The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is computer-generated evidence hearsay? Like timestamps of ID card usage
| crawly domesticated forum faggotry | 03/24/17 |
| underhanded base | 03/24/17 |
| vibrant station chad | 03/24/17 |
| crawly domesticated forum faggotry | 03/24/17 |
| vibrant station chad | 03/24/17 |
| Histrionic goyim | 03/24/17 |
| Iridescent haunting abode | 03/24/17 |
| crawly domesticated forum faggotry | 03/24/17 |
| Mewling tattoo | 03/24/17 |
| Irradiated kitty cat ladyboy | 03/24/17 |
| Doobsian kitchen indirect expression | 03/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:14 PM Author: crawly domesticated forum faggotry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906833) |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: underhanded base Most likely comes in under business record under the federal rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906869) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:18 PM Author: vibrant station chad Probably but biz record exception. You'd more or less defeat the objection same time as u authenticate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906877) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:23 PM Author: crawly domesticated forum faggotry ty for responses -- part of me thinks they might not even be hearsay in the first place because they are not out of court statement by a human being (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906932) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:28 PM Author: vibrant station chad Neither is a bank statement or a cell phone bill but those are admitted as biz records. Either way u should be fine if this is for an irl issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906964) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:26 PM Author: Histrionic goyim There's a split of authority on this. There's an eleventh circuit case that says it is nonhearsay because there's no human to make a "statement." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906950) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:27 PM Author: Iridescent haunting abode remember when this was a law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906955) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: crawly domesticated forum faggotry Law mastermen, consider this:
employees sign in and write down the time they sign in when they come to work. one of those employees sues employer for firing him. employer seeks to admit the sign in sheet to show that employee was tardy and regularly signed-in late. is the record of that employee's sign-in times nonhearsay because it's an admission by party opponent (the employee's signing-in is his own statement of time of arrival)? |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: Mewling tattoo Of course it is. yw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907002) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Irradiated kitty cat ladyboy let me pull out my Barbri materials (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906989) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: Doobsian kitchen indirect expression would've researched this in the past week but the case settled so i didn't have to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907023) |