The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is computer-generated evidence hearsay? Like timestamps of ID card usage
| Snowy messiness cuck | 03/24/17 |
| Confused Rigor Jewess | 03/24/17 |
| impertinent field quadroon | 03/24/17 |
| Snowy messiness cuck | 03/24/17 |
| impertinent field quadroon | 03/24/17 |
| salmon odious puppy | 03/24/17 |
| obsidian thriller pocket flask box office | 03/24/17 |
| Snowy messiness cuck | 03/24/17 |
| Underhanded Rose Weed Whacker | 03/24/17 |
| Scarlet station headpube | 03/24/17 |
| Drab Big University Roommate | 03/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:14 PM Author: Snowy messiness cuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906833) |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: Confused Rigor Jewess Most likely comes in under business record under the federal rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906869) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:18 PM Author: impertinent field quadroon Probably but biz record exception. You'd more or less defeat the objection same time as u authenticate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906877) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:23 PM Author: Snowy messiness cuck ty for responses -- part of me thinks they might not even be hearsay in the first place because they are not out of court statement by a human being (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906932) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:28 PM Author: impertinent field quadroon Neither is a bank statement or a cell phone bill but those are admitted as biz records. Either way u should be fine if this is for an irl issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906964) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:26 PM Author: salmon odious puppy There's a split of authority on this. There's an eleventh circuit case that says it is nonhearsay because there's no human to make a "statement." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906950) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:27 PM Author: obsidian thriller pocket flask box office remember when this was a law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906955) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Snowy messiness cuck Law mastermen, consider this:
employees sign in and write down the time they sign in when they come to work. one of those employees sues employer for firing him. employer seeks to admit the sign in sheet to show that employee was tardy and regularly signed-in late. is the record of that employee's sign-in times nonhearsay because it's an admission by party opponent (the employee's signing-in is his own statement of time of arrival)? |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: Underhanded Rose Weed Whacker Of course it is. yw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907002) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Scarlet station headpube let me pull out my Barbri materials (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906989) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: Drab Big University Roommate would've researched this in the past week but the case settled so i didn't have to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907023) |