The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
pick two americans at random. the main difference b/w them will be their IQ
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 22nd, 2017 9:50 AM Author: contagious native agree or disagree? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133358) |
Date: April 22nd, 2017 9:53 AM Author: yellow forum wrinkle Life is a big IQ test (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133369) |
 |
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:52 PM Author: gay boistinker dilemma with no reward at the end (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134999) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:59 PM Author: peach principal's office so like a real IQ test (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33135041) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:08 PM Author: well-lubricated dun deer antler azn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137363) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:16 PM Author: chrome pervert (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137413) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:03 AM Author: cerise demanding base Age. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133413) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:18 AM Author: contagious native yeah, this is probably correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133496) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:24 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit This is almost certainly incorrect; age disribition is a pyramid. The odds of a very old and very young person being randomly selected is much smaller than two relatively young people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133512) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:26 AM Author: spectacular nighttime rigor http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ja1zaAogN1A/VGJ6_xIb3YI/AAAAAAAAS4k/1QLfaPkY8r0/s1600/US-Population-By-Age.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133520) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:28 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit Can't click on that
There are far more young than olds. Age is a pyramid. Bigger base/ smaller top. What we are looking for is something with a small SD that is also not a pyramid in structure. I.e.- lots of variation, and a fairly equal distribution of the variation
Edit: Look at the graph you posted turned vertically. It's essentially a pyramid; you just chose a visual that plots on a different axis. Google " age pyramid" or population pyramid ... http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/age_structure.html |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 11:03 AM Author: impressive galvanic chapel toilet seat It's not a pyramid, owing to generational differences. There are more people 50-59 than there are 0-9. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133713) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:34 PM Author: Big-titted Volcanic Crater Tattoo It's not much of a pyramid of the pyramid only starts in the 50s.
Why don't you just make your argument without the pyramid claim? |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 12:23 PM Author: soul-stirring trump supporter stage one wonders where you think relatively young ppl come from (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134289) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:22 PM Author: Fragrant locale You're too dumb not to be flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137443) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:05 AM Author: Thirsty dragon what bathroom they use (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133425) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:06 AM Author: spectacular nighttime rigor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133429) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:06 AM Author: Lascivious sepia pocket flask not if we assume that iq follows a normal distribution, because there are other traits which follow distributions which have higher likely spreads (e.g. age)
it also depends on how you're quantifying the difference. for example, how do you compare a difference in a numerical trait like age to a binary trait like gender. |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:12 AM Author: yellow forum wrinkle IQ is literally defined as following a normal distribution N(100,15) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133467) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:15 AM Author: Lascivious sepia pocket flask yes i know just highlighting why it's an important consideration (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133481) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:16 AM Author: yellow forum wrinkle carry on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133485) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:39 PM Author: Big-titted Volcanic Crater Tattoo The tests were *designed* to have 100 means and SDs of 15 or 16 (depending on the test), but that's different from *defining* IQ in that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134937) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:50 PM Author: peach principal's office except for the part where they convert from a raw score to a scaled score, so they pretty much get to decide on the distribution. they norm it on a large enough sample that they pretty much know how people are going to do.
