https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/94/28/93/9428933044e19181e46f8d0f4c39c97c.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592252)

It annoys me as well. It's insanely cringeworthy when you see a bunch of nebbish and awkward faggots around here constantly use "bro" "breh" etc. give each other horrible fitness advice and talk about how "chill and fratty" (you're Asian--we get it) shit is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592221)

you an alpha chad but your HS gf was literally tweeting the whole world bout how fucking small your dick is?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592601)

The same is true of girls in law school who make a "hot girl clique" just because LS girls are relatively ugly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592376)

I don't think there's anything noteworthy about people becoming friends with others who appear to be in the same social milieu. Attractive, outgoing female students of a similar age probably have the most in common with each other.

And everyone knows law school is just like high school.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592467)

amirite?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33599734)

As long as these people don't look down on the types of people that they once were, self-improvement is generally a good thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33592688)

Law Schools were originally developed by, for, and in the service of the Prep Clique: promoting "Justice" was never its goal. Law Schools were NEVER intended for Losers, Nerds, Scumbags, Women, or Blacks, who attend Law School in vast (and unsupportable) numbers now.

I. The original purpose of Law Schools was to train the sons of High and Ascended Preps to serve and perpetuate the wealth and power of Prep Clique, which has always been composed of a relatively few elite, extremely wealthy families. These were people who could well afford to pay for the legal training and then the services of a dedicated class of legal experts to win disputes, rig laws and elections in their favor, and legitimize a new class of political elites to run the entire show. The whole purpose of training their sons in the Law was thus to insulate the Prep Class from the horrors of democracy, accountability and equality as proclaimed by the fledgling Republic.

II. The old system "worked" reasonably well, until Ascended Nerds took over Academia. The Nerds then perverted the original purpose of Law Schools to serve their OWN ends, such as receiving CEO-type salaries for producing nothing. They lured non-Preps into an ever expanding system by basing entry and success in Law School solely on I.Q. (standardized LSAT's, "Socratic" teaching techniques and exams based on "issue spotting"), without developing any real world skills. This was a system that could ONLY have been developed by Nerd academicians. The whole goal of Academia as re-purposed by the Nerd elites is to educate the other Cliques far past their basic intelligence and far beyond the needs of Society at large. This affords Nerd Academia the opportunity to cash in by maximizing tuition, fees, expensive textbooks, professorships, grant money, chairs and Dean Positions, plus expand the academic bureaucracies to unheard-of levels.

III. The vast expansion of the Law School "industry" is thus directly attributable to the Nerd Clique co-opting a system that was supposed to cater to the elite Prep Aristocracy and the Corporations they own, who could afford to pay for it. The new purpose of the Law Schools is to churn out huge numbers of non-Prep attorneys who serve no earthly purpose even within their own Cliques. Non-Prep Cliques can neither afford nor have real use for high-priced attorneys. Herein lay the roots of the Law School scam.

It's all dictated by the internal logic of Clique Theory and is amply demonstrated by the manifest failure of the Law School economic model - and legal education - in America.

***

Nerds always have Good IQs. Losers sometimes, but not always, have Good IQs. This is demonstrated by standardized testing, which controls for Clique when testing IQ. Nerds get 1500s on the SAT, while Losers get an average score of 1340. Nerds are better than Losers in terms of IQ, but Losers are still better than Jocks, Preps, and Women.

Yet in terms of GPA, there is no question that Nerds Win while Losers Lose. This is for several reasons. First, GPA is a social construct, with Losers being docked points for being Losers. Preps and Jocks are also awarded points for being in the upper Castes. Secondly, GPA does not require just strict intelligence to win. GPA requires work, effort, and self-discipline, and Losers often lack these things because they wallow in ignominy, fretting over having Bad Friends or not getting laid or having mental illnesses.

This is why Nerds excel in terms of GPA. Nerds are brains with vestigial bodies. They do not care about parties, friends, and only marginally care about getting laid on a biological level. Plus, because they are members of a Clique, they get laid with other Nerds. Also, Nerds never have mental illnesses, because that wouldn't be rational. Nerds are like computers, where you plug in the information and the Nerd spits out the right answer. This is why Nerds excel at both standardized tests and GPA. Nerds are not punished by the High Losers who rule high school and college classrooms like fiefdoms, because Losers NEVER try and pwn Nerds. Losers only assault other Losers, with a vengeance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33599830)

Do "former nerds" include nerds who got real about advocating for their interests in society instead of being doormats?

Or is it just about aping the cool kids?

Also dressing well can be a sign of self worth and fastidiousness, not necessarily striving or conventionality.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3651884&forum_id=2#33599848)