PSA: If you think Comey "owned" his "personal" FBI memos, you have down syndrome
| Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 07/30/17 | | purple incel | 06/11/17 | | Aquamarine Lascivious Boltzmann Puppy | 06/11/17 | | Wonderful Hyperactive Messiness | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | Very tactful love of her life | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | self-centered home | 06/11/17 | | Razzmatazz Filthpig | 06/11/17 | | Stirring Khaki Orchestra Pit Pervert | 06/11/17 | | Adventurous double fault | 06/11/17 | | bull headed autistic parlor milk | 06/12/17 | | Sooty corner | 02/02/18 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Costumed arousing pit | 06/11/17 | | chrome crackhouse cuckoldry | 06/11/17 | | sapphire titillating station antidepressant drug | 06/12/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | Wonderful Hyperactive Messiness | 06/11/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | Wonderful Hyperactive Messiness | 06/11/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | Well-lubricated narrow-minded marketing idea temple | 06/11/17 | | Wonderful Hyperactive Messiness | 06/11/17 | | chrome crackhouse cuckoldry | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/11/17 | | chrome crackhouse cuckoldry | 06/11/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 06/11/17 | | trip psychic casino | 06/11/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 07/14/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/12/17 | | vermilion sickened range | 06/15/17 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 02/02/18 | | Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender | 02/02/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: June 11th, 2017 9:12 PM Author: vermilion sickened range
Reply Favorite
Date: June 11th, 2017 8:21 PM
Author: Benevolent Screed
Links to where I've discussed Flynn? I'll be waiting, dipshit.
Also, I have to LOL at this: "despite the existence of a grand jury and press accounts pointing to a virtually guaranteed 18 USC section 1001 charge."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3644117&forum_id=2#33530678)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3644117&forum_id=2#33531085) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2017 8:30 PM Author: chrome crackhouse cuckoldry
As a threshold matter, Comey asked a question with regard to Trump that he should now answer with regard to his own conduct. Comey asked why Trump would ask everyone to leave the Oval Office to speak with Comey unless he was doing something improper. Yet, Trump could ask why Comey would use a third party to leak these memos if they were his property and there was nothing improper in their public release.
In fact, there was a great deal wrong with their release, and Comey likely knew it. These were documents prepared on an FBI computer addressing a highly sensitive investigation on facts that he considered material to that investigation. Indeed, he conveyed that information confidentially to his top aides and later said that he wanted the information to be given to the special counsel because it was important to the investigation.
Many in the media have tried to spin this as not a “leak” because leaks by definition only involve classified information. That is entirely untrue as shown by history. Leaks involve the release of unauthorized information — not only classified information. Many of the most important leaks historically have involved pictures and facts not classified but embarrassing to a government. More importantly, federal regulations refer to unauthorized disclosures not just classified information.
Comey’s position would effectively gut a host of federal rules and regulations. He is suggesting that any federal employee effectively owns documents created during federal employment in relation to an ongoing investigation so long as they address the information to themselves. FBI agents routinely write such memos in investigations. They are called 302s to memorialize field interviews or fact acquisitions. They are treated as FBI information.
The Justice Department routinely claims such memos as privileged and covered by the deliberative process privilege and other privileges. Indeed, if this information were sought under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) it would likely have been denied. Among other things, the Justice Department and FBI routinely claim privilege “inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.”
Of course, Comey did not know if there was a privilege or classification claim by either the Justice Department or the White House because he never asked for review. He just woke up in the middle of night upset about Trump’s name calling and released the damaging information. In doing so, he used these memos not as a shield but a sword.
Besides being subject to nondisclosure agreements, Comey falls under federal laws governing the disclosure of classified and unclassified information. Assuming that the memos were not classified (though it seems odd that it would not be classified even on the confidential level), there is 18 U.S.C. § 641, which makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof.”
There are also ethical and departmental rules against the use of material to damage a former represented person or individual or firm related to prior representation. The FBI website warns employees that “dissemination of FBI information is made strictly in accordance with provisions of the Privacy Act; Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a; FBI policy and procedures regarding discretionary release of information in accordance with the Privacy Act; and other applicable federal orders and directives.”
One such regulation is § 2635.703, on the use of nonpublic information, which states, “An employee shall not engage in a financial transaction using nonpublic information, nor allow the improper use of nonpublic information to further his own private interest or that of another, whether through advice or recommendation, or by knowing unauthorized disclosure.”
The standard FBI employment agreement bars the unauthorized disclosure of information “contained in the files, electronic or paper, of the FBI” that impact the bureau and specifically pledges that “I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.”
Had Comey taken the minimal step of seeking clearance, the department would likely have said that this was FBI information and not personal information. Comey instead decided to ask forgiveness rather than permission.
Comey is also subject to bar rules on releasing information inimical to the interests of his former employer. For example, under professional rule 1.6, lawyers need to secure authority to release information that “(1) reveal a confidence or secret of the lawyer’s client; (2) use a confidence or secret of the lawyer’s client to the disadvantage of the client; [or] (3) use a confidence or secret of the lawyer’s client for the advantage of the lawyer or of a third person.”
Comey actually showed both how to and how not to disclose such information. When Comey released the information, he knew that he was going to be called to Congress where he could disclose this information properly after giving the White House a chance to claim privilege. Instead, he decided to release the information early. Why?
Comey gave two equally implausible explanations. First, he suggested that he wanted to get the information to investigators. However, he knew not only that he was likely to testify but that these memos would inevitably be demanded by both congressional and federal investigators. Second, he said that he wanted to ensure the appointment of a special counsel. However on that Monday, many of us were saying that such an appointment was virtually inevitable. More importantly, he could have given the memos to investigators and properly laid the foundation for a special counsel.
The fact is that the leaking of the memos worked to the advantage of James Comey, not Robert Mueller. Comey was able to take over the narrative and news cycle after Trump had publicly belittled him and his record. Special counsels do not like leaks of this kind. It would have been far better for the special counsel (or Comey’s own former investigatory team and congressional investigators) to have the memos confidentially.
The greatest value of the memos would be to question Trump and other potential targets without their knowing of their existence. The memos could then have been used to establish false statements and pressure cooperation. Instead, Comey told possible targets, including Trump, about the evidence against them in the memos.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/337160-opinion-the-damaging-case-against-james-comey
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3644117&forum_id=2#33530766) |
Date: February 2nd, 2018 3:45 PM Author: Lemon aphrodisiac forum sex offender
Whoops, looks like a shitlib Judge just agreed with DOJ and Mueller that Comey's memos were official government documents and therefore not subject to disclosure under FOIA.
As an aside, I have to LOL at the hoops the judge jumps through in the second half of the opinion where he addresses Comey's public disclosure of the memo and sending it to his law professor.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/politics/lawsuit-comey-memos-trump-conversations/index.html
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3644117&forum_id=2#35307206) |
|
|