of course the scores are roughly normally distributed anyway, that's why they don't use some other distribution instead. |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:06 PM Author: yellow forum wrinkle correct
|
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:52 PM Author: emerald vibrant garrison main people sure but a histogram of questions answered correctly would have an even tighter numerical distribution. at the upper and lower ends of IQ scores, just a few questions can move you by a standard deviation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134996) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:09 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit Disagree. Bell curve and all - most people cluster around the mean IQ of 100. This is also true for most biometric markers. Best to pick something without as tight of a mean cluster if you want to improve your odds of big differences between two randoms. Age is a good one
|
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:10 AM Author: alcoholic sound barrier ape (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133453) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:10 AM Author: Lascivious sepia pocket flask (person who read my post three minutes ago) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133456) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:12 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit Where my reasoning breaks down is comparing whether there is greater statistical likelihood of a difference in something binary ( like gender or political orientation) vs something mean clustered. I'm not good enough at statistics for that, but it seems dependent on the size of the SD. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133466) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:13 AM Author: yellow forum wrinkle You keep saying "clustering" but I don't think you know what it means (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133473) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:15 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit I may not . I just mean to say the sort of normal distribution usually expected with markers like IQ or height (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133480) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:13 AM Author: Lascivious sepia pocket flask (person who read the second paragraph of my post six minutes ago) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133474) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:14 AM Author: spectacular nighttime rigor Dat z score (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133477) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:11 AM Author: yellow forum wrinkle (Normal distribution masterwoman) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133460) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:12 AM Author: spectacular nighttime rigor (Statistics expert) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133463) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:16 AM Author: titillating persian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133486) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:14 AM Author: rambunctious flushed messiness Julia I love your poasts and your tits too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133476) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:10 AM Author: laughsome sickened parlor boiling water race (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133458) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:18 AM Author: contagious native honestly I don't think this is true even in 2017. maybe in 2037 though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133494) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:22 AM Author: Plum Private Investor Pit Also hard to quantify racial difference. Is the difference between a black vs a white person greater or equal to an Asian vs White person? And is the difference between either greater than the difference between a 100 vs 115 IQ? IQ, age, height, etc., at least are quantifiable and you can argue that the greater the SD, the bigger the difference. " Race" is pretty vague in that regard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133503) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 12:22 PM Author: laughsome sickened parlor boiling water 2 american children, then (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134281) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:28 AM Author: saffron mediation weirdly worded q, random means you could get 2 equal IQ people?
if you're asking what single trait, all other things being equal, would cause the biggest difference in two different americans, obviously 70 iq/130 iq would probably be the biggest reasonable difference yea. otherwise, it's probably some geographic difference like coastal urbanite v. breadbasket farmer.
race would be a big one except there's very little difference between asians and white strivers, also hispanics and poor whites. obviously upper class asian and urban black would be the biggest. |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:31 AM Author: peach principal's office (guy who doesn't think probabilistically) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133545) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 10:43 AM Author: saffron mediation I mean if the question is really a probability one like asked, then iq can't be the biggest difference because of the bell curve - picking two random people means your highest chances are of picking 2 100-iq people and fans out from there. Same thing with race though to a lesser degree - most Americans are white, blacks are only like 10% - so the highest likelihood is white-white. Same thing with urban/rural because something like 75% of the country lives in urban areas.
The answer would probably be sex then, given that half the time you get a pretty meaningless same-sex pairing but half the time you get an opposite-sex pairing. Men and women are very different - you might get bigger differences between black poor and rich asian, or 140-iq versus 60-iq, but because the probability of that pairing coming up is so low you're better off just picking sex. |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 11:04 AM Author: Thirsty dragon ding ding ding (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133724) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 11:06 AM Author: impressive galvanic chapel toilet seat Income would get you further apart, insofar as it has a higher SD compared to its mean. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33133730) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:48 PM Author: emerald vibrant garrison main people income isn't normally distributed either. wealth distribution is even more extreme.
it'd be incredibly unlikely to draw two people at random where one has an IQ even 4x the other.
income even if you draw the top 10% against bottom 10% that's a massive relative difference. not even sure it'd make sense since the bottom of the income distribution without government assistance is 0. is a middle class person infinitely better off than a poor? |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:40 PM Author: Lake home mood weight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134942) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:52 PM Author: emerald vibrant garrison main people yeah especially since women weigh much less than men *record scratch sound* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33135002) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: Lake home mood factor in young children (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33135034) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:40 PM Author: angry market Gender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134943) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 2:49 PM Author: emerald vibrant garrison main people not a continuous variable unless you're a shitlib. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33134979) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:07 PM Author: yellow forum wrinkle FB's 53 genders is close to continuous (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137360) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:08 PM Author: well-lubricated dun deer antler azn this sits is full of autism and it upsets me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137367) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2017 8:19 PM Author: talented yarmulke height (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3592014&forum_id=2#33137427) |