Brothers, just brought in some litigation to the firm. About $900k in billables.
| insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Bat-shit-crazy place of business voyeur | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Bat-shit-crazy place of business voyeur | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | laughsome aqua address | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Bat-shit-crazy place of business voyeur | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | sick friendly grandma | 03/23/17 | | Peach Naked Garrison Affirmative Action | 03/23/17 | | umber mind-boggling marketing idea | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | big orchid university | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | big orchid university | 03/23/17 | | Adventurous poppy sanctuary hairy legs | 03/23/17 | | Buff ladyboy | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Stimulating violent roommate | 03/23/17 | | grizzly circlehead | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | grizzly circlehead | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | grizzly circlehead | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | trip generalized bond | 03/23/17 | | Odious church building juggernaut | 03/23/17 | | indecent chad telephone | 03/23/17 | | maniacal shrine | 03/23/17 | | big orchid university | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Alcoholic flushed private investor locus | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | Alcoholic flushed private investor locus | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 | | big orchid university | 03/23/17 | | insanely creepy dog poop | 03/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 23rd, 2017 2:14 PM Author: Bat-shit-crazy place of business voyeur
you are being overly generous then.
If it were a new client contact of yours where the only thing so far is this lit deal and you need the litigator to bring the client in, then 50/50 is appropriate.
If this is your ongoing client with a matter unrelated to your practice area, you should not have to split origination but the generous thing to do is throw 25% to the litigator.
Without being too greedy you want to keep enough control over origination so that when the client asks the litigator for tax advice, the litigator does not receive any origination for that and you control the split with the tax lawyer (if any).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3561953&forum_id=2#32898509) |
|
Date: March 23rd, 2017 2:11 PM Author: laughsome aqua address
"but after splitting origination with the litigator who will manage"
Should have tapped dat senior associate to handle it.
Could have had $200k.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3561953&forum_id=2#32898483) |
|
Date: March 23rd, 2017 2:22 PM Author: insanely creepy dog poop
Not really, but I don't really need that much more business.
Yes, I agree....people complain in the my firm about how lit mo's ride trannies, but they are all really good lawyers, so somehow we put up with it.
Best you can hope for is 23-24% in my firm, so not working with much.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3561953&forum_id=2#32898600) |
|
Date: March 23rd, 2017 8:19 PM Author: insanely creepy dog poop
mid size
I get 50% of the origination component, which is about about 24% of revenue (so about 12%)
about 46% of revenue goes to the equity partners doing the work
about 30% of revenue goes to overhead
No compensation committee. Its all just percentages.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3561953&forum_id=2#32901681) |
|
|