SIXTH CIRCUIT FUCKS OVER POLICE SHOOTING VICTIM; FUCKED UP CASE
| hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | floppy bespoke stock car market | 07/19/17 | | Irradiated stead pistol | 07/19/17 | | hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | Irradiated stead pistol | 07/19/17 | | hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | Zombie-like Vermilion Stage Azn | 07/19/17 | | Dull tripping church gaming laptop | 07/19/17 | | hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | Disrespectful juggernaut | 07/19/17 | | hairless regret dilemma | 07/19/17 | | greedy pearl home | 07/19/17 | | Razzle-dazzle indian lodge | 07/19/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: July 19th, 2017 5:11 PM Author: Disrespectful juggernaut
The dissent was unhinged. After a high speed chase in the rain with speeds exceeding 100 mph, which concluded in the middle of nowhere, this occurred:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-aTO6JImA0
The suspect had demonstrated he was determined to avoid apprehension, and he was moving towards the officer to beat his ass.
As a matter of departmental policy, it would be perfectly reasonable to implement a policy where the police disengage in such situations instead of using lethal force. However, just because one reasonable approach to this situation does not entail the use of lethal force does not preclude the reasonableness of using lethal force from a constitutional perspective. It was perfectly reasonable for the officer to fear for his life in this situation, meaning it was a good shot.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3679324&forum_id=2#33811008) |
|
|