=3&forum_id=2

TLDR is that I missed a change in a redline from opposing counsel that could cost the clients millions (or could never be relevant, it depends). Since I caught it post-signing, there is nothing I can do but hope nobody ever notices.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870410)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 19th, 2017 11:46 PM
Author: LongTimeLurker1stTimePoaster


I'm surprised more ex-biglaw dudes don't come here and to tls to shit on their former firms.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3557229&forum_id=2#32870869)