The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why don't former law clerks EVER shit talk their judges?
| swashbuckling zombie-like national security agency | 06/26/17 |
| Impressive vigorous hall | 06/26/17 |
| spectacular liquid oxygen | 06/26/17 |
| Rusted Nofapping Giraffe | 06/26/17 |
| Henna Haunted Graveyard | 06/26/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 26th, 2017 1:39 PM Author: swashbuckling zombie-like national security agency it's very strange. you would think that some former clerks would be honest and let people know how dumb/incompetent their bosses were from time to time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3658751&forum_id=2#33644907) |
 |
Date: June 26th, 2017 1:40 PM Author: Impressive vigorous hall doing so would not speak well of the former clerk in most instances (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3658751&forum_id=2#33644919) |
Date: June 26th, 2017 1:42 PM Author: spectacular liquid oxygen My mom and I can bitch about my dad but if you do I'll punch you. Same deal with clerks & judges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3658751&forum_id=2#33644935) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2017 1:43 PM Author: Rusted Nofapping Giraffe Because the large majority of people who clerk for A-3 judges actually think law is a noble profession and not a steaming pile of garbage. They're all gunners who everybody hated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3658751&forum_id=2#33644952) |
|
Date: June 26th, 2017 1:47 PM Author: Henna Haunted Graveyard are you a nonlawmo? its an ethical rules violation to shittalk a sitting member of the judiciary. i mean technically you can but its a very slippery slope between exercising your 1st amendment right and violating Rule 8.2
Maintaining The Integrity Of The Profession Rule 8.2 Judicial And Legal Officials
(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.
[1] Assessments by lawyers are relied on in evaluating the professional or personal fitness of persons being considered for election or appointment to judicial office and to public legal offices, such as attorney general, prosecuting attorney and public defender. Expressing honest and candid opinions on such matters contributes to improving the administration of justice. Conversely, false statements by a lawyer can unfairly undermine public confidence in the administration of justice.
[3] To maintain the fair and independent administration of justice, lawyers are encouraged to continue traditional efforts to defend judges and courts unjustly criticized.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_8_2_judicial_legal_officials.html |