SIXTH CIRCUIT FUCKS OVER POLICE SHOOTING VICTIM; FUCKED UP CASE
| electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | saffron jew | 07/19/17 | | razzmatazz bull headed spot selfie | 07/19/17 | | electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | razzmatazz bull headed spot selfie | 07/19/17 | | electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | dun coffee pot | 07/19/17 | | slate cheese-eating public bath | 07/19/17 | | electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | Hairraiser Set | 07/19/17 | | electric double fault | 07/19/17 | | Transparent national | 07/19/17 | | jet-lagged territorial heaven volcanic crater | 07/19/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: July 19th, 2017 5:11 PM Author: Hairraiser Set
The dissent was unhinged. After a high speed chase in the rain with speeds exceeding 100 mph, which concluded in the middle of nowhere, this occurred:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-aTO6JImA0
The suspect had demonstrated he was determined to avoid apprehension, and he was moving towards the officer to beat his ass.
As a matter of departmental policy, it would be perfectly reasonable to implement a policy where the police disengage in such situations instead of using lethal force. However, just because one reasonable approach to this situation does not entail the use of lethal force does not preclude the reasonableness of using lethal force from a constitutional perspective. It was perfectly reasonable for the officer to fear for his life in this situation, meaning it was a good shot.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3679324&forum_id=2#33811008) |
|
|