The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is computer-generated evidence hearsay? Like timestamps of ID card usage
| Spruce feces lay | 03/24/17 |
| peach kitty | 03/24/17 |
| startled crimson lettuce legal warrant | 03/24/17 |
| Spruce feces lay | 03/24/17 |
| startled crimson lettuce legal warrant | 03/24/17 |
| talented foreskin | 03/24/17 |
| Floppy chapel | 03/24/17 |
| Spruce feces lay | 03/24/17 |
| Narrow-minded Alcoholic Haunted Graveyard | 03/24/17 |
| stimulating spot cumskin | 03/24/17 |
| histrionic maroon party of the first part space | 03/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:14 PM Author: Spruce feces lay (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906833) |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: peach kitty Most likely comes in under business record under the federal rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906869) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:18 PM Author: startled crimson lettuce legal warrant Probably but biz record exception. You'd more or less defeat the objection same time as u authenticate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906877) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:23 PM Author: Spruce feces lay ty for responses -- part of me thinks they might not even be hearsay in the first place because they are not out of court statement by a human being (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906932) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:28 PM Author: startled crimson lettuce legal warrant Neither is a bank statement or a cell phone bill but those are admitted as biz records. Either way u should be fine if this is for an irl issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906964) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:26 PM Author: talented foreskin There's a split of authority on this. There's an eleventh circuit case that says it is nonhearsay because there's no human to make a "statement." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906950) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:27 PM Author: Floppy chapel remember when this was a law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906955) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Spruce feces lay Law mastermen, consider this:
employees sign in and write down the time they sign in when they come to work. one of those employees sues employer for firing him. employer seeks to admit the sign in sheet to show that employee was tardy and regularly signed-in late. is the record of that employee's sign-in times nonhearsay because it's an admission by party opponent (the employee's signing-in is his own statement of time of arrival)? |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: Narrow-minded Alcoholic Haunted Graveyard Of course it is. yw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907002) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: stimulating spot cumskin let me pull out my Barbri materials (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906989) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: histrionic maroon party of the first part space would've researched this in the past week but the case settled so i didn't have to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907023) |